Technical Papers
Oct 26, 2021

Assessing Equitable Accessibility Based on Total Travel Cost and Multiple Options: Case Study of Airport Ground Access in Hong Kong

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

In recent decades, transit equity has become a recurrent topic within the domain of sustainable transportation, where accessibility is a crucial indicator. However, the measurement of accessibility and equity in existing studies is usually based on the route with the shortest travel time, whereas multiple travel routes and corresponding travel costs remain unexamined. Taking the ground access to Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) as an example, this study aims to fill the previous research gaps by examining the equity of accessibility by public transport simultaneously considering different sets of route options and corresponding total travel costs. These routes have either the shortest travel time or the maximum time-saving benefit–monetary cost ratio. Results reveal spatial variation in the total travel cost, which reflects considerable horizontal inequity. The results, however, indicate that vertical equity exists because the total travel cost is positively correlated with median income level across different locations. In addition, the route that provides a reasonable benefit–cost ratio further improves the equity in accessibility to HKIA. The study illustrates the significance of simultaneous consideration of total travel costs and multiple routes in the assessment of accessibility equity. It also provides transferrable methods for evaluating transit equity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Foundation for New Introduced Teachers of Shenzhen University (Grant No. 202009-2016063).

References

Budd, L., S. Ison, and T. Budd. 2016. “Improving the environmental performance of airport surface access in the UK: The role of public transport.” Res. Transp. Econ. 59: 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.013.
Budd, T., S. Ison, and T. Ryley. 2011. “Airport surface access in the UK: A management perspective.” Rese. Transp. Bus. Manage. 1 (1): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.05.003.
Carruthers, R., M. Dick, and A. Saurkar. 2005. Affordability of public transport in developing countries. Transport papers. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Church, A., M. Frost, and K. Sullivan. 2000. “Transport and social exclusion in London.” Transp. Policy 7 (3): 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00024-X.
Coogan, M. A. 2008. Ground access to major airports by public transportation. ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program) Rep. No. 4. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Currie, G., T. Richardson, P. Smyth, D. Vella-Brodrick, J. Hine, K. Lucas, J. Stanley, J. Morris, R. Kinnear, and J. Stanley. 2009. “Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne—Preliminary results.” Transp. Policy 16 (3): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.002.
Dalvi, M. Q., and K. M. Martin. 1976. “The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results.” Transportation 5 (1): 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165245.
Diao, M., Y. Zhu, and J. Zhu. 2017. “Intra-city access to inter-city transport nodes: The implications of high-speed-rail station locations for the urban development of Chinese cities.” Urban Stud. 54 (10): 2249–2267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016646686.
El-Geneidy, A., D. Levinson, E. Diab, G. Boisjoly, D. Verbich, and C. Loong. 2016. “The cost of equity: Assessing transit accessibility and social disparity using total travel cost.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 91: 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.07.003.
Geurs, K., B. Zondag, G. de Jong, and M. de Bok. 2010. “Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 15 (7): 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006.
Geurs, K. T., and B. van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions.” J. Transp. Geogr. 12: 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
Guagliardo, M. F. 2004. “Spatial accessibility of primary care: Concepts, methods and challenges.” Int. J. Health Geogr. 3 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-3-3.
Guzman, L. A., and D. Oviedo. 2018. “Accessibility, affordability and equity: Assessing ‘pro-poor’ public transport subsidies in Bogotá.” Transp. Policy 68: 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.012.
Guzman, L. A., D. Oviedo, and C. Rivera. 2017. “Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region.” J. Transp. Geogr. 58: 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016.
Hansen, W. G. 1959. “How accessibility shapes land use.” J. Am. Inst. Plann. 25 (2): 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307.
HKIA (Hong Kong International Airport). 2019. “Overview of the airport.” Accessed 31 August, 2019. https://www.hongkongairport.com/en/the-airport/hkia-at-a-glance/fact-figures.page.
Hu, L., Y. Fan, and T. Sun. 2017. “Spatial or socioeconomic inequality? Job accessibility changes for low- and high-education population in Beijing, China.” Cities 66: 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.003.
Ison, S., R. Merkert, and C. Mulley. 2014. “Policy approaches to public transport at airports—Some diverging evidence from the UK and Australia.” Transp. Policy 35: 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.06.005.
Jou, R. C., D. A. Hensher, and T. L. Hsu. 2011. “Airport ground access mode choice behavior after the introduction of a new mode: A case study of Taoyuan International Airport in Taiwan.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 47 (3): 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2010.11.008.
Kaplan, S., D. Popoks, C. G. Prato, and A. A. Ceder. 2014. “Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision.” J. Transp. Geogr. 37: 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.016.
Linovski, O., D. M. Baker, and K. Manaugh. 2018. “Equity in practice? Evaluations of equity in planning for bus rapid transit.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113: 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.030.
Litman, T. 2002. “Evaluating transportation equity.” World Transp. Policy Pract. 8 (2): 50–65.
Liu, X. 2020. “Assessing airport ground access by public transport in Chinese cities.” Urban Stud. 57 (2): 267−285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019828178.
Lucas, K. 2012. “Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?” Transp. Policy 20 (1): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013.
Lucas, K., B. van Wee, and K. Maat. 2016. “A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches.” Transportation 43 (3): 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2.
Mackett, R., K. Achuthan, and H. Titheridge. 2008. “AMELIA: A tool to make transport policies more socially inclusive.” Transp. Policy 15 (6): 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.007.
Malandri, C., L. Mantecchini, and M. N. Postorino. 2017. “Airport ground access reliability and resilience of transit networks: A case study.” Transp. Res. Procedia 27: 1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.022.
Martens, K. 2012. “Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer’s ‘spheres of justice’ to the transport sector.” Transportation 39 (6): 1035–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7.
Martens, K. 2016. Transport justice: Designing fair transportation system. New York: Routledge.
Mavoa, S., K. Witten, T. McCreanor, and D. O’Sullivan. 2012. “GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand.” J. Transp. Geogr. 20 (1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001.
Moreno, M. B., and C. Muller. 2003. “Airport choice in Sao Paulo metropolitan area: An application of the conditional logit model.” In Air Transport Research Society World Conf., 1–22. Omaha, NE: Aviation Institute, University of Nebraska.
Murakami, J., Y. Matsui, and H. Kato. 2016. “Airport rail links and economic productivity: Evidence from 82 cities with the world’s 100 busiest airports.” Transp. Policy 52: 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.009.
Neutens, T., T. Schwanen, F. Witlox, and P. De Mayer. 2010. “Equity of urban service delivery: A comparison of different accessibility measures.” Environ. Plann. A Econ. Space 42 (7): 1613–1635. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4230.
Niemeier, D. 1997. “Accessibility: An evaluation using consumer welfare.” Transportation 24 (4): 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004914803019.
Nuworsoo, C., A. Golub, and E. Deakin. 2009. “Analyzing equity impacts of transit fare changes: Case study of Alameda–Contra Costa Transit, California.” Eval. Prog. Plann. 32 (4): 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.009.
Páez, A., D. M. Scott, and C. Morency. 2012. “Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators.” J. Transp. Geogr. 25: 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016.
Palma, J. G. 2011. “Homogeneous middles vs. heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘inverted-U’: It’s All about the share of the rich.” Dev. Change 42 (1): 87–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01694.x.
Pereira, R. H. M., T. Schwanen, and D. Banister. 2017. “Distributive justice and equity in transportation.” Transp. Rev. 37 (2): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660.
Preston, J., and F. Raje. 2007. “Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion.” J. Transp. Geogr. 15 (3): 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scheurer, J., and C. Curtis. 2007. Accessibility measures: Overview and practical applications. Perth, Australia: Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin Univ.
Sen, A. 2006. “What do we want from a theory of justice?” J. Philos. 103 (5): 215–238. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517.
Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stanley, J., and D. Vella-Brodrick. 2009. “The usefulness of social exclusion to inform social policy in transport.” Transp. Policy 16 (3): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.003.
Tam, M. L., M. L. Tam, and W. H. Lam. 2005. “Analysis of airport access mode choice: A case study in Hong Kong.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 6: 708–723. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.6.708.
Tao, Z., Z. Yao, H. Kong, F. Duan, and G. Li. 2018. “Spatial accessibility to healthcare services in Shenzhen, China: Improving the multimodal two-step floating catchment area method by estimating travel time via online map APIs.” BMC Health Serv. Res. 18 (1): 345. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3132-8.
Transport Bureau. 1999. “Progress of the airport railway and transport services for the new airport.” Accessed October 9, 2021. https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr97-98/english/panels/tp/papers/a1118e01.doc.
van Wee, B., and K. Geurs. 2011. “Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations.” Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 11 (4): 350–367.
Zhao, P., and Y. Zhang. 2019. “The effects of metro fare increase on transport equity: New evidence from Beijing.” Transp. Policy 74: 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.009.
Zhou, J., M. Zhang, and P. Zhu. 2019. “The equity and spatial implications of transit fare.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 121: 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.015.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 1March 2022

History

Received: Dec 17, 2020
Accepted: Sep 14, 2021
Published online: Oct 26, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning, School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Shenzhen Univ., No. 3688, Nanhai Avenue, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-4778. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal Univ., No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing 100875, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-1666. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong SAR 999077, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-5002. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Collective and individual spatial equity measure in public transit accessibility based on generalized travel cost, Research in Transportation Economics, 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101263, 98, (101263), (2023).
  • Understanding mobility inequality through the lens of economic welfare: The difference in willingness-to-pay and actual fare matters, Cities, 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104121, 132, (104121), (2023).
  • Spatial and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Accessibility to Healthcare Services in South Korea, Healthcare, 10.3390/healthcare10102049, 10, 10, (2049), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share