New Urban Forms, Diversity, and Computational Design: Exploring the Open Block
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 2
Abstract
Architects, urban designers, and city planners witness a contemporary lack of imagination regarding new urban form typologies. Most proposals have swung between two well-defined extremes: the dense, traditional block and the strips/towers defined by the modernist principles. More recent yet distinctive proposals are rare, even as the challenges of urban environments have changed. Based on the concept of diversity, one notably acclaimed exception is Christian de Portzamparc's open block (îlot ouvert), proposed as a set of flexible, interdependent rules that ensures an attractive, varied urban scene, and applied in Masséna, a new neighborhood in Paris. However, this new typology has raised some issues, such as the necessary design efforts or the developer's uncertainties as to buildable surface associated with flexibility of form. Computational design tools (CDT) provide an opportunity to explore and quantify the performance and limits of new urban form typologies. Using CDT, this study first confirmed that the rules stated by Portzamparc were sufficient and consistent to achieve the intended urban forms, and that these forms are translatable into common design code parameters. Second, this study discussed the open block as a new form type, by framing its degree of diversity. Finally, this study checked the utility of CDT during the decision-support process and concluded its potentially wider convenience to explore renewed morphological creativity in urban designers beyond rigid design codes and standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank four anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and insightful suggestions. We also show our gratitude to French architect Benjamin Jeanson, who was the first to tell us about the open block and Masséna. We are also immensely grateful to Louis Caudron, researcher at the Université de Montréal, who generously shared his ideas, work, and data; and Ramón López de Lucio, Emeritus Professor at ETSAM-UPM, for his expert opinion and comments. Last but not least, we thank Fiona Westbury, Fellow of the Institute of Linguists, for proofreading the text. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Agkathidis, A. 2015. Generative design. London: Laurence King.
Amado, M., and F. Poggi. 2014. “Solar urban planning: A parametric approach.” Energy Procedia 48: 1539–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.174.
Banister, D. 2008. “The sustainable mobility paradigm.” Transp. Policy 15 (2): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
Beirão, J. N., P. Nourian, and B. Mashhoodi. 2011. “Parametric urban design: An interactive sketching system for shaping neighborhoods.” In Proc., 29th Conf. on eCAADe. Respecting Fragile Places, 225–234. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Faculty of Architecture, University of Ljubljana. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.10.4.521.
Ben-Joseph, E. 2004. “Future of standards and rules in shaping place: Beyond the urban genetic code.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 130 (2): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:2(67).
Berghauser Pont, M., and P. Haupt. 2005. “The spacemate: Density and the typomorphology of the urban fabric.” Nordic J. Archit. Res. 4 (4): 55–68.
Berghauser Pont, M. Y., and P. A. Haupt. 2007. “The relation between urban form and density.” Urban Morphol., 11 (1): 62–65.
Bielik, M., S. Schneider, and R. Koenig. 2012. “Parametric urban patterns: Exploring and integrating graph-based spatial properties in parametric urban modelling.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 30th eCAADe Conf., Digital Physicality, 701–708. Prague, Czechia: Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical University in Prague. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2045.6163.
Carpio-Pinedo, J. 2014. “La manzana abierta de Portzamparc como tipología para el paisaje urbano contemporáneo.” Planur-e, 3.
Caudron, L. 2011. L’ouverture de l’îlot. Paris: École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture Paris Val-de-Seine.
Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2 (3): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
Charalampidis, E., and I. Tsalikidis. 2015. “A parametric landscape design approach for urban green infrastructure development.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Changing Cities II: Spatial, Design, Landscape & Socio-Economic Dimensions, 591–600. Porto Heli, Greece: University of Thessaly.
Charmes, E. 2007. La rue, village ou décor? Parcours dans deux rues de Belleville. Grane, France: Créaphis.
Cohen, J. L., and C. Hubert. 2014. France: Modern architectures in history. London, United Kingdom: Reaktion Books (Modern Architectures in History).
Cullen, G. 1961. Townscape. New York: Reinhold.
Curtis, W. J. R. 1982. Modern architecture since 1900. Re-publish. 3rd ed. London: Phaidon.
Fernández Per, A., J. Mozas, and J. Arpa. 2009. Hoco: Density housing construction & costs. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: a+t architecture publishers (a+t magazine: Hybrids series).
Firley, E., and K. Groen. 2014. The urban masterplanning handbook. New York: Wiley.
Foltête, J. C., and A. Piombini. 2007. “Urban layout, landscape features and pedestrian usage.” Landscape Urban Plann. 81 (3): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.12.001.
Gerber, D. 2007. “Pour un urbanisme paramétrique. Towards a parametric urbanism.” In Anomalie_digital art no6—Interactive cities, edited by V. Châtelet, 146–171. Paris: Anomos & Hyx Editions.
Hanson, J. 1989. “Order and structure in urban design: The plans for the rebuilding of London after the Great Fire of 1666.” Ekistics 56 (334–335): 22–42.
Hertzberger, H. 1991. Lessons for students in architecture. Re-edited. Rotterdam, Netherlands: 010 Publishers.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Koenig, R., Y. Miao, K. Knecht, and C. Mei-Chih. 2017. “Interactive urban synthesis. Computational methods for fast prototyping of urban design proposals.” In Proc., CAADFutures: Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures, edited by G. Çağdaş, M. Özkar, L. Gül, and E. Gürer, 23–41. Istanbul, Turkey: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5197-5.
Koltsova, A., G. Schmitt, P. Schumacher, T. Sudo, S. Narang, and L. Chen. 2011. “A case study of script-based techniques in urban planning.” In Design computing and cognition ‘10, edited by J. S. Gero, 681–700. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_36.
Landry, C. 2000. “Urban vitality: A new source of urban competitiveness.” Archis 12: 8–13.
Le Corbusier. 1957. La Charte d'Athènes. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Litman, T. 2013. “The new transportation planning paradigm.” ITE J. 83: 20–28.
Luo, Y., J. He, and Y. Ni. 2017. “Analysis of urban ventilation potential using rule-based modeling.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 66: 13–22.
Masboungi, A. 2009. Organiser la ville hypermoderne: François Ascher, Grand Prix de l’urbanisme 2009. Marseille, France: Parenthèses (Grand Prix de l’urbanisme).
Mega, V. P. 2010. Sustainable cities for the third millennium: The odyssey of urban excellence. New York: Springer.
Mohareb, E., S. Derrible, and F. Peiravian. 2016. “Intersections of sustainability and Jane Jacobs, conditions for diversity: A look at four global cities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (2): 05015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000287.
Montgomery, J. 1998. “Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design.” J. Urban Des. 3 (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.
Nes, A. v., M. Berghauser Pont, and B. Mashhoodi. 2012. “Combination of space syntax with spacematrix and the mixed use index. The Rotterdam South test case.” In Proc., 8th Int. Space Syntax Symp. 1–29. Santiago, Chile: PUC.
Nisztuk, M., and P. B. Myszkowski. 2017. “Usability of contemporary tools for the computational design of architectural objects: Review, features evaluation and reflection.” Int. J. Archit. Comput. 16 (1): 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077117738919.
Panerai, P., J. Castex, J. C. Depaule, and I. Samuels. 2004. Urban forms: The death and life of the urban block. London: Architectural Press.
Pozueta Echavarri, J., F. J. Lamíquiz Dauden, and M. Porto Schettino. 2013. Architecture & pedestrians. Architectural guidelines for a walkable city. Madrid, Spain: CEDEX-Ministerio de Fomento.
Reale, L. 2008. Densità, città, residenza: Tecniche di densificazione e strategie anti-sprawl. Rome, Italy: Gangemi Editore (Architettura, Urbanistica, Ambiente Arte, Disegno, Rilievo, Design).
Reale, L., ed. 2012. La città compatta: Sperimentazioni contemporanee sull’isolato urbano europeo. Rome, Italy: Gangemi Editore.
Roudsari, M. S., and M. Pak. 2013. “Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design.” In Proc., 13th Conf. of Int. Building Performance Simulation Association, 3129–3135. Chambéry, France: IBPSA. http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs2013/p_2499.pdf.
Shapiro, V. 2002. “Solid modeling.” In Handbook of computer aided geometric design, edited by G. Farin, J. Hoschek, and M. Kim, 473–518. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451104-1/50021-6.
Shi, L., S. Yang, and L. Gao. 2016. “Effects of a compact city on urban resources and environment.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (4): 05016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000324.
Siddi, C., and G. B. Cocco. 2016. Itinerari di architettura e paesaggio: Barcellona, Lyon, Paris. Rome: Gangemi Editore (Architettura, Urbanistica, Ambiente Archeologia, Restauro).
Société d'Economie Mixte d'Aménagement de Paris. 2010. Christian de portzamparc—L’Îlot Ouvert / The open block. Brussels, Belgium: SEMAPA—Ante Prima—AAM Éditions.
Song, Y., L. Merlin, and D. Rodriguez. 2013. “Comparing measures of urban land use mix.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 42: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.08.001.
Southworth, M. 2005. “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (4): 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).
Speranza, P. 2016. “Using parametric methods to understand place in urban design courses.” J. Urban Des. 21 (5): 661–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1092378.
Steinø, N., B. Karima, and E. Obeling. 2013a. “Using parametrics to facilitate collaborative urban design: An attempt to overcome some inherent dilemmas.” Planum 26: 1–13.
Steinø, N., M. B. Yıldırım, and M. Özkar. 2013b. “Parametric design strategies for collaborative and participatory urban design.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 31st eCAADe Conf., of Computation and Performance, 195–204. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
WORKac. 2009. 49 cities. New York: Storefront for Art and Architecture.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146 • Issue 2 • June 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 25, 2018
Accepted: Aug 9, 2019
Published online: Mar 19, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 19, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.