Abstract

The water planning and management policies of the Rio Grande basin no longer respond to the sustainable needs of water users, environment, and international commitments of this transboundary basin between Mexico and the United States. This paper describes how groundwater banking through an in lieu method is one approach leading to better water management in this basin. In lieu groundwater banking is a conjunctive water allocation policy applicable to water users supplied from surface water and groundwater sources. A basin simulation model of the Rio Grande basin, built in the water evaluation and planning system (WEAP) software, was used to evaluate the groundwater banking policy. Two scenarios are discussed: a baseline scenario without new water allocation policies implemented and a groundwater banking scenario considering the in lieu groundwater banking method implemented in the Meoqui aquifer. Results show that groundwater banking can significantly improve water management in the basin, increasing system storage, improving water supply for users in the basin, and enhancing compliance with the treaty obligations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) for the financial support provided to the first writer. Partial funding for this research was provided by the Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Special thanks are given to the National Heritage Institute and the Stockholm Environment Institute.

References

Buras, N. (1963). “Conjunctive operation of dams and aquifers.” Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 89(HY6), 111–131.
Caballero, J. O. (2005). Sociedad de Asociaciones de Usuarios: Unidad Conchos, Comisión Nacional del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Collado, J. (2002). “Criterios de distribución del agua en la Cuenca del Rio Bravo.” Coordinación de tecnología de riego y drenaje, Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). (2005). “Distrito de Riego 026 Bajo Río San Juan.” subdirección General de Infraestructura Hidroagrícola, Gerencia de Distritos y Unidades de riego, Gerencia Regional del Río Bravo, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). (2007). “Diagnostico Hidrológico de la Cuenca del Rio Bravo.” Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). (2008). Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer el resultado de los estudios de disponibilidad media anual de las aguas superficiales en la cuenca del Rio Bravo, Diario Oficial de la Federación, Distrito Federal, Mexico (Sept. 29, 2008).
Danner, C. L., McKinney, D. C., Teasley, R. L., and Sandoval-Solis, S. (2006). “Documentation and testing of the WEAP model for the Rio Grande basin.” CRWR Online Rep. No. 06-8, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J. R., and Loucks, D. P. (1982). “Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation.” Water Resour. Res., 18(1), 14–20.
International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). (1906). “Convention between the United States and Mexico.” Equitable distribution of the waters of the Rio Grande, IBWC, Washington, D.C.
International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). (1944). “Treaty between the United States and Mexico.” Utilization of waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, IBWC, Washington, D.C.
International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). (2002). “Minute 308.” United States allocation of Rio Grande waters during the last year of the current cycle, IBWC, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico
International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). (2005). “Procedimiento de cálculo para la contabilidad de las aguas en el Rio Bravo.” Criterio para calcular las pérdidas de las aportaciones de los afluentes mexicanos al Rio Bravo asociadas con las transferencias de agua de las presas internacionales, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). (2008). “Rio Grande historical mean daily discharge data.” Diversions from the Rio Grande United States, IBWC United States Section, El Paso, Tex., ⟨http://www.ibwc.state.gov/Water_Data/histflo1.htm⟩ (Dec. 31, 2008).
Kern Water Bank (KWB). (2008). Recharge and recovery—Infrastructure development, Kern Water Bank Authority, Bakersfield, Calif., ⟨http://www.kwb.org/main.htm⟩ (Dec. 31, 2008).
LAN. (2004). Ley de Aguas Nacionales y su Reglamento, Comisión Nacional del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Legates, D. R., and McCabe, G. J. (1999). “Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233–241.
Loucks, D. P. (1997). “Quantifying trends in system sustainability.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 42(4), 513–530.
Loucks, D. P., and van Beek, E. (2005). Water resources systems planning and management, UNESCO, Paris.
McMahon, T. A., Adeloye, A. J., and Zhou, S. -L., (2006). “Understanding performance measures of reservoirs.” J. Hydrol., 324, 359–382.
McPhee, J., and Yeh, W. (2004). “Multiobjective optimization for sustainable groundwater management in semiarid regions.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(6), 490–497.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290.
Oregon State University (OSU). (2005). Transboundary freshwater dispute database, Institute for Water and Watersheds, Corvallis, Ore.
Pulido-Velázquez, M., Andreu, J., and Sahuquillo, A. (2006). “Economic optimization of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater at the basin scale.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 132(6), 454–467.
Purkey, D. R., Huber-Lee, A., Yates, D., Hanemann, M., and Herrod-Julius, S. (2006). “Integrating a climate change assessment tool into stakeholder-driven water management decision-making processes in California.” Water Resour. Manage., 21(1), 315–329.
Reining, Y., Behrens, J., and Charles, E. (1999). “Using simulation to develop a conjunctive use policy: The Salt River project experience.” Proc., 29th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conf., 102, 177, ASCE, Reston, Va.
R. J. Brandes Company. (2003). “Water availability modeling for the Río Grande basin: Naturalized streamflow data.” Final Rep., Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
REPDA. (2004). Registro Público de Derechos de Agua, Comisión Nacional del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2004). Estadísticas del Agua en México, Comisión Nacional del Agua. Sistema Unificado de Información Básica del Agua, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2002). Decreto mediante el cual se otorgan facilidades administrativas para la regularización de usuarios de aguas nacionales que realicen actividades de carácter agrícola, Diario Oficial de la Federación, Distrito Federal, Mexico (Feb. 4, 2008).
Semitropic Water Storage District (SWSD). (2004). Semitropic groundwater banking program, Groundwater Banking, Wasco, Calif., ⟨http://www.semitropic.com/index.htm⟩ (Dec. 31, 2008).
Seiber, J. (2006). WEAP—Water evaluation and planning system, Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston.
Tae-Woong, K., Valdes, J. B., and Aparicio, J. (2002). “Frequency and spatial characteristics of drought in the Conchos River, Mexico.” Water Int., 27(3), 420–430.
Teasley, R. L., and McKinney, D. C. (2005). “Modeling the forgotten river segment of the Rio Grande/Bravo basin.” CRWR Online Rep. No. 05-12, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). (2003). Memo regarding channel losses for the Rio Grande basin, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). (2005a). Rio Grande water master program, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). (2005b). Water availability models, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). (2006). Texas administrative code, Title 30: Environmental quality, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, Tex., Pt. 1, Chap. 303, Subchapter C.
Thomas, G. A., Brown, D. L., Pinhey, N. A., Spaletta, J. L., and Kiel, P. (2001). Designing successful groundwater banking programs in the central valley: Lessons from experience, National Heritage Institute, San Francisco.
Thomas, G. A., and McKinney, D. C. (2006). “A physical assessment of the opportunities for improved management of the water resources of the bi-national river basin.” Rio Grande/Bravo Project Description, Natural Heritage Institute, San Francisco.
Vigerstol, K. (2002). “Drought management in Mexico’s Rio Bravo basin.” MS thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Wagner, A. I., and Vaquero, J. E. (2002). Modelo dinámico para el análisis de escenarios prospectivos en la Cuenca del Río Conchos. Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico.
Willmott, C. J., et al. (1985). “Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models.” J. Geophys. Res., 90, 8995–9005.
World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2007). World’s top 10 rivers at risk, World Wildlife Fund International, Gland, Switzerland.
Yates, D., Sieber, J., Purkey, D. R., and Huber-Lee, A. (2005). “WEAP21—A demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: Part 1. Model characteristics.” Water Int., 30, 487–500.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137Issue 1January 2011
Pages: 62 - 71

History

Received: Apr 10, 2009
Accepted: Apr 11, 2010
Published online: May 4, 2010
Published in print: Jan 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Samuel Sandoval-Solis [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail: [email protected]
Daene C. McKinney, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Rebecca L. Teasley, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Irivate Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]
Carlos Patino-Gomez [email protected]
Subcoordinador de Gestión Integrada del Agua, Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua, Paseo Cuauhnahuac 8532, Jiutepec Morelos 62550, Mexico. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share