Case Studies
Sep 12, 2022

Research on Correlation between Spatial Quality of Urban Streets and Pedestrian Walking Characteristics in China Based on Street View Big Data

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 4

Abstract

Recently, China’s urban construction has gradually shifted from incremental development to quality improvement, and urban residents’ demand for a better travel environment has become stronger. Therefore, as the main carrier of urban slow traffic and an important part of public space, streets are gradually becoming the focus of urban planning. This study starts from the perspective of the residents’ needs and selects the measurement indicators from multiple dimensions. The combination of big data analysis and field observations makes up for the shortcomings in the subjective methods, single measurement dimensions, and low data accuracy in previous studies and provides a comprehensive measurement method for the spatial quality of typical streets in China, and provides theoretical support and a scientific basis for urban sustainable development. This study used the Bijiashan Block, Hefei, Anhui Province, China, as an example. Based on the street view big data and technologies, such as point of interest (POI) spatial analysis, road network accessibility analysis, and machine learning algorithm, this study conducted a quantitative evaluation of the street space quality from four dimensions: (1) visual perception; (2) functional attribute; (3) road network structure; and (4) spatial form. In addition, quantitative measurements of pedestrian walking characteristics are conducted based on pedestrian flow rate and walking speed. Correlation and regression analyses are adopted to explore the correlation between street space quality and pedestrian walking characteristics and the impact of each indicator. The results indicate that street richness, green visibility, POI density, and vehicle interference degree show a significant correlation with walking characteristics and indicators, such as street accessibility and functional mixing degree that are believed by the public to affect walking characteristics show no significant correlation with street scale.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52008143) and the Anhui Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project (AHSKY2021D74).

References

Abedo, M., M. Salheen, and A. Elshater. 2020. “The dawn of walkability.” In Humanising cities through car-free city development and transformation, edited by R. Doheim, A. Farag, and E. Kamel, 100–104. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Cervero, R., O. L. Sarmiento, E. Jacoby, L. F. Gomez, and A. Neiman. 2009. “Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 3 (4): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310802178314.
Chan, E. T. H., T. E. Li, T. Schwanen, and D. Banister. 2021. “People and their walking environments: An exploratory study of meanings, place and times.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 15 (9): 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1793437.
Choi, E. 2014. “Walkability and the complexity of walking behavior.” ITU J. Fac. Archit. 11 (2): 87–99.
Erlangga, D., D. Handayani, and Syafi. 2021. “Analysis of walkability index and handling of pedestrian facilities of Slamet Riyadi Street, Surakarta.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1858 (1): 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1858/1/012011.
Fan, W., and N. Salazar. 2016. “Evaluation on traditional commercial street space quality of tourism ancient town in China—A case of Xing'ping town.” Int. J. Econ. Fin. Manage. Sci. 4 (5): 314–320. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160405.23.
Gehl, J. 1980. “The residential street environment.” Built Environ. 6 (1): 51–61.
Greenwald, M. J., and M. G. Boarnet. 2001. “Built environment as determinant of walking behavior: Analyzing nonwork pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1780 (1): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.3141/1780-05.
Hoerl, A. E., and R. W. Kennard. 2000. “Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems.” Technometrics 12 (1): 13.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of American cities. New York: Random House.
Jacobs-Crisioni, C., P. Rietveld, E. Koomen, and E. Tranos. 2014. “Evaluating the impact of land-use density and mix on spatiotemporal urban activity patterns: An exploratory study using mobile phone data.” Environ. Plann. A 46 (11): 2769–2785. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130309p.
Judea, P., and D. Mackenzie. 2018. “Mind over data.” Significance 15 (4): 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01165.x.
Jiang, B., and A. Okabe. 2014. “Different ways of thinking about street net-works and spatial analysis.” Geog. Anal. 46 (4): 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12060.
Koohsari, M. J., N. Owen, E. Cerin, B. Giles-Corti, and T. Sugiyama. 2016. “Walkability and walking for transport: Characterizing the built environment using space syntax.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 13 (1): 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0448-9.
Lamit, H. B., A. Shafaghat, M. Z. A. Majid, A. Keyvanfar, M. H. B. Ahmad, and T. A. Malik. 2013. “The path walkability index (PAWDEX) model: To measure built environment variables influencing residents’ walking behavior.” J. Adv. Sci. Lett. 19 (10): 3017–3020.
Lee, E., and J. Dean. 2018. “Perceptions of walkability and determinants of walking behaviour among urban seniors in Toronto, Canada.” J. Transp. Health 9: 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.03.004.
Li, X., P. Santi, T. K. Courtney, S. K. Verma, and C. Ratti. 2018. “Investigating the association between streetscapes and human walking activities using Google Street View and human trajectory data.” J. Trans. GIS 22 (4): 1029–1044.
Liu, X., Q. Sheng, and Z. Yang. 2017. “The impact of pedestrian accessibility on block spatial vitality and interaction.” J. Shanghai Urban Plann. 4 (1): 56–61.
Maniat, M., C. V. Camp, and A. Kashani. 2021. “Deep learning-based visual crack detection using Google Street View images.” J. Neural Comput. Appl. 33 (21): 1–18.
McAlexander, K. M., S. K. Mama, A. Medina, D. P. O’Connor, and R. E. Lee. 2011. “The concordance of directly and indirectly measured built environment attributes and physical activity adoption.” J. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 8: 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-72.
Mezoued, A. M., Q. Letesson, and V. Kaufmann. 2021. “Making the slow metropolis by designing walkability: A methodology for the evaluation of public space design and prioritizing pedestrian mobility.” Urban Res. Pract. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1875038.
Nagata, S., T. Nakaya, T. Hanibuchi, S. Amagasa, H. Kikuchi, and S. Inoue. 2020. “Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: Statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of Google Street View images.” Health Place 66: 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428.
Nesoff, E. D., K. M. Pollack, M. Bailey, and A. C. Gielen. 2019. “Knowledge and beliefs about pedestrian safety in an urban community: Implications for promoting safe walking.” J. Commun. Health 44 (1): 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0559-0.
Omer, I., and R. Goldblatt. 2012. “Urban spatial configuration and socio-economic residential differentiation: The case of Tel Aviv.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 36 (2): 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.09.003.
Roger, T. 1986. Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Si, R., Y. Lin, and Z. Xiao. 2021. “Spatio-temporal analysis of built environment and street vitality relationship based on street-level imagery: A case study of Futian District, Shenzhen.” Geog. Sci. 41 (9): 1536–1545.
Sung, H., and S. Lee. 2015. “Residential built environment and walking activity: Empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 41: 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.009.
Sung, H., S. Lee, and S. Jung. 2014. “Identifying the relationship between the objectively measured built environment and walking activity in the high-density and transit-oriented city, Seoul, Korea.” J. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 41 (4): 637–660.
Ta, N., Y. Zeng, Q. Zhu, and J. Wu. 2020. “Relationship between built environment and urban vitality in Shanghai downtown area based on big data.” Geog. Sci. 40 (1): 60–68.
Tasinki. 2015. A sense of place. Exploring the potentials and possible uses of location based social network data for urban and transportation planning in Turku city centre. Turku Research Programme’s Research Rep. 1/2015. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309489409.
Xue, T., and L. Dai. 2016. “Spatial characteristics and impact factors of urban activities from the perspective of big data – taking the Chengliu Districts of Beijing as an example.” J. Urban Issues 4 (4): 25–30+38.
Yamu, C., A. van Nes, and C. Garau. 2021. “Bill Hillier’s legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394.
Yang, L., X. Wang, G. Sun, and Y. Li. 2020. “Modeling the perception of walking environmental quality in a traffic-free tourist destination.” J. Travel Tourism Marketing 37 (5): 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2019.1598534.
Yue, Y., Y. Zhuang, A. G. O. Yeh, J.-Y. Xie, C.-L. Ma, and Q.-Q. Li. 2017. “Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 31 (4): 658–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1220561.
Zhao, X., R. Zhao, W. Hou, and Q. Bian. 2020. “Study on the correlation between spatial characteristics of residential streets and pedestrian flow based on multi-source open data.” J. Archit. 2: 110–114.
Zhou, X. 2017. “Analysis and application of influencing factors of urban pedestrian environment in Australia – An empirical study of 16 pedestrian spaces in Melbourne.” J. Planner (z2): 197–202.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Dec 22, 2021
Accepted: Jul 5, 2022
Published online: Sep 12, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vice President, Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Liwei Zhao, S.M.ASCE 1171690090 @qq.com
Graduate Student, Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei, China. Email: 1171690090 @qq.com

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share