Estimating Dynamic Distribution Condition of Pedestrian Concentration on an Urban Scale
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 4
Abstract
The distribution of pedestrians in urban space reflects the status of urban spatial planning to some extent. The reasonable prediction of pedestrian concentration is of great significance to the evaluation of urban vitality, urban comfort, and urban spatial layout planning. In this paper, a method for predicting pedestrian concentration is proposed, which can estimate pedestrian concentration in a whole city without being limited to a specific intersection or city node. According to the characteristics of three kinds of transportation accessibility based on space syntax and commercial vitality index, a dynamic distribution estimation model of pedestrian concentration is proposed. Taking Xi’an city of China as a case study, through multiple linear regression (MLR), a support vector regression (SVR) algorithm, and random forest (RF) algorithm, the pedestrian concentration in five periods of a day was predicted and analyzed, and the spatial and temporal characteristics of crowd distribution are comprehensively described. The results show that the dynamic distribution model of pedestrian concentration constructed by RF is superior to the MLR and SVR, and its average prediction accuracy can reach 93.86%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial support provided by the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges provided by Chang’an University (Grant Nos. 300102328402 and 300102320201) is acknowledged. This research was supported by Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2016JM5052) and by Xi’an Science and Technology Bureau Project Funding (2019218514GXRC021CG022-GXYD21.3).
References
Aoun, A., J. Bjornstad, B. Dubose, M. Mitman, and M. Pelon. 2015. White paper series bicycle and pedestrian forecasting tools : State of the practice, 1–27. Chapel Hill, NC: Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Changxiu, C., Z. Wenchang, C. Jie, and C. Jun. 2007. “Evaluating the accessibility about Beijing’s subways in 2008 based on spatial syntax.” Geo-Inf. Sci. 9 (6): 31–35.
Chengyuan, Z., Z. Jin, and Z. Haiyao. 2017. “Spatial analysis and influence mechanism of urban vitality based on multi-Big data: A case study of downtown hangzhou.” Archit. Cult. 9. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/jzywh201709067.
Clifton, K. J., P. A. Singleton, C. D. Muhs, and R. J. Schneider. 2016. “Representing pedestrian activity in travel demand models: Framework and application.” J. Trans. Geogr. 52: 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.03.009.
Cortes, C., and V. Vapnik. 1995. “Support-Vector networks.” Mach. Learn. 20 (3): 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022627411411.
De, W., W. Can, X. Dongcan, Z. Yiqing, W. Min, Z. Wei, and L. Yuan. 2015. “Comparison of commercial circles of different grades of commercial centers in shanghai based on mobile signaling data: A case study of Nanjing East Road, Wujiaochang and Anshan Road.” Urban Plann. Forum Since 223 (3): 54–64.
Dhanani, A., L. Tarkhanyan, and L. Vaughan. 2017. “Estimating pedestrian demand for active transport evaluation and planning.” Transp. Res. Part A 103: 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.020.
Hamed, M. M. 2001. “Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings.” Saf. Sci. 38 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00058-8.
Hillier, B., and S. Iida. 2005. “Network and psychological effects in urban movement.” In Spatial information theory, edited by A. G. Cohn, and D. M. Mark. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Jiang, B. 2009. “Ranking spaces for predicting human movement in an urban environment.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 23 (7): 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802022822.
Lerman, Y., Y. Rofè, and I. Omer. 2014. “Using space syntax to model pedestrian movement in urban transportation planning.” Geogr. Anal. 46 (4): 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12063.
Omer, I., and N. Kaplan. 2017. “Using space syntax and agent-based approaches for modeling pedestrian volume at the urban scale.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 64: 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.007.
Purvis, C. L. 2003. Incorporating the effects of smart growth and transit oriented development in San Francisco bay area travel demand models : Current and future strategies, 1–24. San Francisco: Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Raford, N., and D. Ragland. 2004. “Space syntax: Innovative pedestrian volume modeling tool for pedestrian safety.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1878 (1): 66–74. https://doi.org/10.3141/1878-09.
Schneider, R. J., T. Henry, M. F. Mitman, L. Stonehill, and J. Koehler. 2012. “Development and application of volume model for pedestrian intersections in San Francisco, California.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2299 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3141/2299-08.
Volchenkov, D., and P. Blanchard. 2008. “Scaling and universality in city space syntax: Between Zipf and Matthew.” Physica A 387 (10): 2353–2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.11.049.
Zhiqiang, W., and Y. Zhongnan. 2016. “Urban spatial structure research based on baidu map thermal Map: Taking Shanghai central city as an example.” City Plann. Rev. 40 (4): 33–40.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 19, 2020
Accepted: Jul 2, 2020
Published online: Sep 21, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 21, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.