Technical Papers
May 13, 2021

Pedestrian Satisfaction-Based Methodology for Prioritization of Critical Sidewalk and Crosswalk Attributes Influencing Walkability

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 3

Abstract

Rapid urbanization combined with limited attention to walk-facilities has resulted in a substantial increase in overall pedestrian injuries and deaths in India. Developing policies based on user perception to improve existing pedestrian infrastructure is key to promoting safe and walkable pedestrian movement in urban areas. This paper demonstrates a pedestrian satisfaction-based methodology to prioritize an essential set of attributes influencing safety and walkability at sidewalks and crosswalks. Initially, an exhaustive set of 15 sidewalk- and 11 crosswalk-related attributes influencing safety and walkability were identified from a literature review. Subsequently, pedestrian perceptions of associated importance and satisfaction toward the identified attributes were collected using a five-point Likert scale. Face-to-face interviews were conducted at selected pedestrian crash-prone locations in Hyderabad, India. The data was analyzed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a widely used multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) method to rank the attributes based on user priority. Importance–satisfaction analysis (ISA) was then used to group the attributes in a set of quadrants based on associated standardized satisfaction and importance, respectively. The relative strength and weakness of different sidewalk and crosswalk attributes were measured and compared simultaneously using TOPSIS and ISA. Both TOPSIS and ISA were simultaneously used to estimate and compare various sidewalk and crosswalk attribute relative strengths and weaknesses. Results indicated that physical separation from traffic, sidewalk amenities, sidewalk width, sidewalk continuity, and sidewalk cleanliness were the most important sidewalk attributes, but were rated as less than satisfactory, requiring immediate intervention. The crosswalk-specific priority attributes requiring urgent attention were vehicle stop-line behavior, conflicts with turning traffic, zebra crossing, pedestrian holding space. These research findings are expected to be critical inputs for rational decision-making regarding pedestrian infrastructure improvement in developing countries in general and Indian cities in particular.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding received from “Awareness in Action” and DST SERB start-up research grant funding “Sanction Order: SRG/2019/000725” for carrying out the research work.

References

ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2011. Walkability and pedestrian facilities in Asian cities state and issues. Mandaluyong, Philippines: ADB.
Aghaabbasi, M., M. Moeinaddini, M. Z. Shah, and Z. Asadi-Shekari. 2017. “A new assessment model to evaluate the microscale sidewalk design factors at the neighbourhood level.” J. Transp. Health 5: 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.012.
Ariffin, R. N. R., and R. K. Zahari. 2013. “Perceptions of the urban walking environments.” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 105: 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.062.
Austroads. 2018. Australian pedestrian facility selection tool [v2.0] user guide. ap-r472a-18. Sydney, NSW: Austroads Publication.
Cambra, P. J. M. 2012. “Pedestrian accessibility and attractiveness indicators for walkability assessment.” M.Sc. thesis, Lisbon Dep. Civ. Eng. Archit. Inst. Super. Técnico, Univ. Técnica Lisboa Technico Lisboa.
Cunningham, J. B., and E. McCrum-Gardner. 2007. “Power, effect and sample size using GPower: Practical issues for researchers and members of research ethics committees.” Evidence Based Midwifery 5 (4): 132–137.
Deng, J., and C. D. Pierskalla. 2018. “Linking importance–performance analysis, satisfaction, and loyalty: A study of Savannah, GA.” Sustainability 10 (3): 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030704.
DOT. 2016. Sacramento pedestrian master plan. Sacramento, CA: DOT.
Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A.-G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses.” Behav. Res. Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2002. Pedestrian facilities users guide: Providing safety and mobility. McLean, VA: FHWA.
Forsyth, A., J. M. Oakes, and K. H. Schmitz. 2009. “Test-retest reliability of the twin cities walking survey.” J. Phys. Act. Health 6 (1): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.6.1.119.
Galanis, A., and N. Eliou. 2012. “Development and implementation of an audit tool for the pedestrian built environment.” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 48: 3143–3152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1280.
Ghani, N. A., T. Shimizu, and S. Mokhtar. 2015. “Assessment of pedestrian facilities in Malacca world heritage site, Malaysia using p-index method.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 11: 1535–1554. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.11.1535.
Ho, C. H., H. C. Wen, C. M. Chu, and J. L. Wang. 2014. “Importance-satisfaction analysis for primary care physicians’ perspective on EHRs in Taiwan.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11 (6): 6037–6051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110606037.
Huff, H., and R. S. Liggett. 2014. The highway capacity manual’s method for calculating bicycle and pedestrian levels of service: The ultimate white paper. Los Angeles: Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies.
Hung, C. C., and L. H. Chen. 2009. “A fuzzy TOPSIS decision-making model with entropy weight under intuitionistic fuzzy environment.” In Vol. 1 of Int. Multiconf. of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 13–16. Hong Kong: IMECS.
Hyderabad Traffic Police. 2019. Hyderabad crash database. Hyderabad, India: Hyderabad Police Dept.
Kabade, B., K. Nagaraja, S. Ramanathan, A. Veeraragavan, and P. Reashma. 2018. “Improvement to pedestrian walkway facilities to enhance pedestrian safety-initiatives in India.” Int. J. Transp. Veh. Eng. 12 (3): 289–295.
Kadali, B. R., N. Rathi, and V. Perumal. 2014. “Evaluation of pedestrian mid-block road crossing behaviour using an artificial neural network (ANN).” In CICTP 2014: Safe, Smart, and Sustainable Multimodal Transportation Systems, 14th COTA Int. Conf. Transportation Professionals, 1911–1922. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kang, L., Y. Xiong, and F. L. Mannering. 2013. “Statistical analysis of pedestrian perceptions of sidewalk level of service in the presence of bicycles.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 53: 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.05.002.
Kelly, C. E., M. R. Tight, F. Hodgson, and M. Page. 2011. “A comparison of three methods for assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment.” J. Transp. Geogr. 19 (6): 1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.001.
Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, R. M. Ottenberg, D. S. McLeod, and M. Guttenplan. 2001. “Modeling the roadside walking environment: Pedestrian level of service.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1773 (1): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.3141/1773-10.
Laxman, K. K., R. Rastogi, and S. Chandra. 2010. “Pedestrian flow characteristics in mixed traffic conditions.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 136 (1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(23).
Lee, B. J., T. Y. Jang, W. Wang, and M. Namgung. 2009. “Design criteria for an urban sidewalk landscape considering emotional perception.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 135 (4): 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000013.
Lipovac, K., M. Vujanic, B. Maric, and M. Nesic. 2013. “Pedestrian behavior at signalized pedestrian crossings.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (2): 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000491.
Majumdar, B. B., D. Dissanayake, A. S. Rajput, Y. Q. Saw, and P. K. Sahu. 2020a. “Prioritizing metro service quality attributes to enhance commuter experience: TOPSIS ranking and importance satisfaction analysis methods.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (6): 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120917972.
Majumdar, B. B., S. Mitra, and P. Pareekh. 2020b. “On identification and prioritization of motivators and deterrents of bicycling.” Transp. Lett. 12 (9): 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2019.1671042.
MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways). 2017. Road accidents in India. New Delhi, India: MoRTH.
MoSPI (Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation). 2018. Motor-vehicles- statistical year book India-number of motor vehicles registered in India (taxed and tax-exempted). New Delhi, India: MoSPI.
Movahed, S., S. P. Azad, and H. Zakeri. 2012. “A safe pedestrian walkway; creation a safe public space based on pedestrian safety.” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 35: 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.124.
Mukherjee, D., and S. Mitra. 2019. “Impact of road infrastructure land use and traffic operational characteristics on pedestrian fatality risk: A case study of Kolkata, India.” Transp. Dev. Econ. 5 (2): 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-019-0077-5.
Olsen, S. O. 2007. “Re-purchase loyalty: The role of involvement and satisfaction.” Psychol. Mark. 24 (4): 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20163.
Paladugula, A. L., et al. 2018. “A multi-model assessment of energy and emissions for India’s transportation sector through 2050.” Energy Policy 116: 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.037.
Phanikumar, C. V. 2011. “Modelling generalized cost of travel and its’ applications.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, IIT Kharagpur.
Rahaman, K. R., J. M. Lourenço, and J. M. Viegas. 2012. “Perceptions of pedestrians and shopkeepers in European medium-sized cities: Study of Guimarães, Portugal.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (1): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000094.
Roy, S., and D. Basu. 2019. “Ranking urban catchment areas according to service condition of walk environment.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 145 (4): 04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000225.
Sadhukhan, S., U. K. Banerjee, and B. Maitra. 2015. “Commuters’ perception towards transfer facility attributes in and around metro stations: Experience in Kolkata.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (4): 04014038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000243.
Seneviratne, P. N. 1985. “Acceptable walking distances in central areas.” J. Transp. Eng. 111 (4): 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:4(365).
Singh, S. K. 2012. “Urban transport in India: Issues, challenges, and the way forward.” Eur. Transp./Trasporti Europei (52). http://hdl.handle.net/10077/8185.
Southworth, M. 2005. “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (4): 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).
Taylor, R. 1990. “Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review.” J. Diagn. Med. Sonogr. 6 (1): 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106.
Times of India. 2019. “62 pedestrians die daily in India, up 84% in 4 years”. Accessed October 5, 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com.
Tiwari, G., S. Bangdiwala, A. Saraswat, and S. Gaurav. 2007. “Survival analysis: Pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersections.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 10 (2): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.06.002.
Tonge, J., and S. A. Moore. 2007. “Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study.” Tourism Manage. 28 (3): 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.007.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2015. “Goal 11 targets.” Accessed October 5, 2020. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-11-sustainable-cities-and-communities/targets.html.
Van Cauwenberg, J., V. Van Holle, D. Simons, R. Deridder, P. Clarys, L. Goubert, J. Nasar, J. Salmon, I. De Bourdeaudhuij, and B. Deforche. 2012. “Environmental factors influencing older adults’ walking for transportation: A study using walk-along interviews.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9 (1): 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-85.
Wang, W.-C., C.-L. Lin, S.-H. Wang, J.-J. Liu, and M.-T. Lee. 2014. “Application of importance-satisfaction analysis and influence-relations map to evaluate design delay factors.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 20 (4): 497–510. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.801922.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2013. Pedestrian safety, A road safety manual for decision makers and practitioners. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2016. Road safety in the South-East Asia region 2015. Geneva: WHO.
Woldeamanuel, M., and A. Kent. 2016. “Measuring walk access to transit in terms of sidewalk availability, quality, and connectivity.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (2): 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000296.
WPP (World Population Prospects). 2019. “World Population Prospects.” Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. Accessed November 12, 2019. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf.
Yang, C. C. 2003. “Improvement actions based on the customers’ satisfaction survey.” Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excellence 14 (8): 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336032000090842.
Yoon, K. P., and C.-L. Hwang. 1995. Vol. 104 of Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. New York: SAGE Publications.
Zainol, R., F. Ahmad, N. A. Nordin, and A. W. M. Aripin. 2014. “Evaluation of users’ satisfaction on pedestrian facilities using pair-wise comparison approach.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 18: 012175. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012175.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Nov 26, 2019
Accepted: Feb 23, 2021
Published online: May 13, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad 500078, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7721-8436. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad 500078, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-5631. Email: [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad 500078, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-0037. Email: [email protected]
Nikitha Vendotti [email protected]
Former Master’s Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, BITS Pilani, Hyderabad 500078, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15075684, 15, 7, (5684), (2023).
  • A Comparative Evaluation of the Total Cost of Ownership between Electric Two-Wheelers and Motorized Two-Wheelers from an Indian Perspective, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981221077087, 2676, 5, (526-550), (2022).
  • Clustering pedestrians’ perceptions towards road infrastructure and traffic characteristics, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 10.1080/17457300.2022.2112234, 30, 1, (68-78), (2022).
  • Walkability and importance assessment of pedestrian facilities on central business district in capital city of Indonesia, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100695, 16, (100695), (2022).
  • Assessing commuters’ perceptions towards improvement of intermediate public transport as access modes to metro stations, Transport Policy, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.011, 129, (140-155), (2022).
  • Contribution of streetscape features to the hedonic pricing model using Geographically Weighted Regression: Evidence from Amsterdam, Tourism Management, 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104523, 91, (104523), (2022).
  • Influence of heavy vehicle operation on walkability from pedestrians’ perspective in Krishnanagar Municipality, India, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.11.010, 10, 4, (2530-2545), (2022).
  • A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph18168813, 18, 16, (8813), (2021).
  • Evaluating Pedestrian Crash-Prone Locations to Formulate Policy Interventions for Improved Safety and Walkability at Sidewalks and Crosswalks, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981211004127, 2675, 9, (675-689), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share