TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 16, 2009

Simulation-Optimization Framework to Support Sustainable Watershed Development by Mimicking the Predevelopment Flow Regime

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 136, Issue 3

Abstract

The modification of land and water resources for human use alters the natural hydrologic flow regime of a downstream receiving body of water. The natural flow regime is essential for sustaining biotic structure and equilibrium within the ecosystem. Best management practices mitigate the increased storm water runoff due to increased imperviousness and are typically designed and located within a watershed to match peak and minimum flows for a small set of targeted design storms. Ecosystems are, however, affected by all the characteristics of a long-term flow regime, including the magnitude, duration, frequency, and timing of flows. A more environmentally sustainable approach for watershed development is presented based on the minimization of differences in the characteristics of the flow regime between predevelopment and postdevelopment conditions. The indicator of hydrologic alteration (IHA) is a set of 33 hydrologic indices that characterize a flow regime and, coupled with the range of variability approach (RVA), can be used to evaluate a development strategy for its alteration of the long-term hydrologic flow regime. This paper presents a methodology to identify watershed management strategies that will have a minimal impact on the flow regime and downstream ecosystems. This methodology utilizes a metric that evaluates development strategies based on an IHA/RVA analysis implemented within a simulation-optimization framework. Continuous simulation of urban runoff for different land use strategies is enabled through the use of the storm water management model, and the resulting long-term hydrograph is analyzed using IHA/RVA. Development is allocated within subcatchments to maintain a predefined minimum level of total development while minimizing the hydrologic alteration. A hybrid optimization approach based on genetic algorithm and Nelder-Meade approaches is used to identify optimal land use allocation. Further analysis is conducted to identify alternative development patterns that allocate impervious development maximally differently among subcatchments while achieving similarly low alteration in the hydrologic flow regime.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bain, M. B., Finn, J. T., and Brooke, H. E. (1988). “Streamflow regulation and fish community structure.” Ecology, 69, 382–392.
Baron, J. S., Poff, N. L., Angermeier, P. L., Dahm, C. N., Gleick, P. H., Hairston, N. G., Jr., Jackson, R. B., Johnston, C. A., Richter, B. D., and Steinman, A. D. (2002). “Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater.” Ecol. Appl., 12, 1247–1260.
Baron, J. S., Poff, N. L., Angermeier, P. L., Dahm, C. N., Gleick, P. H., Hairston, N. G., Jr., Jackson, R. B., Johnston, C. A., Richter, B. D., and Steinman, A. D. (2003). Sustaining healthy freshwater ecosystems, Ecological Society of America, Washington, D.C.
Behera, P., Papa, F., and Adams, B. (1999) “Optimization of regional storm-water management systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 125(2), 107–114.
Bertrand-Krajewski, J. -L., Barrauda, S., and Chocata, B. (2000). “Need for improved methodologies and measurements for sustainable management of urban water systems.” Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev., 20(3), 323–331.
Black, A. R., Rowan, J. S., Duck, R. W., Bragg, O. M., and Clelland, B. E. (2005). “DHRAM: A method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC water framework.” Aquatic Conservation, 15, 427–446.
Bragg, D. M., Black, A. R., Duck, R. W., and Rowan, J. S. (2005). “Approaching the physical-biological interface in rivers: A review of methods for ecological evaluation of flow regimes.” Prog. Phys. Geogr., 29, 506–531.
Brill, E. D. (1979). “The use of optimization models in public-sector planning.” Manage. Sci., 25, 413–422.
Brill, E. D., Jr., Chang, S. -Y., and Hopkins, L. D. (1982). “Modeling to generate alternatives: The HSJ approach and an illustration using a problem in land use planning.” Manage. Sci., 28(3), 221–235.
Brill, E. D., Jr., Flach, J. M., Hopkins, L. D., and Ranjithan, S. (1990). “MGA: A decision support system for complex, incompletely defined problems.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 20(4), 745–757.
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., and Smith, V. H. (1998). Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorous and nitrogen, Ecological Society of America, Washington, D.C.
Chelouah, R., and Siarry, P. (2003). “Genetic and Nelder-Mead algorithms hybridized for a more accurate global optimization of continuous multi-minima functions.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 148, 335–345.
DeBrey, L. D., and Lockwood, J. A. (1990). “Effects of sediment and flow regime on the aquatic insects of a high mountain stream.” Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 5, 241–250.
Dynesius, M., and Nilsson, C. (1994). “Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.” Science, 266, 753–762.
Edgerly, J. L. (2006). “Quantifying urban-induced flow regime alteration using mathematical models and hydrologic metrics.” MS thesis, Colorado State University.
Elkins, D. (2001). “An analysis of historic flows in the Satilla River using two statistical methods.” Proc. of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conf., Kathryn J. Hatcher, ed., Institute Ecology, The Univ. of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
Espinoza, F., Minsker, B. S., and Goldberg, D. E. (2005). “Adaptive hybrid genetic algorithm for groundwater remediation design.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131(1), 14–24.
Fan, C., and Li, J. (2004). “A modeling analysis of urban stormwater flow regimes and their implication for stream erosion.” Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 39(4), 356–361.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Harrell, L. J., and Ranjithan, S. (1998) “Generation of alternative strategies for insightful decision making in watershed management,” Proc., 25th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conf. ASCE, Chicago, Ill.
Harrell, L. J., and Ranjithan, S. (2003). “Integrated detention pond design and land use planning for watershed management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(2), 98–106.
Hendry, K., and Cragg-Hine, D. (1996). Restoration of riverine salmon habitats, Environment Agency, Bristol.
Kirby, C. W. (2003). “Benthic macroinvertebrate response to post-development stream hydrology and hydraulics.” Ph.D. thesis, George Mason University.
Kluitenberg, E. H., and Pribak, M. (1996). Development and Calibration of the Rouge Watershed Water Quantity Models.
Kobayashi, T., Shiel, R. J., Gibbs, P., and Dixon, P. I. (1998). “Freshwater zooplankton in the Hawkesbury-Nepean River: Comparison of community structure with other rivers.” Hydrobiologia, 377, 133–145.
Lillehammer, A., and Saltveit, S. (1984). Regulated rivers, Univ. of Oslo, Oslo.
Lobo, F., and Goldberg, D. E. (1997). “Decision making in a hybrid genetic algorithm.” Proc. of the 1997 IEEE Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation IEEE, New York, 121–125.
Mathews, R., and Richter, B. D. (2007). “Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(6), 1400–1413.
The Nature Conservancy. (2007). “Indicators of hydrologic alteration user’s manual” ⟨http://www.nature.org/initiatives/freshwater/conservationtools/art17004.html⟩ (May 1, 2009).
Nelder, J. A., and Mead, R. (1965). “A simplex method for function minimization.” Comput. J., 7, 308–313.
Perez-Pedini, C., Limbrunner, J. F., and Vogel, R. M. (2005). “Optimal location of infiltration-based best management practices for storm water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131(6), 441–448.
Poff, N. L., and Allan, J. D. (1995). “Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability.” Ecology, 76, 606–627.
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., and Stromberg, J. C. (1997). “The natural flow regime.” BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J., Powell, J., and Braun, D. (1996). “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conserv. Biol., 10, 1163–1174.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Braun, D. P., and Powell, J. (1998). “A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network.” Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 14(4), 329–340.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Wigington, R., and Braun, D. P. (1997). “How much water does a river need?” Freshwater Biol., 37(1), 231–249.
Rood, S. B., and Mahoney, J. M. (1990). “Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: Probable causes and prospects for mitigation.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 14, 451–464.
Rossman, L. A. (2004). Storm water management model user’s manual, Version 5.0, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
Rouge River Wet Weather Demonstration Project. (2004). “The Rouge River Project: Bringing the river back to life!” ⟨www.rougeriver.com⟩ (July 1, 2008).
Ruse, L., and Love, A. (1997). “Predicting phytoplankton composition in the River Thames, England.” Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 13, 171–183.
Scoggins, M. (2000). Proc. of the Effects of Hydrologic Variability on Biological Assessments in Streams in Austin, Tex., Watershed Protection Department, Austin.
Shaw, D. T. (2001). Internal Rep. on the Impacts of Upstream Dams, Groundwater Withdrawals and Climate Variability on Baseflows of Altamaha River, Georgia, The Nature Conservancy, Altamaha River Bioreserve, Darian, Ga.
Shiau, J., and Wu, F. (2004). “Assessment of hydrologic alterations caused by Chi-Chi diversion weir in Chou-Shui Creek, Taiwan: Opportunities for restoring natural flow conditions.” River. Res. Appl., 20, 401–412.
Shiau, J., and Wu, F. (2006). “Compromise programming methodology for determining instream flow under multiobjective water allocation criteria.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(5), 1179–1191.
Smith, E., Kluitenberg, E., Hughes, C., and Catalfio, C. (2000). “Baseline data summary for the rouge river watershed.” Technical Rep. No. RPO-WMGT-TM45, ⟨http://www.rougeriver.com/pdfs/sampling/RPO-WMGT-TM45/Intro-Sect2.pdf⟩ (July 1, 2008).
Sparks, R. E. (1995). “Need for ecosystem management of large riversand their floodplains.” BioScience, 45, 168–182.
Sprouse, W. L., and Mendoza, G. A. (1990). “Modeling to generate alternatives: A Shawnee national forest example.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 14, 203–211.
Stanford, J. A., Ward, J. V., Liss, W. J., Frissell, C. A., Williams, R. N., Lichatowich, J. A., and Coutant, C. C. (1996). “A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers.” Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 12, 391–413.
Suen, J. P., and Eheart, J. W. (2006). “Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03417.
Tang, Z., Engel, B., Lim, K., Pijanowski, B., and Harbor, J. (2005). “Minimizing the impact of urbanization on long term runoff.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41, 1347–1359.
Tennant, D. L. (1976). “Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation, and related environmental resources.” Fisheries, 1(4), 6–10.
U.S. EPA. (1993). “Urban runoff pollution prevention and control planning.” Rep. No. EPA/625/R-93/004.
U.S. EPA. (2004). “The use of best management practices (BMPs) in urban watersheds.” Rep. No. EPA/600/R-04/184.
Vieira, J. M. P., Pinho, J. L. S., and Duarte, A. A. L. (1998). “Eutrophication vulnerability analysis: A case study.” Water Sci. Technol., 37, 121–128.
Vogel, R. M., and Fennessey, N. M. (1995). “Flow duration curves II: A review of applications in water resources planning.” Water Resour. Bull., 31(6), 1029–1039.
Vogel, R. M., Sieber, J., Archfield, S. A., Smith, M. P., Apse, C. D., and Huber-Lee, A. (2007). “Relations among storage, yield, and instream flow.” Water Resour. Res., 43(5), W05403.
Walker, J., Diamond, M., and Naura, M. (2002). “The development of physical quality objectives for rivers in England and Wales.” Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 12, 381–390.
Ward, J. V., and Stanford, J. (1983) “Intermediate-disturbance hypothesis: An explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems.” Dynamics of lotic systems, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich., 347–356.
Wilby, R. L., Cranston, L. E., and Darby, E. J. (1998). “Factors governing macrophyte status in Hampshire chalk streams: Implications for catchment management.” J. Inst. Water Environ. Manag., 12, 179–187.
Yeh, C. H., and Labadie, J. W. (1997). “Multi-objective watershed-level planning of storm water detention systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 123, 336–343.
Zhen, X. Y., Yu, S. L., and Lin, J. Y. (2004). “Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins at watershed scale.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130, 339–347.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 136Issue 3May 2010
Pages: 366 - 375

History

Received: Dec 18, 2008
Accepted: Jul 14, 2009
Published online: Jul 16, 2009
Published in print: May 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Laurel Reichold [email protected]
Environmental Engineer, Jacksonville District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville, FL. E-mail: [email protected]
Emily M. Zechman [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
E. Downey Brill [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., CB 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695. E-mail: [email protected]
Hillary Holmes [email protected]
Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share