Case Studies
Apr 3, 2020

Planning for Better Skywalk Systems Using Perception of Pedestrians: Case Study of Mumbai, India

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 2

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to identify the critical factors influencing the use of pedestrian skywalk facilities in an Indian context. An interviewer-administered questionnaire survey was conducted to understand the perceptions of pedestrians using the skywalks under existing conditions. The forward stepwise binary logistic regression method was used to identify the potential factors influencing pedestrian preference for using the skywalks in the current scenario. The study revealed that the majority of users were male students and servicemen, age category 13–45 years, who used the skywalk for educational trips or work. Model results revealed that available width, obstructions, safety and security, walk environment, and age are the factors which mostly influence the perception of the skywalk usability. Respondent responses about future usability showed that installation and maintenance of elevators/escalators/ramps, improvement of security, regular maintenance, and removal of obstructions, could influence pedestrian prioritization of such facilities in the future. The outcomes of the study can help planners, engineers, and designers to evaluate the current status of skywalk facilities as well as provide indicators for a coherent solution to encourage greater use of such elevated facilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR)–Central Road Research Institute (CRRI), New Delhi, under the Supra Institutional Network Project (SINP) category as part of the 12th Five-Year Plan Period (FYP).

References

Abojaradeh, M. 2013. “Evaluation of pedestrian bridges and pedestrian safety in Jordan.” Civ. Environ. Res. 3 (1): 66–79.
Beiler, M. R. O., and B. Phillips. 2016. “Prioritizing pedestrian corridors using walkability performance metrics and decision analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (1): 04015009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000290.
Blaga, O. 2013. “Pedestrian zones as important urban strategies in redeveloping the community—Case study: Alba iulia borough park.” Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 9 (38): 5–22.
Das, A., and S. Barua. 2015. “A survey study for user attributes on foot over bridges in perspective of Dhaka City.” In Int. Conf. on Recent Innovation in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (IICSD-2015), 1–6. Gazipur, Bangladesh: DUET.
Demiroz, Y. I., P. Onelcin, and Y. Alver. 2015. “Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 80: 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.018.
Frank, L. D., B. E. Saelens, K. E. Powell, and J. E. Chapman. 2007. “Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?” Soc. Sci. Med. 65 (9): 1898–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.053.
Guo, H., F. Zhao, W. Wang, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhang, and G. Wets. 2014. “Modeling the perceptions and preferences of pedestrians on crossing facilities.” Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2014: 949475. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/949475.
Hasan, R., and M. Napiah. 2014. “The effect of structure and street characteristics on the footbridge usage.” J. Appl. Sci. Agric. 9 (21): 52–59.
Hasan, R., and M. Napiah. 2018. “The perception of Malaysian pedestrians toward the use of footbridges.” Traffic Inj. Prev. 19 (3): 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1373768.
Herms, F. 1972. “Pedestrian crosswalk study: Accidents in painted and unpainted crosswalks.” Transp. Res. Board 406: 1–13.
Irvine, C. H., S. H. Snook, and J. H. Sparshatt. 1990. “Stairway risers and treads: Acceptable and preferred dimensions.” Appl. Ergon. 21 (3): 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(90)90005-I.
Koepsell, T., L. McCloskey, M. Wolf, A. V. Moudon, D. Buchner, J. Kraus, and M. Patterson. 2002. “Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian–motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians.” JAMA 288 (17): 2136–2143.
Lee, B. J., T. Y. Jang, W. Wang, and M. Namgung. 2009. “Design criteria for an urban sidewalk landscape considering emotional perception.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 135 (4): 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000013
Lotfi, S., and M. J. Koohsari. 2011. “Neighborhood walkability in a city within a developing country.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (4): 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000085.
MMRDA (Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority). 2008. Comprehensive Transportation Study for Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Mumbai, India: MMRDA.
Mohan, D. 2009. Road accidents in India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Roads Transport & Highways Transport Research Wing.
Mohan, D., G. Tiwari, and K. Bhalla. 2016. Road safety in India: Status report. New Delhi, India: Transportation Research & Injury Prevention Programme, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.
Morrall, F. J., L. L. Ratnayake, and N. P. Seneviratne. 1991. “Comparison of central business district pedestrian characteristics in Canada and Sri Lanka.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1294: 57–61.
Mutto, M., O. C. Kobusingye, and R. R. Lett. 2002. “The effect of an overpass on pedestrian injuries on a major highway in Kampala–Uganda.” Afr. Health Sci. 2 (3): 89–93.
NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau). 2015. Accidental deaths and suicides in India. Technical Rep. New Delhi, India: NCRB.
Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., and B. Scott-Parker. 2017. “Footbridge usage in high-traffic flow highways: The intersection of safety and security in pedestrian decision-making.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 49: 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.010.
Owen, N., N. Humpel, E. Leslie, A. Bauman, and J. F. Sallis. 2004. “Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda.” Am. J. Prev. Med. 27 (1): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006.
Pasha, M. M., S. M. Rifaat, A. Hasnat, and I. Rahman. 2015. “Pedestrian’s behaviour on road crossing facilities.” J. Teknol. 73 (4): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4292.
Rahaman, K. R., J. M. Lourenço, and J. M. Viegas. 2012. “Perceptions of pedestrians and shopkeepers in European medium-sized cities: Study of guimarães, Portugal.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (1): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000094.
Rankavat, S., and G. Tiwari. 2016. “Pedestrians perceptions for utilization of pedestrian facilities–Delhi, India.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 42: 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.02.005.
Räsänen, M., T. Lajunen, F. Alticafarbay, and C. Aydin. 2007. “Pedestrian self-reports of factors influencing the use of pedestrian bridges.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 39 (5): 969–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.01.004.
Rastogi, R. 2010. “Willingness to shift to walking or bicycling to access suburban rail: Case study of Mumbai, India.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 136 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(3).
Rizati, H., S. Z. Ishak, and I. R. Endut. 2013. “The utilization rates of pedestrian bridges in Malaysia.” In 2013 IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC), 646–650. Piscataway NJ: IEEE.
Robertson, K. A. 1987. “Pedestrian skywalks—The esthetic impact on downtown.” Landscape Urban Plann. 3: 43–47.
Robertson, K. A. 1993. “Pedestrianization strategies for downtown planners: Skywalks versus pedestrian malls.” J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 59 (3): 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975887.
Saha, M. K., T. R. Tishi, M. S. Islam, and S. K. Mitra. 2013. “Pedestrian behavioral pattern and preferences in different road crossing systems of Dhaka city.” J. Bangladesh Inst. Plan. 6: 149–160.
Sangphong, O., and S. Siridhara. 2014. “A study of footbridge utilization behavior in Nakhon Ratchasima.” Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 3: 93–100.
Sinclair, M., and M. Zuidgeest. 2016. “Investigations into pedestrian crossing choices on Cape Town freeways.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 42: 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.006.
Southworth, M. 2005. “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (4): 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).
Wang, W., P. Li, W. Wang, and M. Namgung. 2012. “Exploring determinants of pedestrians’ satisfaction with sidewalk environments: Case study in Korea.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (2): 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000105.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2018. Global status report on road safety. Geneva: WHO.
Woldeamanuel, M., and A. Kent. 2016. “Measuring walk access to transit in terms of sidewalk availability, quality, and connectivity.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (2): 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000296.
Wu, Y., J. Lu, H. Chen, and L. Wu. 2014. “Identification of contributing factors to pedestrian overpass selection.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 1 (6): 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30291-9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Jan 5, 2019
Accepted: Aug 28, 2019
Published online: Apr 3, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 3, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781039 Assam, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-295X. Email: [email protected]
Akhilesh Kumar Maurya [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781039 Assam, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share