Case Studies
Mar 11, 2021

Analysis of the Pedestrian System Indicators of City Blocks Based on the Real Walking Network: A Case Study of Jinan, China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

Over the last few decades, cities have been committed to building efficient, coordinated, and energy-saving transportation modes. As the most flexible and green travel mode, walking provides effective connections for various modes of transportation; therefore, it has received extensive attention from planners. A pedestrian network is a basic guarantee of walking, and its construction method has become a focus of many walking studies. However, due to the characteristics of flexibility and wide coverage, a pedestrian network often cannot be completely constructed, which causes problems with missing data in planning and research. This imperfect data has caused pedestrian network problems not to be effectively solved during the process of urban transformation. Taking Jinan's old city, Jinan, Shandong Province, China as an example, this study will use a variety of data to construct the real walking network (RWN) of Jinan's old city, which combines all the available roads in parks, squares, and residential quarters into the street network (SN). Compared with the SN, the RWN better reflects the real travel conditions of pedestrians. This study compares the common walking indicators of the SN and the RWN, which includes network connectivity and the service level of bus stops. The results show that there are significant differences between the RWN and the SN. The RWN that has more complete data is not significantly better than the SN, but the differences between the two will have an impact on the results of walking research. Therefore, RWN should be used in walking research. In addition, based on the comparison of the results, this study makes reasonable suggestions to improve the pedestrian system in Jinan's old city.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Baidu. n.d. “Spring scenic area.” Baidu Maps. Accessed May 20, 2020. https://map.baidu.com/@13028540.93,4368193.68,16z.
Bassett, D. J., J. Pucher, R. Buehler, D. L. Thompson, and S. E. Crouter. 2008. “Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia.” J. Phys. Act. Health 5 (6): 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.6.795.
Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. 1979. “Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility.” In Behavioural travel modelling, edited by D. A. Hensher, and P. R. Sopher, 654–679. Andover, UK: Croom Helm.
Bhat, C., S. Handy, K. Kockelman, H. Mahmassani, and P. Organization. 2002. Development of an urban accessibility index: Formulations, aggregation, and application. Research Rep. No. 4938-4. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Cervero, R., O. L. Sarmiento, E. Jacoby, L. F. Gomez, and A. Neiman. 2009. “Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogota.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 3 (4): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310802178314.
Chin, G. K. W., K. P. Van Niel, B. Giles-Corti, and M. Knuiman. 2008. “Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data.” Preventive Med. 46 (1): 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.004.
Ellis, G., R. Hunter, M. A. Tully, M. Donnelly, L. Kelleher, and F. Kee. 2016. “Connectivity and physical activity: Using footpath networks to measure the walkability of built environments.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 43 (1): 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515610672.
Ewing, R. 1996. Best development practices: Doing the right thing and making money at the same time. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
Fan, P. L., L. H. Xu, W. Z. Yue, and J. Q. Chen. 2017. “Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai.” Landscape Urban Plann. 165: 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.007.
Frank, L. D., M. A. Andresen, and T. L. Schmid. 2004. “Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 27 (2): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011.
Frank, L. D., T. L. Schmid, J. F. Sallis, J. Chapman, and B. E. Saelens. 2005. “Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 28 (2): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001.
Gallagher, P., W. E. Marshall, and C. Atkinson-Palombo. 2013. “Missing links: How social paths can improve pedestrian accessibility to light rail.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2393 (1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.3141/2393-07.
Gehl, J. 1971. Life between buildings. London: Island Press.
Geurs, K. T., and B. van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions.” J. Transp. Geogr. 12 (2): 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
Google. n.d. “Spring scenic area.” Google Maps. Accessed May 20, 2020. https://www.google.com/maps/@36.6694414,117.0310002,15.27z.
Handy, S. L., M. G. Boarnet, R. Ewing, and R. E. Killingsworth. 2002. “How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 23 (2): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0.
Handy, S. L., and K. J. Clifton. 2001. “Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities.” J. Transp. Stat. 4 (2/3): 67–78.
Handy, S. L., and D. A. Niemeier. 1997. “Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 29 (7): 1175–1194. https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175.
Hansen, W. 1959. “How accessibility shapes land use.” J. Am. Inst. Planners 25 (2): 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307.
Hillier, B. 1996. Space is the machine. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Ingram, D. R. 1971. “The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form.” Reg. Stud. 5 (2): 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237100185131.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. Washington, MI: Random House.
Leng, H., Y. Lu, and Q. Yuan. 2017. “Study on the walking accessibility on urban public open space of the cold region in winter time.” Archit. J. S1: 38–42.
Levine, J. 1998. “Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 64 (2): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975972.
Lunecke, M. G. H., and R. Mora. 2018. “The layered city: Pedestrian networks in downtown Santiago and their impact on urban vitality.” J. Urban Des. 23 (3): 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1369869.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2013. Guidelines for the standardized planning of urban walking and bicycle system. Beijing: MOHURD.
Porta, S., and J. L. Renne. 2005. “Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia.” Urban Des. Int. 10 (1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000136.
Randall, T. A., and B. W. Baetz. 2001. “Evaluating pedestrian connectivity for suburban sustainability.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 127 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:1(1).
Reyes, M., A. Paez, and C. Morency. 2014. “Walking accessibility to urban parks by children: A case study of Montreal.” Landscape Urban Plann. 125: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.002.
Shen, Q. 1998. “Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 25 (3): 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1068/b250345.
Tal, G., and S. Handy. 2012. “Measuring nonmotorized accessibility and connectivity in a robust pedestrian network.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2299 (1): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2299-06.
Upchurch, C., M. Kuby, M. Zoldak, and A. Barranda. 2004. “Using GIS to generate mutually exclusive service areas linking travel on and off a network.” J. Transp. Geogr. 12 (1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.001.
Wachs, M., and T. G. Kumagai. 1973. “Physical accessibility as a social indicator.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 7 (5): 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4.
Wang, F. H. 2000. “Modeling commuting patterns in Chicago, in a GIS environment: A job accessibility perspective.” Prof. Geogr. 52 (1): 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00210.
Whyte, W. H. 1980. The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
Zhang, H., and Y. Y. Zhang. 2019. “Pedestrian network analysis using a network consisting of formal pedestrian facilities: Sidewalks and crosswalks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (7): 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119846095.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Jun 7, 2020
Accepted: Dec 16, 2020
Published online: Mar 11, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shengnan Niu [email protected]
School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong 250061, China. Email: [email protected]
School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong 250061, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share