Technical Papers
May 6, 2022

Entropy-Based Diversity Quantification of Multimodal Transportation Systems: Physical Infrastructure Perspective versus Travel Behavior Perspective

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

Multimodal transportation serves diverse needs and enhances the efficiency and fairness in travel. Despite the increased demands in multimodal transportation development, there lacks a comprehensive framework and associated quantitative methodology to assess the level of diversity of a multimodal transportation system. To this end, the objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive framework to assess the diversity of a multimodal transportation system from both physical infrastructure perspective and travel behavior perspective. From the physical infrastructure perspective, the functional richness and evenness of each transportation mode in an area are calculated and aggregated into one diversity measurement using the entropy weight method. From the travel behavior perspective, the diversity of travelers’ behaviors in an area is quantified based on the number of trips made by each mode using the entropy method. The proposed framework was implemented in a case study of the city of Hartford, CT. The physical infrastructure diversity and travel behavior diversity of multimodal transportation systems in six zip code areas of Hartford were calculated and compared. The case study results showed that the physical infrastructure diversity and travel behavior diversity revealed similar trends in most areas in the case study, with some exceptions which could potentially be explained by sociodemographic factors of different areas. The proposed framework could help transportation planners and decision-makers in obtaining a holistic understanding of the diversity level of a multimodal transportation system, considering urban planning strategies to enhance diversity in travel.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by USDOT Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE). The opinions expressed in this paper represent those of the authors and not necessarily those of CAMMSE.

References

Amoaning-Yankson, S., and A. Amekudzi-Kennedy. 2017. “Transportation system resilience: Opportunities to expand from principally technical to sociotechnical approaches.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2604 (1): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2604-04.
Boske, L. B. (1998). Multimodal/intermodal transportation in the United States, Western Europe, and Latin America: Governmental policies, plans, and programs. PRP 130. Austin, TX: LBJ School of Public Affairs.
Bulla, L. 1994. “An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure.” Oikos 70 (1): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545713.
City of Hartford. 2019. “Hartford Data.” Accessed October 16, 2019. https://openhartford-hartfordgis.opendata.arcgis.com.
Comeau, C. 2009. “Moving beyond the automobile: Multimodal transportation planning in Bellingham, Washington.” Practicing Planner 7 (3): 1–16.
CTDOT (Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). 2020. “Transit-Oriented Development.” Accessed August 21, 2020. https://portal.ct.gov/DOT/Transit-Oriented-Development/Transit-Oriented-Development-Home-Page.
CTrides. 2019. “Ways to Commute.” Accessed October 25, 2019. https://ctrides.com/ways-to-commute/carpool.
DECD (Connecticut Department of Economic Community Development). 2016. “Connecticut Population: Land Area and Density by Location.” Accessed August 21, 2020. https://portal.ct.gov/DECD/Content/About_DECD/Research-and-Publications/01_Access-Research/Population-Data.
Elias, A. 2011. “Automobile-oriented or complete street? Pedestrian and bicycle level of service in the new multimodal paradigm.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2257 (1): 80–86. https://doi.org/10.3141/2257-09.
Farhadi, M. 2015. “Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 74: 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.006.
Feng, C.-M., and C.-H. Hsieh. 2009. “Implications of transport diversity for quality of life.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 135 (1): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(13).
Fischer, J. M., and A. Amekudzi. 2011. “Quality of life, sustainable civil infrastructure, and sustainable development: Strategically expanding choice.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000039.
He, Y., H. Guo, M. Jin, and P. Ren. 2016. “A linguistic entropy weight method and its application in linguistic multi-attribute group decision making.” Nonlinear Dyn. 84 (1): 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2595-y.
Heinen, E., J. Panter, R. Mackett, and D. Ogilvie. 2015. “Changes in mode of travel to work: A natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0239-8.
Konduri, K. C., C. Ritter, J. Lynch, N. E. Lownes, and E. Greene. 2017. Connecticut statewide transportation study. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Li, J., K. Lo, and M. Guo. 2018. “Do socio-economic characteristics affect travel behavior? A comparative study of low-carbon and non-low-carbon shopping travel in Shenyang City, China.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (7): 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071346.
Lin, J. 1991. “Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37 (1): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.61115.
Lin, T., D. Wang, and X. Guan. 2017. “The built environment, travel attitude, and travel behavior: Residential self-selection or residential determination?” J. Transp. Geog. 65 (October): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.004.
Litman, T. 2017. Evaluating transportation diversity. Victoria, BC, Canada. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Liu, H., T. Li, R. Hu, Y. Fu, J. Gu, and H. Xiong. 2019. “Joint representation learning for multi-modal transportation recommendation.” Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 33: 1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011036.
Machado-León, J. L., and A. Goodchild. 2017. “Review of performance metrics for community-based planning for resilience of the transportation system.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2604 (1): 44–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/2604-06.
Martin, E., S. Shaheen, I. Zohdy, N. Chan, A. Bansal, A. Bhattacharyya, A. Tawfik, B. Yelchuru, R. Finson, and C. Y. Y. Wah. 2016. Understanding travel behavior: Research scan. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration.
Mason, N. W. H., D. Mouillot, W. G. Lee, and J. B. Wilson. 2005. “Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity.” Oikos 111 (1): 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13886.x.
McKenzie, B. 2014. Modes less traveled: Commuting by bicycle and walking in the United States, 2008–2012. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Mihyeon Jeon, C., and A. Amekudzi. 2005. “Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 11 (1): 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(31).
Mindell, J., H. Rutter, and S. Watkins. 2011. “Transportation: Impact on human health: Urban transportation.” In Encyclopaedia of environmental health, edited by J. Nriagu, 578–589. Oxford: Elsevier.
Mouillot, D., N. A. J. Graham, S. Villéger, N. W. H. Mason, and D. R. Bellwood. 2013. “A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances.” Trends Ecol. Evol. 28 (3): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004.
Mouillot, D., W. H. N. Mason, O. Dumay, and J. B. Wilson. 2005. “Functional regularity: A neglected aspect of functional diversity.” Oecologia 142 (3): 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1744-7.
Ng, W.-S., and A. Acker. 2018. Understanding urban travel behaviour by gender for efficient and equitable transport policies. Paris: International Transport Forum.
Rahimi Golkhandan, A. 2020. Characterization and assessment of transportation diversity: Impacts on mobility and resilience planning in urban communities. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
Rahimi-Golkhandan, A., M. J. Garvin, and B. L. Brown. 2019. “Characterizing and measuring transportation infrastructure diversity through linkages with ecological stability theory.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 128 (August 2018): 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.013.
Su, S., R. Xiao, D. Li, and Y. Hu. 2014. “Impacts of transportation routes on landscape diversity: A comparison of different route types and their combined effects.” Environ. Manage. 53 (3): 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0214-6.
Thakuriah, R., and P. Metaxatos. 2000. “Effect of residential location and access to transportation on employment opportunities.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1726: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.3141/1726-04.
USCB (U.S. Census Bureau). 2018. 2013–2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, Table DP05. “ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates.” Accessed August 21, 2020. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=Hartford city, Connecticut&g=1600000US0937000&tid=ACSDP5Y2017.DP05.
Villéger, S., N. W. H. Mason, and D. Mouillot. 2008. “New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology.” Ecology 89 (8): 2290–2301. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1206.1.
Wang, D.-H., R.-H. Yao, and C. Jing. 2006. “Entropy models of trip distribution.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 132 (1): 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:1(29).
Williams, K. M., T. Claridge, and A. Carroll. 2016. Multimodal transportation planning curriculum for urban planning programs. Portland, OR: National Institute for Transportation and Communities.
Zhu, J., L. Zhang, and Z. Ren. 2020a. “A conceptual framework for understanding the relationships between transportation infrastructure and human resilience.” In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability, 361–369. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhu, Y., D. Tian, and F. Yan. 2020b. “Effectiveness of entropy weight method in decision-making.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2020: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3564835.
Zou, Z.-H., Y. Yi, and J.-N. Sun. 2006. “Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment.” J. Environ. Sci. 18 (5): 1020–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 3September 2022

History

Received: May 23, 2021
Accepted: Mar 2, 2022
Published online: May 6, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zheng Ren, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., Storrs, CT 06269. Email: [email protected]
Giovanna Fusco, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., Storrs, CT 06269. Email: [email protected]
Nicholas Lownes [email protected]
Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., Storrs, CT 06269. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., Storrs, CT 06269 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-5841. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Mobility as a Service (MaaS) as a Sustainability Concept for Tourist Destinations, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14127512, 14, 12, (7512), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share