Some features of the ASCE Shopping cart and login features of the website will be down for maintenance on Sunday, June 16th, 2024, beginning at 12:00 A.M. ET and ending at 6:00 A.M. ET. During this time if you need immediate assistance at 1-800-548-2723 or [email protected].

Technical Papers
Aug 6, 2021

Optimizing Location of New Public Schools in Town Planning Considering Supply and Demand

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

Schools are some of the most critical public facilities in urban and metropolitan areas. The location of schools not only affects the costs of construction and travel but also significantly affects the social welfare of the residents through its impact on education quality among other factors. The impact of school location on education quality and social welfare in general is controlled mainly by the impact of location on the balance between supply and demand, which directly affects the access of students to quality education. Therefore, selecting the location of new schools by considering the impact of location on both social and economic factors is a critical town planning decision as billions of dollars are spent every year to build new schools in major metropolitan areas across the world. However, despite the significant efforts made in previous studies, the existing school location optimization models are focused mainly on costs and efficiency as key decision objectives and little attention has been made to the impact of location on maintaining and improving the education quality by considering the balance between supply and demand. In this paper, we formulate a school facility location selection model as a multiperiod facility location problem, where the objective function attempts to optimize the location of new schools to minimize the excess demand in the school network by building schools at strategic locations, subject to budget constraints and zoning restrictions. This formulation incorporates real-life parameters, including the availability of land in different areas of a city, the fluctuation of land prices from one location to another, and the possibility of building different sizes of facilities in a certain location. The proposed model is formulated using mixed-integer linear programming and can be solved by off-the-shelf optimization solvers. An illustrative case study is presented, using a meshed grid made up of 400 zones, where the network characteristics are assumed known. The proposed model provides strategic planners with an original approach and a new perspective to model school location optimization problems. This approach contributes to the advancement of the provision in locating new schools over a planning period, by optimizing their supply-to-demand ratio, to improve social welfare.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Albareda-Sambola, M., E. Fernández, Y. Hinojosa, and J. Puerto. 2009. “The multi-period incremental service facility location problem.” Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (5): 1356–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2008.02.010.
Bao, H., Y. Fang, Q. Ye, and Y. Peng. 2018. “Investigating social welfare change in urban village transformation: A rural migrant perspective.” Social Indic. Res. 139 (2): 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1719-9.
Barbara, M., A. Akbarnezhad, and D. Rey. 2019. “Multi-period location optimization of new public facilities to maximize equity in access and capacity-saturation.” In Annual Conf.—Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 1–10. Laval, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Bertaud, A. 2015. “The spatial distribution of land prices and densities: The models developed by economists.”
Bertsimas, D., V. F. Farias, and N. Trichakis. 2011. “The price of fairness.” Oper. Res. 59 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0865.
Bruno, G., A. Genovese, C. Piccolo, and C. Sterle. 2014. “A location model for the reorganization of a school system: The Italian case study.” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 108: 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.823.
Castillo-López, I., and H. A. López-Ospina. 2015. “School location and capacity modification considering the existence of externalities in students school choice.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 80: 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.015.
Correia, I., and T. Melo. 2017. “A multi-period facility location problem with modular capacity adjustments and flexible demand fulfillment.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 110: 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.003.
Delmelle, E. M., J.-C. Thill, D. Peeters, and I. Thomas. 2014. “A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations.” J. Geog. Syst. 16 (3): 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-013-0195-2.
Fourer, R., D. M. Gay, and B. W. Kernighan. 1990. “A modeling language for mathematical programming.” Manage. Sci. 36 (5): 519–554. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.5.519.
Guo, M., Z. Jiang, Y. Bu, and J. Cheng. 2019. “Supporting sustainable development of water resources: A social welfare maximization game model.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (16): 2896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162896.
Haase, K., and S. Müller. 2013. “Management of school locations allowing for free school choice.” Omega 41 (5): 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.10.008.
IBM. 2016. CPLEX user manual, 227–228. Armonk, NY: IBM.
Ko, J., E. Nazarian, Y. Nam, and Y. Guo. 2015. “Integrated redistricting, location-allocation and service sharing with intra-district service transfer to reduce demand overload and its disparity.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54: 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.07.002.
Li, X., D. Rey, and V. V. Dixit. 2018. “An axiomatic characterization of fairness in transport networks: Application to road pricing and spatial equity.” Transp. Policy 68: 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.003.
Martínez, F. J., L. Tamblay, and A. Weintraub. 2011. “School locations and vacancies: A constrained logit equilibrium model.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 43 (8): 1853–1874. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43374.
Molnar, A., P. Smith, J. Zahorik, A. Palmer, A. Halbach, and K. Ehrle. 2007. “Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in wisconsin.” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 21 (2): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737021002165.
Müller, S., K. Haase, and S. Kless. 2009. “A multiperiod school location planning approach with free school choice.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 41 (12): 2929–2945. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40285.
Previtali, P., and E. Salvati. 2019. “Social planning and local welfare. The experience of the Italian area social plan.” Int. Plann. Stud. 24 (2): 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2018.1528864.
Savas, E. S. 1978. “On equity in providing public services.” Manage. Sci., 24 (8): 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.8.800.
Shishebori, D., M. S. Jabalameli, and A. Jabbarzadeh. 2014. “Facility location-network design problem: Reliability and investment budget constraint.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 140 (3): 04014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000187.
Slee, B., R. Hyde, J. Blair, and L. Junghans. 2015. “The NSW demountable classroom: A review of existing research and a proposed methodology for future research.” In 2014 Asia-Pacific Solar Research Conf. New South Wales, Australia: The Australian Solar Thermal Research Institute.
Sun, Q., C. Wu, Z. Li, and S. Ren. 2016. “Colocation demand response: Joint online mechanisms for individual utility and social welfare maximization.” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 34 (12): 3978–3992. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2016.2611918.
Tobih, D. O., O. A. Akintaro, and D. O. Osunlana. 2013. “Effect of class size reduction on students’ performance in mathmatics in JSSCE examination in Ibadan municipal.” Int. Educ. Res. 1 (4): 169–175.
Van Geenhuizen, M., A. Reggiani, and P. Rietveld. 2008. “Book review: Policy analysis of transport networks.” Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 1: 65–66.
Zarzosa, P., E. Noelia, and S. Arechavala. 2013. “An assessment of social welfare in Spain: Territorial analysis using a synthetic welfare indicator.” Social Indic. Res. 111 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0005-0.
Zhang, W., K. Cao, S. Liu, and B. Huang. 2016. “A multi-objective optimization approach for health-care facility location-allocation problems in highly developed cities such as Hong Kong.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 59: 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.07.001.
Zhao, Z., X. Zhu, and X. Li. 2011. “Analyzing trade-offs between efficiency and equity on public facility location.” In Proc., 61st Annual IIE Conf. and Expo Proc., 3660–3667. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Zurawsky, C., F. Jeremy, and C. Archilles 2003. “Class size: Counting students can count.” Am. Educ. Res. Assoc. 1 (2): 1–4.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 4December 2021

History

Received: Jan 21, 2021
Accepted: Jun 3, 2021
Published online: Aug 6, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mikel Barbara [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia. Email: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-3845. Email: [email protected]
Ali Akbarnezhad [email protected]
Innovation Technical Manager at Boral, Australia’s Largest Construction and Building Materials Manufacturer, and an Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Social Stratification and Spatial Equity of Educational Facilities in a Complex Urban Core in Lanzhou, China, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4390, 149, 3, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share