Case Studies
Aug 11, 2022

Delineating Functional Regions as New Strategic and Spatial Planning Clusters and Identifying Megaregions Based on Intercity Freight Flows and a Composite Economic Index: Case of Turkey

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 4

Abstract

A new realm in spatial planning defies administrative boundaries and adopts larger territories than cities, which encompasses city clusters where cities can both compete and cooperate rather than compete as individual entities. In that regard, various approaches to the delineation of functional regions and “mega” regions have been proposed in time, based on population and employment, the urban landscape, or the interactions between regions in terms of intracity travel or migration flows. This paper proposes a methodology to delineate functional regions as well as megaregions based on the pattern of intercity freight flows and a composite economic indicator, exemplified by a case study of Turkey. A four-step delineation method is proposed in which population and trips are used initially to rank the cities and their hinterlands. Second, hierarchical clustering is carried out to delineate new clusters based on flows, and the resulting clusters are used to delineate functional regions for regional planning purposes. Third, a composite economic indicator (income and wealth index, IWI) is employed to refine and finalize the boundaries, thus ensuring the functional zones’ homogeneity as economic clusters. In the last step, megaregions are pinpointed based on the cities of the functional regions using two criteria: IWI (≥0.4089) and GDP (TRY ≥18.3 million) in 2015. The defined regions represent a new geographical scale in regional planning that can aid the central government in addressing leading regional issues: for example, prioritizing governmental investments that are subsidized by national funds aimed at the alleviation of regional inequalities. A future study may focus on the effect of regional economic inequalities on internal migration flows.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the comments and recommendations of three anonymous reviewers. With their invaluable contributions, the paper was significantly improved. The data were borrowed from the National Transport Master Plan for the Republic of Turkey, EuropeAid/136025/IH/SER/TR. The authors are grateful to the Strategy Development Division of the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure of the Republic of Turkey for providing the necessary data.

References

AASHTO. 2007. Transportation invest in our future: Future needs of the U.S. surface transportation system. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Akin, D., and V. Dökmeci. 2015. “Cluster analysis of interregional migration in Turkey.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (3): 05014016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000223.
Baigent, E. 2004. “Patrick Geddes, Lewis Mumford and Jean Gottmann: Divisions over ‘megalopolis’.” Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28 (6): 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph514oa.
Cats, O., Q. Wang, and Y. Zhao. 2015. “Identification and classification of public transport activity centres in Stockholm using passenger flows data.” J. Transp. Geogr. 48: 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.005.
Chen, W., O. Golubchikov, and Z. Liu. 2021. “Measuring polycentric structures of megaregions in China: Linking morphological and functional dimensions.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 48 (8): 2272–2288. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2399808320974687.
Curry, A. 2021. “Last stand of the hunter-gatherers?” Archeology, May/June, the Archaeological Institute of America. Accessed February 26, 2022. https://www.archaeology.org/issues/422-2105.
Dablanc, L., and C. Ross. 2012. “Atlanta: A mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM).” J. Transp. Geogr. 24: 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.001.
Ducca, F., R. Moeckel, S. Mishra, and T. Weidner. 2012. “A megaregion framework for analyzing a high energy price future.” In Compendium of Papers at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Paper no. 12-3556, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Eick, C. F., N. Zeidat, and Z. Zhao. 2004. “Supervised clustering-algorithms and benefits.” Proc., 16th IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 774–776. New York: IEEE.
Everitt, B. S. 2005. An R and S-PLUS®. companion to multivariate analysis. London: Springer.
Florida, R. 2019. “The real powerhouses that drive the world’s economy.” Bloomberg CityLab. Accessed February 26, 2022. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-28/mapping-the-mega-regions-powering-the-world-s-economy.
Florida, R., T. Gulden, and C. Mellander. 2008. “The rise of the mega-region.” Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 1 (3): 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn018.
Gagniuc, P. A. 2017. Markov chains: From theory to implementation and experimentation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gifford, J., Z. Chen, J. Li, U. Kelekar, N. Zebrowski, and X. Zhou. 2011. “Mega-regions and freight: Evidence from the commodity flow survey and freight analysis framework.” In Compendium of Papers at the 90th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Gottmann, J. 1957. “Megalopolis or the urbanization of the northeastern seaboard.” Econ. Geogr. 33 (3): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/142307.
Gottmann, J. 1961. Megalopolis: The urbanized northeastern seaboard of the United States. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Hagler, Y. 2009. Defining U.S. megaregions: America 2050. New York: Regional Plan Association.
Hardle, W., and L. Simar. 2003. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Springer.
Harrison, J. 2013. “Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks.” Reg. Stud. 47 (1): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.644239.
Harrison, R., D. Johnson, L. Loftus-Otway, N. Hutson, D. Seedah, M. Zhang, and C. Lewis. 2012. Megaregion Freight Planning: A Synopsis, Rep. No. FHWA/TX-11/0-6627-1. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin.
Jones, C. 2007. Perspective on freight congestion. Public Roads, 71. FHWA-HRT-07-005. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration of the U.S. Dept. of Transportation.
Landau, S., and B. S. Everitt. 2004. A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lang, R. E., and A. C. Nelson. 2009. “Megapolitan America: Defining and applying a new geography.” In Megaregions: Planning for global competitiveness, edited by C. L. Ross, 107–126. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mathworks Statistics Toolbox. 2012. Accessed May 30, 2020. http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/cophenet.html.
Meijers, E. 2005. “Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: Is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts?” Urban Stud. 42 (4): 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500060384.
Meyer, M. D. 2007. “Toward a vision for the nation’s surface transportation system: Policies to transcend boundaries and transition to a new era.” In The National Roundtable on Surface Transportation. Tarrytown, NY: Regional Plan Association and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Mossel, E., and E. Vigoda. 2006. “Limitations of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for Bayesian inference of phylogeny.” Ann. Appl. Probab. 16 (4): 2215–2234. https://doi.org/10.1214/105051600000000538.
Ozus, E., D. Akin, and M. Çiftçi. 2012. “Hierarchical cluster analysis of multicenter development and travel patterns in Istanbul.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (4): 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000121.
Parrot, A. 2021. “Abraham.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Accessed March 13, 2021. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abraham.
Puentes, R. A. 2008. Bridge to somewhere: Rethinking American transportation for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution.
Rodrigue, J. P. 2004. “Freight, gateways and mega-urban regions: The logistical integration of the bostwash corridor.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95 (2): 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.t01-1-00297.x.
Rencher, A. 2002. Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
Ross, C. L., ed. 2009. Megaregions: Planning for global competitiveness. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Ross, C. L., J. Barringer, and J. Yang. 2008. Megaregions: Literature review of the implications for U.S. infrastructure investment and transportation planning. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Ross, C. L., J. Barringer, J. Yang, M. Woo, A. Danner, H. West, A. Amekudzi, and M. Meyer. 2009. Megaregions: Delineating existing and emerging megaregions. Prepared for the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Atlanta: Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development.
Ross, C. L., P. J. Hylton, and D. J.-H. Lee. 2014. “Megaregion planning: State of practice in metropolitan planning organizations and state departments of transportation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2453: 171–177. https://doi.org/10.3141/2453-21.
Ross, C. L., D. J.-H. Lee, and H. West. 2013. Megaregions: Implications of a megaregion approach (deliverable 3). DTFH61-11-C-00003. Atlanta: Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development.
Ross, C. L., and M. Woo. 2009. “Identifying megaregions in the United States: Implications for infrastructure investment.” In Megaregions: Planning for global competitiveness, edited by C. L. Ross, 53–80. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Ross, C. L., and M. Woo. 2010. “A matter of scale: Megaregions and high speed rail.” In Presentation at Associations of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conf. Minneapolis, MN: Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP).
Ross, C. L., and M. Woo. 2011. “Megaregions and mobility.” In Vol. 41 of Urban sustainability: The bridge linking engineering and society, 27–34. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies.
Ross, C. L., M. Woo, and F. Wang. 2016. “Megaregions and regional sustainability.” Int. J. Urban Sci. 20 (3): 299–317.
RPA (Regional Plan Association). 2006. America 2050: A prospectus. New York: RPA.
Sohn, J. 2005. “Are commuting patterns a good indicator of urban spatial structure?” J. Transp. Geogr. 13 (4): 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.005.
Tan, P. N., M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. 2016. Introduction to data mining. London: Pearson Education.
Tiftikcigil, B. Y. 2015. “An assessment on activities of regional development agencies in Turkey.” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 5 (2): 399–409.
Timm, N. H. 2002. Applied multivariate analysis. New York: Springer.
TRSR (Turkish Republic State Railways). 2017. Railways sector report, 2016. Ankara, Turkey: TRSR General Directorate of Operations, Dept. of Strategy Development.
Turkish Exporters’ Council. 2020. “Export report of 2020.” Accessed January 10, 2021. https://www.tim.org.tr/files/downloads/Strateji_Raporlari/%C4%B0hracat%202020%20Raporu.pdf.
TurkStat. 2016a. Population in provinces of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
TurkStat. 2016b. Quality of life index in provinces of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
TurkStat. 2017. Gross domestic product by provinces, 2015–2017. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
TurkStat. 2020a. Lengths of state and province roads under the jurisdictions of the general directorate of Turkish roads. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
TurkStat. 2020b. Domestic migrations of Turkish cities. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
TurkStat. 2020c. Statistics of international migration. TSI News Bulletin, no. 33709. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
Turpin, F. M. 2017. Vol. 1 of National transport master plan. Report Document Version No. 2. Ankara, Turkey: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure.
Wheeler, S. 2009. “Regions, megaregions, and sustainability.” Reg. Stud. 43 (6): 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701861344.
Woo, M., C. L. Ross, and T. D. Boston. 2015. “Do megaregions produce greater regional convergence or divergence? Implications for spatial planning and infrastructure investment.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (1): 1–14.
Worldometer. 2015. “2015 global GDP.” Accessed January 10, 2021. https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/.
Yuksel Project & Belde Project Joint Venture. 2010. Transportation shore structures master plan. Ministry of Transportation, General Directorate of Construction of Railways, Harbors, and Airports.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Sep 28, 2020
Accepted: May 19, 2022
Published online: Aug 11, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Hafr Al Batin, Al Jamiah, Hafr Al-Batin 31911, Saudi Arabia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-0213. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture, Gazi Univ., Maltepe, Ankara 06570, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-1308. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share