Technical Papers
Apr 13, 2020

Nested Logit Joint Model of Travel Mode and Travel Time Choice for Urban Commuting Trips in Xi'an, China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 2

Abstract

Commuter trips are an important part of urban travel, and studying the influencing factors, changing rules, and choice behaviors of urban commuting trips is of great significance for optimizing the urban trip structure. This paper utilizes a nested logit model to investigate commuters' joint choice behavior of commuting time and mode by considering factors including socioeconomic, household, and trip characteristics. Two possible decision-making model structures are proposed: the commuting time-mode structure (time choice is the upper level) and the commuting mode-time structure (mode choice is the upper level). A model specification is conducted in SPSS based on the data of Xi'an urban commuters, and the commuting time-mode structure is demonstrated as the appropriate one by judging the inclusive value of each nest. It indicates that commuters often choose a commuting mode based on commuting time, and the commuting time-mode model is more suitable for fitting commuters' travel choice. The higher the household income, the greater the probability of commuting by taxi or driving alone. Commuting distance strongly and negatively influences mode choice, including walking, bicycling, bus, and taxi. Civil servants, medical staff, teachers, and technical staff are more sensitive to commuting time than are other commuters. Commuters who usually go to work by driving alone may turn to a bus when a car is not available. Increasing total household bicycle ownership will bring competition between bicycle and bus and enhance commuters' willingness to bike to work, especially when the cycling time is above 30 min.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of facts and data. In addition, the work is partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Project No. 2018YFB1601300) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51878062). The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of any organization, nor do they constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

References

Bhat, C. R. 1997. “Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops.” Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 31 (1): 41–54.
Bhat, C. R. 1998. “Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multi-dimensional choice modeling: Formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice.” Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 32 (7): 455–466.
Bhat, C. R. 2000. “Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work travel mode choice modeling.” Transport. Sci. 34: 228–238.
Bill, J. 2011. Learn excel 2007 through excel 2010 from MrExcel: Master pivot tables, subtotals, charts, VLOOKUP, IF, data analysis. Uniontown, OH: Holy Macro! Books.
Brands, T., E. De Romph, T. Veitch, and J. Cook. 2014. “Modelling public transport route choice, with multiple access and egress modes.” Transport. Res. Proc. 1 (1): 12–23.
Campbell, A. A., C. R. Cherry, and M. S. Ryerson. 2016. “Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing.” Transport. Res. C: Emerging Technol. 67: 399–414.
Cascetta, E. 1996. “A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: Specification and some calibration results for inter-urban networks.” In Proc., 13th Int. Symp. on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Lyon, France: Pergamon.
Debrezion, G., E. Pels, and P. Rietveld. 2009. “Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice.” Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 45 (1): 270–283.
de Jong, G., A. Daly, M. Pieters, C. Vellay, M. Bradley, and F. Hofman. 2003. “A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit.” Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 39 (3): 245–268.
Ding, C., S. Mishra, Y. Lin, and B. Xie. 2014. “Cross-nested joint model of travel mode and departure time choice for urban commuting trips: Case study in Maryland–Washington, DC, region.” J. Urban Plan. Dev. 141 (4): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000238.
Frank, L., M. Bradley, S. Kavage, J. Chapman, and T. K. Lawton. 2008. “Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice.” Transportation 35 (1): 37–54.
Guan, H. Z. 2004. Disaggregate model: A tool of traffic behavior analysis, 50–60. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Heinen, E., K. Maat, and B. Van Wee. 2013. “The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands.” Transportation 40 (1): 23–43.
Hess, D. B. 2001. “Effect of free parking on commuter mode choice: Evidence from travel diary data.” Transport. Res. Rec. 1753 (1): 35–42.
Hess, S., A. Daly, C. Rohr, and G. Hyman. 2007. “On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modelling forecasting systems.” Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 41 (9): 802–826.
Hess, S., and J. W. Polak. 2005. “Mixed logit modelling of airport choice in multi-airport regions.” J. Air. Transport. Manage. 11: 59–68.
Hess, S., and J. W. Polak. 2006. “Exploring the potential for cross-nesting structures in airport-choice analysis: A case-study of the Greater London area.” Transport. Res. E: Logist. Transport. Rev. 42 (2): 63–81.
Johansson, M. V., T. Heldt, and P. Johansson. 2006. “The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice.” Transport. Res. A: Policy Pract. 40 (6): 507–525.
Lai, X., and M. Bierlaire. 2015. “Specification of the cross-nested logit model with sampling of alternatives for route choice models.” Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 80: 220–234.
Limtanakool, N., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen. 2006. “The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips.” J. Transp. Geogr. 14 (5): 327–341.
Luan, K., Z. Juan, and F. Zong. 2010. “Research on commuter’s choice behavior between travel mode and trip chain.” J. Highw. Transport. Res. Dev. 27 (6): 111–115.
Ma, S., K. M. Kockelman, and D. J. Fagnant. 2015. “Welfare analysis using logsum differences versus rule of half: Series of case studies.” Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2530 (1): 73–83.
Mao, H.-X., and H.-X. Lu. 2004. “Research on person trip characteristics and transportation improving suggestions of Quanzhou City.” J. Beijing Univ. Technol. 30 (4): 457–461.
McFadden, D. 1974. “The measurement of urban travel demand.” J. Publics Econ. 3 (4): 303–328.
McFadden, D. 1981. “Econometric models of probabilistic choice.” In Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, edited by C. Manski and D. McFadden, 198–272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mekky, A. 2001. Analytical transportation planning. Thornhill, Ontario, Canada: Alican Consultants.
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2016. “The Outline of the 13th Five-Year Plan for Urban Public Transportation.” Transport Services Division. Accessed January 28, 2019. http://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/jigou/ysfws/201607/t20160725_2978674.html.
Mohanty, S., and S. Blanchard. 2016. “Complete transit: Evaluating walking and biking to transit using a mixed logit mode choice model.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting.
Mouon, A. V., C. Lee, A. D. Cheadle, C. W. Collier, D. Johnson, T. L. Schmid, and R. D. Weather. 2005. “Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective.” Transport. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 10 (3): 245–261.
Pinjari, A. R., R. M. Pendyala, C. R. Bhat, P. A. Waddell. 2007. “Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impact of the built environment on commute mode choice.” Transportation 34 (5): 557–573.
Razo, M., and S. Gao. 2013. “A rank-dependent expected utility model for strategic route choice with stated preference data.” Transport. Res. C: Emerging Technol. 27: 117–130.
Rybarczyk, G., and L. Gallagher. 2014. “Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university.” J. Transp. Geogr. 39: 1–10.
Srikukenthiran, S., A. Shalaby, and E. Morrow. 2014. “Mixed logit model of vertical transport choice in Toronto subway stations and application within pedestrian simulation.” Transport. Res. Proc. 2: 624–629.
State Council and Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2012. “Guiding Opinions of the State Council on Urban Priority Development of Public Transportation.” The State Council, 64. Accessed January 28, 2019. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/05/content_2304962.htm.
State Council and Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2013. “Notice of the State Council on Printing and Disclosing the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan.” The State Council, 37. Accessed January 28, 2019. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm.
Statistic Bureau of Xi’an. 2011. “The Six National Census Data Bulletin of Xi’an in 2010.” Z. Statistic Bureau of Xi’an. Accessed January 24, 2019. http://tjj.xa.gov.cn/ptl/def/def/index_923_6225_ci_trid_995656.html.
Statistic Bureau of Xi’an. 2012. “Xi’an Social and Economic Development Statistics in 2011.” Z. Statistic Bureau of Xi’an. Accessed January 24, 2019. http://tjj.xa.gov.cn/ptl/def/def/index_923_6225_ci_trid_1747119.html.
Uncles, M. D. 1987. “Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 38 (4): 370–371.
Vovsha, P., and S. Bekhor. 1998. “Link-nested logit model of route choice: Overcoming route overlapping problem.” Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 1645 (1): 133–142.
Williams, H. C. W. L. 1977. “On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit.” Environ. Plann. A 9 (3): 285–344.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Oct 26, 2018
Accepted: Oct 22, 2019
Published online: Apr 13, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 14, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shuhong Ma, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Highway, Chang’an Univ., Middle Rd. of 2nd South Ring, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, School of Highway, Chang’an Univ., Middle Rd. of 2nd South Ring, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China. Email: [email protected]
Chuanqi Liu [email protected]
MSc Student, School of Highway, Chang’an Univ., Middle Rd. of 2nd South Ring, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share