Bayesian Method for Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network Analysis
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137, Issue 1
Abstract
A new methodology is developed to analyze existing monitoring networks. This methodology incorporates different aspects of monitoring, including vulnerability/probability assessment, environmental health risk, the value of information, and redundancy reduction. A conceptual framework for groundwater quality monitoring is formulated to represent the methodology’s context. Relevance vector machine (RVM) plays a basic role in this conceptual framework, and is employed to reduce redundancy and to create probability map of contaminant distribution, and accordingly to estimate the expected value of sample information. Disability adjusted life years approach of the global burden of disease is used for quantifying the health risk consequences. This is demonstrated through a case study application to nitrate contamination monitoring in the West Bank, Palestine. The results obtained from the RVM analysis showed that an overlap error of less than 30% were obtained based on using around 30% of the monitoring sites (170 relevance vectors). This reflects the importance of the RVM as a useful model for improving the efficiency of monitoring systems, both in terms of reducing redundancy and increasing the information content of the collected data. However, in this application, the results of health risk assessment and the evaluation of monitoring investments were less encouraging due to the minimal elasticity of the nitrate health effect with respect to monitoring information and uncertainty.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., and Petty, R. J. (1987). “DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings.” Rep. No. EPA/600/2-85/0108, U.S. EPA, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Okla.
Ammar, A. K. (2007). “A Bayesian method for groundwater quality monitoring network analysis.” Dissertation, Utah State Univ., Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ammar, K., Khalil, A., McKee, M., and Kaluarachchi, J. (2008). “Bayesian deduction for redundancy detection in groundwater quality monitoring networks.” Water Resour. Res., 44, W08412.
Bates, S., Cullen, A., and Raftery, A. (2003). “Bayesian uncertainty assessment in multicompartment deterministic simulation models for environmental risk assessment.” Environmetrics, 14, 355–371.
CH2M HILL. (2001). “Aquifer modeling.” Water resources program phase III, USAID, Washington, D.C.
Fewtrell, L. (2004). “Drinking-water nitrate, methemoglobinemia, and global burden of disease: A discussion.” Environ. Health Perspect., 112(14), 1371–1374.
Harmancioglu, N. B., Fistikoglu, O., Ozkul, S. D., Singh, V. P., and Alpaslan, M. N. (1999). Water science and technology library: Water quality monitoring network design, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Khadam, I., and Kaluarachchi, J. (2003). “Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated groundwater.” Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev., 23, 683–721.
Khalil, A., Almasri, M., McKee, M., and Kaluarachchi, J. (2005a). “Applicability of statistical learning algorithms in groundwater quality modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 41, W05010.
Khalil, A., McKee, M., Kemblowski, M., and Asefa, T. (2005b). “Sparse Bayesian learning machine for real-time management of reservoir releases.” Water Resour. Res., 41(11), W11401.
Khalil, A., McKee, M., Kemblowski, M., Asefa, T., and Bastidas, L. (2006). “Multiobjective analysis of chaotic dynamic systems with sparse learning machines.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(1), 72–88.
Kim, J., and Bridges, T. (2006). “Risk, uncertainty, and decision analysis applied to the management of aquatic nuisance species.” ERDC/TN ANSRP-06-1, Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Lopez, A., Mathers, C., Ezzati, M., Jamison, D., and Murray, C. (2006). Global burden of disease and risk factors, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Palestinian Center Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). (2002). Results of population census of December 1997 in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, 1998, Ramallah, Palestine.
Tappenden, P., Chilcott, J., Eggington, S., Oakley, J., and MaCabe, C. (2004). “Methods for expected value of information analysis in complex health economic models: Developments on the health economics of interferon- and glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis.” Health Technol. Assess, 8(27), 1–92.
Thayananthan, A., Navaratnam, R., Stenger, B. Torr, P., and R. Cilpolla. (2006). “Multivariate relevance vector machines for tracking.” Proc., European Conf. on Computer Vision, Dublin, Ireland.
Tipping, M. E. (2001). “Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine.” J. Mach. Learn. Res., 1, 211–244.
Tipping M. E., and Faul A. C. (2003). “Fast marginal likelihood maximisation for sparse Bayesian models.” Proc., 9th Int. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistic, C. M. Bishop and B. J. Frey, eds., Key West, Fla.
Tripathi, S., and Govindaraju, R. S. (2006). “On selection of kernel parameters in relevance vector machines for hydrologic applications.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 21(6), 747–764.
U.S. EPA. (2001). “Risk assessment guidance for superfund: Volume III—Part A, Process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment.” EPA 540-R-02-002 OSWER 9285.7-45 PB2002 963302, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/superfund/RAGS3A/index.htm⟩.
World Health Organization (WHO) (1996). “Health criteria and other supporting information.” Guidelines for drinking water quality, 2nd. Ed. Vol. 2, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yokota, F., and Thompson, K. (2004). “Value of information analysis in environmental health risk management decisions: Past, present, and future.” Risk Anal., 24(3), 635–650.
Zhang, H., and Malik, J. (2005). “Selecting shape features using multi-class relevance vector machines.” Technical Rep. No. UCB/EECS-2005-6, EECS, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 5, 2008
Accepted: Jul 31, 2009
Published online: Aug 3, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.