Case Studies
May 3, 2022

Perceptual Processes of Children Regarding Their Nearby Home Environments Living in Two Socially Diverse Subcommunities

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

Human life that is collective and diverse on the one hand, but complex and chaotic on the other, is largely experienced in metropolitan cities owing to a significant amount of migration. Istanbul can be defined as a city that constantly witnesses massive influxes of migration and ultimately becomes socially heterogeneous. It was hypothesized in this study that the multilayered urban character of the city affects the perceptions of city-dwellers, especially children. As such, the study focused on the perceptual differences of children living in socially diverse urban settings, and a comparative analysis was conducted to reveal the children’s environmental perceptions regarding their nearby home environments. This case-study-oriented research was conducted with 11-year-old children from two subcommunities both located in the periphery of Istanbul: one from a gecekondu settlement on the fringes of Istanbul, and the other, a planned residential settlement (PRS). The methodology was based on the representations by the children since this methodology has the potential to present an understanding of spatial perception through both quantitative and qualitative dimensions. A representation of children’s houses with their immediate surroundings was requested from the children so that two different cognitive map datasets were obtained regarding two diverse subcommunities. Significant results were obtained in the study, in which gender and settlement type were used as independent variables. As a result, it was revealed that the girls were more inclined to draw their own rooms, were more focused on indoor spaces and were further apt to draw the domestic appliances. When the results were evaluated depending on the settlement type variable, it was revealed that those living in PRS represented indoors more and were specifically focused on their own rooms, while those living in gecekondu settlement tended to draw domestic appliances and outdoor spaces more.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Demet Mutman (Ph.D.) and Dr. Faik Gur (Ph.D.) for their comments, insight, and expert input regarding our manuscript.

References

Apak, S., G. Ulken, and A. Unlu. 2005. “An evaluation of ‘the feeling of security’ in a new mass housing compound in Istanbul.” In Housing, space and quality of life, edited by R. G. Mira, D. Uzzell, J. Eulogio, R. Deus, and J. R. Martinez, 29–39. London: Routledge.
Appleyard, D. 1970. “Styles and methods of structuring a city.” Environ. Behav. 2 (1): 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657000200106.
Ayata, S. 1989. “Toplumsal çevre olarak gecekondu ve apartman.” [In Turkish.] Toplum ve Bilim 46 (47): 101–127.
Ayata, S. 2005. “Yeni orta sınıf ve uydu kent yaşamı.” [In Turkish.] In Kültür Fragmanları Türkiye’de Gündelik Hayat, edited by D. Kandiyoti and A. Saktanber, 37–56. Istanbul, Turkey: Metis.
Barker, R. G. 1968. Ecological psychology concepts and methods for studying human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Basaksehir Rehberi. 2009. “Başakşehir’de uyarıları dikkate alan yok.” Accessed October 14, 2010. http://www.basaksehirrehberi.com/icerik/1626–basaksehir-de-uyarilari-dikkate-alan-yok.
Blakely, E. J., and M. G. Snyder. 1997. Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Canakcioglu, N. G. 2011. “Analysis of perceptual processes of children living in different settled social groups in Istanbul by the method of cognitive maps.” [In Turkish.] M.S. thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul Technical Univ.
Dicle, A. 1983. “Gecekondu: The problems of internal migration and squatter settlements in Turkey.” [In Turkish.] J. South Asian Middle East. Stud. 6 (3): 48–61.
Dovey, K., and R. King. 2011. “Forms of informality: Morphology and visibility of informal settlements.” Built Environ. 37 (1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.37.1.11.
Dowling, R., R. Atkinson, and P. McGuirk. 2010. “Privatism, privatisation and social distinction in master-planned residential estates.” Urban Policy Res. 28 (4): 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2010.508870.
Downs, R. M., and D. Stea. 1973. “Cognitive maps and spatial behaviour: Process and products.” In The map reader: Theories of mapping practice and cartographic representation, edited by M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, and C. Perkins, 312–317. London: Wiley.
Erder, S. 1995. “Yeni kentliler ve kentin yeni yoksulları.” [In Turkish.] Toplum ve Bilim 16: 106–119.
Erkut, G., M. Ocakçı, and A. Unlu. 2001. “Evaluation of crime profile in Istanbul.” Trialog 70: 30–34.
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gifford, R. 2016. Research methods for environmental psychology. New York: Wiley.
Güneş-Ayata, A. 1990. “Gecekondularda Kimlik Sorunu, Dayanışma Örüntüleri ve Hemşehrilik.” [In Turkish.] Toplum ve Bilim 51/52: 89–101.
Haksal, I. 1995. “Comparative study of new settlement areas generated by mass housing.” [In Turkish.] M.S. thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul Technical Univ.
İnalhan, G. 1999. “The effect of communication by design in the formation of environmental image and bahçeşehir case study.” [In Turkish.] M.S. thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul Technical Univ.
Ittelson, W. H. 1970. “The constancies in perceptual theory.” In Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting, edited by H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, and L. G. Rivlin, 112–120. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.
Kandiyoti, D., and A. Bora. 1997. Cariyeler bacılar yurttaşlar: Kimlikler ve toplumsal dönüşümler. Istanbul, Turkey: Metis.
Kaplan, S. 1973a. “Cognitive maps, human needs and the designed environment.” In Environmental design research, edited by W. F. E. Preiser, 275–283. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
Kaplan, S. 1973b. “Cognitive maps in perception and thought.” In Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior, edited by R. M. Downs and D. Stea, 63–78. Chicago: Aldine.
Kaplan, P. 2008. “Bir sıraya dört öğrenci.” Accessed October 28, 2011. http://arsiv.sabah.com.tr/2008/10/01/kaplan.html.
Keyder, Ç. 1999. “The setting.” In Istanbul between the global and the local, edited by K. Çağlar, 3–28. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kosslyn, S. M. 1975. “Information representation in visual images.” Cognit. Psychol. 7 (3): 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90015-8.
Kramer, C. 1982. Village archaeology: Rural Iran in archaeological perspective. New York: Academic.
Lawrence, D. L., and S. M. Low. 1990. “The built environment and spatial form.” Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19 (1): 453–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002321.
Lewin, K. 1951. “Formalization and progress in psychology.” In Field theory in social science, edited by D. Cartwright, 1–29. New York: Harper.
Low, S. 2003. Behind the gates. New York and London: Routledge.
Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Martindale, D. 1984. “Theory of the city.” In Urbanism and urbanization: Views, aspects, and dimensions, edited by N. Iverson, 9–32. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Academic.
Matthews, M. H. 1980. “The mental maps of children: Images of Coventry’s city centre.” Geography 65: 169–179.
Matthews, M. H. 1984. “Environmental cognition of young children: Images of journey to school and home area.” Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 9: 89–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/621869.
Moore, G. T. 1975. “The development of environmental knowing: An overview of an interactional-constructivist theory and some data on within-individual development variations.” In Psychology and the built environment, edited by D. Canter and T. Lee, 184–195. London: Architectural.
Neisser, U. 1976. Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
Nelson, J. M. 1969. Migrants, urban poverty, and instability in developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ.
Oh, I.-S., R. P. Guay, K. Kim, C. M. Harold, J.-H. Lee, C.-G. Heo, and K.-H. Shin. 2014. “Fit happens globally: A meta-analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment Fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across east Asia, Europe, and North America.” Personnel Psychol. 67 (1): 99–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12026.
Park, R. E., E. W. Burgess, and R. D. McKenzie. 1925. The city. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago.
Piaget, J., and B. Inhelder. 1967. The child’s conception of space. New York: Norton Library.
Proshansky, H. M., W. H. Ittelson, and L. G. Rivlin, eds. 1970. Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting, 21–26. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rapoport, A. 1969. House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Siegel, A. W., K. C. Kirasic, and R. Kail. 1978. “Stalking the elusive cognitive map: The development of children’s representations of geographic space.” In Vol. 3 of Children and the environment, edited by I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill, 223–258. New York: Plenum Press.
Simmel, G. 2012. “The metropolis and mental life.” In The urban sociology reader, edited by J. Lin and C. Mele, 37–45. New York: Routledge.
Slattery, M. 2010. Key ideas in sociology. [In English.]. Translated by Ü. Tatlıcan and G. Demiriz. Bursa, Turkey: Sentez.
Spengler, O. 1928. Decline of the west. Volume II: Perspectives of world-history. Translated by C. F. Atkinson. New York: Alfred A.
Tas, H. I., and D. R. Lightfoot. 2005. “Gecekondu settlements in Turkey: Rural–urban migration in the developing European periphery.” J. Geogr. 104 (6): 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340508978648.
Terborg, J. R. 1981. “Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 6: 569–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/257635.
Timeturk. 2009. “İstanbul’da öğrencilerin yol çilesi.” Accessed October 14, 2010. https://www.timeturk.com/tr/2009/02/12/istanbul-da-ogrencilerin-yol-cilesi.html.
Tolman, E. C. 1948. “Cognitive maps in rats and men.” Psychol. Rev. 55 (4): 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626.
Tönnies, F. 2001. Community and civil society. Translated by J. Harris and M. Hollis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.
Tversky, B. 1993. “Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models.” In Vol. 716 of Spatial information theory a theoretical basis for GIS COSIT 1993, edited by A. U. Frank and I. Campari, 14–24. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer.
Unlu, A., and H. Cakir. 2002. “A study on perception of primary school children in home environment.” J. Archit. Plann. Res. 19 (3): 231–246.
Watson, P. J. 1979. Archaeological ethnography in western Iran. Viking Fund Publ. Anthropol. No. 57. Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona.
Wirth, L. 1938. “Urbanism as a way of life.” Am. J. Sociol. 44 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/217913.
World Bank. 2020. “Population living in slums.” Accessed March 29, 2020. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.SLUM.UR.ZS

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 3September 2022

History

Received: Jul 28, 2021
Accepted: Mar 10, 2022
Published online: May 3, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 3, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Ozyegin Univ. Nisantepe District, Orman St., Cekmekoy 34794, Istanbul (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-3601. Email: [email protected]
Alper Unlu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Ozyegin Univ. Nisantepe District, Orman St., Cekmekoy 34794, Istanbul. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share