Technical Papers
May 26, 2021

Purchase Motivation, Landscape Preference, and Housing Prices: Quantile Hedonic Analysis in Guangzhou, China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 3

Abstract

Urban landscapes are important factors that affect housing prices, and significant differences between landscape preferences of various homebuyers may be observed because of the different reasons for purchasing a house (consumption or investment). However, the hedonic price model widely applied in most existing studies only captures the average effects of landscapes as a whole sample, and may ignore the heterogeneity of landscape preferences. To fill this gap, this study constructed hedonic price models and quantile regression models with the housing data in Guangzhou, China from 2013 to 2016 and analyzed the landscape preferences of buyers with different purchase motivations. Empirical results showed that the landscape preferences of buyers were different in housing submarkets. The implicit value of landscapes was greater in consumption demand than in investment demand, whereas investment buyers were more vulnerable to the disamenity effect of unattractive landscapes. In addition, the quantile effect of landscapes was identified, in which the buyers of high-priced housing will pay more for high-quality landscapes. This study revealed the diversified housing demands and landscape preferences of homebuyers, which is important for urban planning and project development.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous referees for their excellent comments and suggestions. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71974169), and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University’s research funding (Project No. G-SB0D).

References

Alves, A., B. Gersonius, Z. Kapelan, Z. Vojinovic, and A. Sanchez. 2019. “Assessing the co-benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for sustainable urban flood risk management.” J. Environ. Manage. 239: 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.036.
Batabyal, A. A., J. R. Kahn, and R. V. O'Neill. 2003. “On the scarcity value of ecosystem services.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 46 (2): 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00040-2.
Benson, E. D., J. L. Hansen, A. L. Schwartz, and G. T. Smersh. 1998. “Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 16 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007785315925.
Bin, O., T. W. Crawford, J. B. Kruse, and C. E. Landry. 2008. “Viewscapes and flood hazard: Coastal housing market response to amenities and risk.” Land Econ. 84 (3): 434–448. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.3.434.
Bin, O., and J. Czajkowski. 2013. “The impact of technical and non-technical measures of water quality on coastal waterfront property values in South Florida.” Mar. Resour. Econ. 28 (1): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-28.1.43.
Bolitzer, B., and N. R. Netusil. 2000. “The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon.” J. Environ. Manage. 59 (3): 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0351.
Buchinsky, M. 1998. “The dynamics of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: A quantile regression approach.” J. Appl. Econom. 13 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199801/02)13:1%3C1::AID-JAE474%3E3.0.CO;2-A.
Chen, W. Y. 2017. “Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: A hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China).” Landscape Urban Plann. 157: 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.010.
Chen, W. Y., and C. Y. Jim. 2010. “Amenities and disamenities: A hedonic analysis of the heterogeneous urban landscape in Shenzhen (China).” Geog. J. 176 (3): 227–240.
Cheng, Y., M. Liu, and M. Y. Li. 2011. “Spatial accessibility analysis of green space in suburb parks based on 2SFCA.” Cent. South For. Inventory Plann. 30 (3): 31–35.
Cho, S. H., S. G. Kim, and R. K. Roberts. 2011. “Values of environmental landscape amenities during the 2000–2006 real estate boom and subsequent 2008 recession.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 54 (1): 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.502760.
Czembrowski, P., E. Łaszkiewicz, and J. Kronenberg. 2016. “Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price: Integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces.” Urban For. Urban Greening 20: 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.07.010.
de Araujo, P., and K. Cheng. 2017. “Do preferences for amenities differ among home buyers? A hedonic price approach.” Rev. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 29 (3): 165–184.
Du, J., Y. Yang, D. Li, and J. Zuo. 2017. “Do investment and improvement demand outweigh basic consumption demand in housing market? Evidence from small cities in Jiangsu, China.” Habitat Int. 66: 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.006.
Du, X., and Z. Huang. 2018. “Spatial and temporal effects of urban wetlands on housing prices: Evidence from Hangzhou, China.” Land Use Policy 73: 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.011.
Ebru, Ç, and A. Eban. 2011. “Determinants of house prices in Istanbul: A quantile regression approach.” Qual. Quant. 45 (2): 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9296-x.
Fernandez, M. A., and S. Bucaram. 2019. “The changing face of environmental amenities: Heterogeneity across housing submarkets and time.” Land Use Policy 83: 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.024.
Gibbons, S., S. Mourato, and G. M. Resende. 2014. “The amenity value of English nature: A hedonic price approach.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 57 (2): 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9664-9.
Gunawardena, K. R., M. J. Wells, and T. Kershaw. 2017. “Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity.” Sci. Total Environ. 584-585: 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158.
Hamilton, S. E., and A. Morgan. 2010. “Integrating lidar, GIS and hedonic price modeling to measure amenity values in urban beach residential property markets.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 34 (2): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.007.
Hillsdon, M., J. Panter, C. Foster, and A. Jones. 2006. “The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity.” Public Health 120 (12): 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.007.
Hui, E. C. M., C. K. Chau, L. Pun, and M. Y. Law. 2007. “Measuring the neighboring and environmental effects on residential property value: Using spatial weighting matrix.” Build. Environ. 42 (6): 2333–2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.05.004.
Hui, E. C. M., and C. Liang. 2016. “Spatial spillover effect of urban landscape views on property price.” Appl. Geogr. 72: 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.05.006.
Hui, E. C. M., J. W. Zhong, and K. H. Yu. 2012. “The impact of landscape views and storey levels on property prices.” Landscape Urban Plann. 105 (1–2): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.002.
Jia, S., Y. Wang, and G. Z. Fan. 2018. “Home-purchase limits and housing prices: Evidence from China.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 56 (3): 386–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-017-9615-2.
Jim, C. Y., and W. Y. Chen. 2009. “Value of scenic views: Hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong.” Landscape Urban Plann. 91 (4): 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.009.
Koenker, R., and G. Bassett Jr. 1978. “Regression quantiles.” Econometrica 46 (1): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643.
Kong, F., H. Yin, and N. Nakagoshi. 2007. “Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China.” Landscape Urban Plann. 79 (3–4): 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013.
Landry, C. E., and P. Hindsley. 2011. “Valuing beach quality with hedonic property models.” Land Econ. 87 (1): 92–108. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.87.1.92.
Larson, E. K., and C. Perrings. 2013. “The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: The case of the Phoenix metropolitan area.” Landscape Urban Plann. 109 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.008.
Latinopoulos, D. 2018. “Using a spatial hedonic analysis to evaluate the effect of sea view on hotel prices.” Tourism Manage. 65: 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.019.
Lee, G., and I. Hong. 2013. “Measuring spatial accessibility in the context of spatial disparity between demand and supply of urban park service.” Landscape Urban Plann. 119: 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.001.
Levkovich, O., J. Rouwendal, and R. Van Marwijk. 2016. “The effects of highway development on housing prices.” Transportation 43 (2): 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9580-7.
Li, Z., H. Wei, Y. Wu, S. Su, W. Wang, and C. Qu. 2019. “Impact of community deprivation on urban park access over time: Understanding the relative role of contributors for urban planning.” Habitat Int. 92: 102031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102031.
Loomis, J., and M. Feldman. 2003. “Estimating the benefits of maintaining adequate lake levels to homeowners: Using the hedonic property method.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (9): 1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001799.
Lu, B., M. Charlton, P. Harris, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2014. “Geographically weighted regression with a non-Euclidean distance metric: A case study using hedonic house price data.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 28 (4): 660–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.865739.
Luo, W., and F. Wang. 2003. “Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 30 (6): 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1068/b29120.
Lutzenhiser, M., and N. R. Netusil. 2001. “The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price.” Contemp. Econ. Policy 19 (3): 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/19.3.291.
Mahan, B. L., S. Polasky, and R. M. Adams. 2000. “Valuing urban wetlands: A property price approach.” Land Econ. 76 (1): 100–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147260.
Mak, S., L. Choy, and W. Ho. 2010. “Quantile regression estimates of Hong Kong real estate prices.” Urban Stud. 47 (11): 2461–2472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009359032.
Malpezzi, S. 2002. “Hedonic pricing models: a selective and applied review.” In Housing economics and public policy, edited by T. O’Sullivan and K. Gibb, 67–89. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690680.ch5.
McMillen, D. P. 2012. Quantile regression for spatial data. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Melichar, J., and K. Kaprová. 2013. “Revealing preferences of Prague's homebuyers toward greenery amenities: The empirical evidence of distance-size effect.” Landscape Urban Plann. 109 (1): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.003.
Mittal, J., and S. Byahut. 2016. “Value capitalization effects of golf courses, waterfronts, parks, open spaces, and green landscapes — A cross-disciplinary review.” J. Sustainable Real Estate 8 (1): 62–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2016.12091887.
Mueller, J. M., and J. B. Loomis. 2014. “Does the estimated impact of wildfires vary with the housing price distribution? A quantile regression approach.” Land Use Policy 41: 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.05.008.
Poudyal, N. C., D. G. Hodges, and C. D. Merrett. 2009. “A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks.” Land Use Policy 26 (4): 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.11.008.
Rajapaksa, D., C. Wilson, V. N. Hoang, B. Lee, and S. Managi. 2017. “Who responds more to environmental amenities and dis-amenities?” Land Use Policy 62: 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.029.
Sander, H. A., and S. Polasky. 2009. “The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA.” Land Use Policy 26 (3): 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.009.
Schaeffer, Y., and J. C. Dissart. 2018. “Natural and environmental amenities: A review of definitions, measures and issues.” Ecol. Econ. 146: 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.001.
Schläpfer, F., F. Waltert, L. Segura, and F. Kienast. 2015. “Valuation of landscape amenities: A hedonic pricing analysis of housing rents in urban, suburban and periurban Switzerland.” Landscape Urban Plann. 141: 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.04.007.
Schnare, A. B., and R. J. Struyk. 1976. “Segmentation in urban housing markets.” J. Urban Econ. 3 (2): 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(76)90050-4.
Shi, Y. S., and R. Zhang. 2010. “Temporal-spatial impact effects of large-scale parks on residential prices: Exemplified by the Huangxing Park in Shanghai.” Geog. Res. 3: 14.
Soguel, N., M. J. Martin, and A. Tangerini. 2008. “The impact of housing market segmentation between tourists and residents on the hedonic price for landscape quality.” Swiss J. Econ. Stat. 144 (4): 655–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399270.
Stigarll, A., and E. Elam. 2009. “Impact of improved landscape quality and tree cover on the price of single-family homes.” J. Environ. Hortic. 27 (1): 24–30. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-27.1.24.
Svendsen, E., M. E. Northridge, and S. S. Metcalf. 2012. “Integrating grey and green infrastructure to improve the health and well-being of urban populations.” Cities Environ. 5 (1): 3.
Tapsuwan, S., G. Ingram, M. Burton, and D. Brennan. 2009. “Capitalized amenity value of urban wetlands: A hedonic property price approach to urban wetlands in Perth, Western Australia.” Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 53 (4): 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00464.x.
Votsis, A. 2017. “Planning for green infrastructure: The spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki's apartment prices.” Ecol. Econ. 132: 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.029.
Wen, H., X. Bu, and Z. Qin. 2014. “Spatial effect of lake landscape on housing price: A case study of the West Lake in Hangzhou, China.” Habitat Int. 44: 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.001.
Wen, H., Z. Gui, C. Tian, Y. Xiao, and L. Fang. 2018. “Subway opening, traffic accessibility, and housing prices: A quantile hedonic analysis in Hangzhou, China.” Sustainability 10 (7): 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072254.
Wen, H., Y. Xiao, and E. C. M. Hui. 2019. “Quantile effect of educational facilities on housing price: Do homebuyers of higher-priced housing pay more for educational resources?” Cities 90: 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.019.
Wen, H., Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2015. “Assessing amenity effects of urban landscapes on housing price in Hangzhou, China.” Urban For. Urban Greening 14 (4): 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.013.
Wu, C., X. Ye, Q. Du, and P. Luo. 2017. “Spatial effects of accessibility to parks on housing prices in Shenzhen, China.” Habitat Int. 63: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.010.
Xiao, Y., D. Wang, and J. Fang. 2019. “Exploring the disparities in park access through mobile phone data: Evidence from Shanghai, China.” Landscape Urban Plann. 181: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.013.
Xu, M., J. Xin, S. Su, M. Weng, and Z. Cai. 2017. “Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics.” J. Transp. Geog. 62: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.05.010.
Yu, K., Z. Lu, and J. Stander. 2003. “Quantile regression: Applications and current research areas.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. D 52 (3): 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00363.
Zhang, Y. Y., and R. Lee. 2014. “New-type urbanization and the development of housing market.” China Real Estate 8: 3–12.
Zheng, S. Q., and H. Y. Liu. 2005. “Income elasticity of housing demand in China: Model, estimation and forecast.” China Civ. Eng. J. 7: 122–126.
Zietz, J., E. N. Zietz, and G. S. Sirmans. 2008. “Determinants of house prices: A quantile regression approach.” J. Real Estate Fin. Econ. 37 (4): 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9053-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Dec 9, 2020
Accepted: Mar 31, 2021
Published online: May 26, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China; Center for Real Estate Studying, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-3683. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China; Center for Real Estate Studying, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-4890. Email: [email protected]
Eddie C. M. Hui [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Management, Guangzhou Univ., Guangzhou 510006, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Management, Guangzhou Univ., Guangzhou 510006, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • What accounts for the migrant–native housing price distribution gap? Unconditional quantile decomposition analysis in Guangzhou, China, Habitat International, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102666, 128, (102666), (2022).
  • Externality impacts of “Not in My Backyard” facilities on property values: Evidence from the Hangzhou waste sorting and reduction complex projects, Habitat International, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102583, 125, (102583), (2022).
  • Value capitalization effects of green buildings: A new insight through time trends and differences in various price levels, Building and Environment, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109577, 224, (109577), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share