Relationship between Spatial Analysis of Streets and Walking Behavior
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 2
Abstract
There is diversity and complexity in the spatial analysis that encompasses the analytical perspectives of social segregation in new communities. This research aims to explore the correlations that could predict potentials for walkable environments as a contributor to minimizing social segregation in new communities. The research addresses the spatial configuration analysis of street networks, using space syntax as well as the ground floor use considering the spatiotemporal dimension. The study was conducted in Sheikh Zayed City, a new community in the Greater Cairo Region, Egypt. Various theories and methods use space syntax in practice and empirical research to analyze the spatial relationships in the physical built environment. This research explores the predictive power of space syntax and introduces mixed methods to better investigate the significant relationships between walking behavior and street spatial analysis. The syntactic measures of the streets (global and local integration, choice, and connectivity) are articulated, and ground floor use [using geographic information system (GIS)] is overlaid. Walking behavior is recorded at different times of the week, incorporating the purpose of pedestrian trips, and added in the correlational analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) followed by multiple regression analysis reveals the explanatory results of relations between the spatial variables for predictable actions. The research findings deduced that ground floor use distribution could predict walking behavior and trip purposes at different times of the week while street syntactic measures vary in their explanatory power on walking behavior, especially when considering the time of the day dimension. Thus, the study concludes that space syntax as an analytic tool should be complemented by other methods that address a wider spectrum of variables pertaining to spatial street properties. The proposed combination of methods can better guide street design, create more walkable communities, and achieve social integration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abedo, M., M. Salheen, and A. Elshater. 2020. “The dawn of walkability.” In Humanising cities through car-free city development and transformation, edited by R. Doheim, A. Farag, and E. Kamel, 100–104. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Al Sayed, K., A. Turner, B. Hillier, S. Lida, and A. Penn. 2014. SpaceSyntax methodology. London: Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL.
Baran, P. K., D. A. Rodríguez, and A. J. Khattak. 2008. “Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods.” J. Urban Des. 13 (1): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701803498.
Brown, B., I. Yamada, K. Smith, C. Zick, L. Jones, and J. Fan. 2009. “Mixed land use and walkability: Variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity.” Health Place 15 (4): 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.008.
Can, I., and T. Heath. 2016. “In-between spaces and social interaction: A morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax.” J. Hous. Built Environ. 31 (1): 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9442-9.
Cervero, R., O. Sarmiento, E. Jacoby, L. Gomez, and A. Neiman. 2009. “Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 3 (4): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310802178314.
Choi, E. 2014. “Walkability and the complexity of walking behavior.” ITU J Facul. Archit. 11 (2): 87–99.
Christian, H. E., F. C. Bull, N. J. Middleton, M. W. Knuiman, M. L. Divitini, P. Hopper, A. Amarasinghe, and B. Giles-Corti. 2011. “How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study.” J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 8 (1): 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-55.
Gerus, K., and B. van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility evaluation of land-use transport strategies: Reviews and research directions.” J. Transp. Geogr. 12 (2): 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature and the politics of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The social logic of the space. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. 1996. “Cities as movement economies.” Urban Des. Int. 1 (1): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1996.5.
Hillier, B. 2008. Bill hillier mapping method: Basis of space syntax technique. London: Space Syntax Laboratory.
Hillier, B., and S. Iida S. 2005. “Network and psychological effects in urban movement” Vol. 3693 of Spatial information theory, edited by A. G. Cohn and D. M. Mark. COSIT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11556114_30.
Huang, Q., and D. W. S. Wong. 2016. “Activity patterns, socio-economic status and urban spatial structure: What can social media data tell us?” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 30 (9): 1873–1898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1145225.
Klarqvist, B. 2015. “A space syntax glossary.” In Suburban urbanities: Suburbs and the life of high street, edited by L. Vaughan. London: UCL Press.
Kockelman, K. M. 1997. “Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay area.” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1607 (1): 116–125. https://doi.org/10.3141/1607-16.
Koohsari, M. J., T. Sugiyama, S. Mavoa, K. Villanueva, H. Badland, B. Giles-Corti, and N. Owen. 2016. “Street network measures and adults’ walking for transport: Application of space syntax.” Health Place 38: 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.12.009.
Legaby, A. 2010. “From housing segregation to integration in public space.” In Proc., of the 7th Int. Space Syntax Symp. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254396126_From_Housing_Segregation_to_Integration_in_Public_Space.
Jiang, B., and A. Okabe. 2014. “Different ways of thinking about street networks and spatial analysis.” Geogr. Anal. 46 (4): 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12060.
Litman, T. 2014. Analysis of public policies that unintentionally encourage and subsidize urban sprawl. NCE cities—Sprawl subsidy report. Victoria, BC, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Litman, T. 2017. “Determining optimal urban expansion, population and vehicle density, and housing types for rapidly growing cities.” Transp. Res. Procedia 18. https://www.vtpi.org/WCTR_OC.pdf.
Mavoa, S., S. Eagleson, H. Badland, L. Gunn, C. Boulange, J. Stewart, and B. Giles-Corti. 2018. “Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index.” J. Transp. Land Use 11 (1): 681–700. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1132.
Matthews, S., and T. Yang. 2013. “Spatial polygamy and contextual exposure(SPACEs): Promoting activity space approaches in research on place and health.” Am. Behav. Sci. 57 (8): 1057–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487345.
Mishra, S., S. Taraphder, U. Sarkar, and S. Datta. 2017.“Principal component analysis.” Int. J. Livestock Res. 7 (5): 60–78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316652806_Principal_Component_Analysis.
Nakumara, K. 2016. “The spatial relationship between pedestrian flows and street characteristics around multiple destinations.” IATSS Res. 39 (2): 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.08.001.
NUCA 2017. The strategic plan of 6th of October city and Sheikh Zayed (report). Minsitry of Housing and Urban Communities, New Urban Communities Authorities.
Omer, I., and R. Goldblatt. 2012. “Urban spatial configuration and socio-economic residential differentiation: The case of Tel Aviv.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 36 (2): 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.09.003.
Pongsmas, N. 2004. “Configuration of public space and social sustainability of urban neighborhood: A case study of the city of San Diego at the dawn of the twenty-first century.” Ph.D. thesis in land-use planning, management, and design, Texas Tech Univ. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/19502.
Rappaport, A. 1986. Culture, architecture, and design. Accessed September 20, 2021. http://www.egyptarch.gov.eg/sites/default/files/pdf/Books/Culture%20Architecture%26Design.pdf.
Schreiber, J. B. 2021. “Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis.” Res. Soc. Admin. Pharm. 17 (5): 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027.
Shehayeb, D. 2011. Community Oriented Activity Patterns. Urban generation project for historic Cairo (URHC). Accessed March 7, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303383649_Community_Oriented_Activity_Patterns_-_Background_Study_for_the_Urban_Regeneration_of_Historic_Cairo_Project_-_UNESCO.
Shehayeb, D., et al. 2003. “Social, Psychological and Health Aspects of Housing Design and Neighborhood Design.” Academy for Scientific Research & Technology (ASRT). Accessed February 14, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307716371_Crime_Prevention_and_Urban_Space_in_Egypt.
Tadamun. 2016. Egypt's new cities: Neither just nor efficient. Accessed July 20, 2021. http://www.tadamun.co/egypts-new-cities-neither-just-efficient/?lang=en#.Yds7Cy0Rpp8
Takween. 2016. AL-Amrikiyya Area: Assessment and upgrading project, 6th of October City, Egypt. Final report. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://view.joomag.com/livelihood-reports-al-amrikeya-area-final-assessment/0594875001526546367?fbclid=IwAR2ASkren9VoCWbzl5RWVFPMeOG_jNQnotumXVkYAJ56UBiAveyt0RNwYz0.
Tasinki. 2015. A sense of place. Exploring the potentials and possible uses of location based social network data for urban and transportation planning in Turku city centre. Turku research programme’s research report 1/2015. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Space-Syntax-analysis-local-choice_fig5_309489409.
Turner, A. 2004. Depth map 4—A researcher’s handbook. London: Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, UCL. Accessed April 20, 2021. http://archtech.gr/varoudis/depthmapX/LearningMaterial/depthmap4r1.pdf.
Vaughan, L. and S. Griffiths. 2013. A suburb isn’t a tree. Issue 125. Accessed May 25, 2021. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1366640/1/Adaptable%20Suburbs.
Wahdan, D. 2013. Planning Egypt’s new settlements: The politics of spatial inequities. Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo Press. Accessed February 6, 2021. https://aucpress.com/product/planning-egypts-new-settlements-the-politics-of-spatial-inequities/.
Wang, Y., and K. Liu. 2017. “Evolution of urban socio-spatial structure in modern times in Xi’an, China.” J. Sustainability 9 (11): 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111935.
Yamu, C., A. van Nes, and C. Garau. 2021. “Bill Hillier’s legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application.” Sustainability 13: 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394.
Yang, C. 2019. “A new perspective on urban form with the integration of space syntax and MCDA—An exploratory analysis of the city of Xi'an, China.” Master’s thesis, Masters of Art in Planning, Univ. of Waterloo.
Zhai, Y., and P. K. Baran. 2016. “Do configurational attributes matter in context of urban parks? Park pathway configurational attributes and senior walking.” Landscape Urban Plann. 148: 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.010.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148 • Issue 2 • June 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 25, 2021
Accepted: Dec 1, 2021
Published online: Feb 2, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 2, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.