Case Studies
Oct 15, 2019

Exploratory Analysis of Revealed Pedestrian Paths as Cues for Designing Pedestrian Infrastructure

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 145, Issue 4

Abstract

Pedestrianism is a key mode of transportation within an urban community. However, unlike motorized transport, pedestrians are not limited to using the codified infrastructure designed for foot travel (e.g., sidewalks). Pedestrians can reveal, in physical form, desired paths to connect origins and destinations. This exploratory study employed two methods to examine the extent and drivers of desired pedestrian paths and activity: (1) aerial photography and spatial analysis were used to create an inventory of desired paths on the campus of Florida State University, and (2) a survey of desired path users was administered to determine the drivers of this activity. A comparison of spatial data from 2013 and 2018 demonstrates an array of desired paths on campus and, over time, campus planners have codified many of these informal paths. The results from the survey demonstrate that pedestrians use desired paths primarily for efficiency but not at the expense of nighttime safety concerns. We offer desired paths as physical evidence of pedestrian preferences that planners can use to improve the design of pedestrian infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bennett, T. H., and R. Wright. 1984. Burglars on burglary. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing Company.
Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2 (3): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
Chu, X., M. Guttenplan, and M. R. Baltes. 2004. “Why people cross where they do: The role of street environment.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1878 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/1878-01.
De Dios Ortuzar, J., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling transport. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
DOT. 1994. National bicycle and walking study. Case no. 1: Reasons why bicycling and walking are and are not being used more extensively as travel modes. Washington DC: DOT.
Evans, S. P. 1973. “A relationship between the gravity model for trip distribution and the transportation problem in linear programming.” Transp. Res. 7 (1): 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(73)90005-1.
Florida State University. 2018. “About FSU.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://www.fsu.edu/about/.
Governors Highway Safety Association. 2017. “Pedestrian traffic fatalities by state.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2018-02/pedestrians18.pdf.
Ishaque, M. M., and R. B. Noland. 2008. “Behavioural issues in pedestrian speed choice and street crossing behaviour: A review.” Transp. Rev. 28 (1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701365239.
Kohlstedt, K. 2016. “Least resistance: How desire paths can lead to better design.” Accessed September 20, 2019. https://99percentinvisible.org/article/least-resistance-desire-paths-can-lead-better-design/.
Koslow, J. 2006. “Tour of historic and future campus planning and development of Florida State University.” Accessed February 28, 2019. http://myweb.fsu.edu/jkoslow/studentprojects/pubhisfall06website/development.pdf.
Lamit, H., M. Majid, A. Shafaghat, and A. Keyvanfar. 2012. “Sidewalk design decision making model based on walking behavior pattern recognition: Proposal validation.” OIDA Int. J. Sustainable Dev. 4 (1): 27–34.
Lieberwirth, R. 2017. “Gender makes a world of difference for safety on public transport.” Accessed March 1, 2019. http://theconversation.com/gender-makes-a-world-of-difference-for-safety-on-public-transport-80313.
National Association of Realtors. 2017. “Community and transportation preferences survey.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://trec.pdx.edu/sites/default/files/NAR-PSU_2015_C%26T_Preferences_Survey_Report-1.pdf.
Newman, O. 1972. Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.
Obeng-Atuah, D., M. Poku-Boansi, and P. B. Cobbinah. 2017. “Pedestrian crossing in urban Ghana: Safety implications.” J. Transp. Health 5 (Jun): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.06.007.
Owings, J. 2017. “Follow your customers’ desire paths and pave the way to better UX.” Accessed February 28, 2019. https://blog.fullstory.com/what-are-desire-paths-and-how-use-desire-paths-for-design-and-development/.
Papadimitriou, E., S. Lassarre, and G. Yannis. 2016. “Introducing human factors in pedestrian crossing behaviour models.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 36 (Jan): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.003.
Rouphail, N. M. 1984. Midblock crosswalks: A user compliance and preference study. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Schmitt, A. 2018. “America’s pedestrian safety crisis isn’t getting any better.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://usa.streetsblog.org/2018/03/05/americas-pedestrian-safety-crisis-isnt-getting-any-better/.
Sisiopiku, V. P., and D. Akin. 2003. “Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 6 (4): 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2003.06.001.
The United States Conference of Mayors. 2015. “Menino survey of mayors.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://www.bu.edu/ioc/files/2016/01/Menino-Survey-of-Mayors-2015-Final-Report.pdf.
Tom, A., and M.-A. Granié. 2011. “Gender differences in pedestrian rule compliance and visual search at signalized and unsignalized crossroads.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (5): 1794–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.012.
Vanky, A., S. K. Verma, T. K. Courtney, P. Santi, and C. Ratti. 2017. “Effect of weather on pedestrian trip count and duration: City-scale evaluation using mobile phone application data.” Prev. Med. Rep. 8 (1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.07.002.
Vojnovic, I. 2016. “Building communities to promote physical activity: A multi-scale geographical analysis.” Geografiska Annaler: Ser. B, Hum. Geogr. 88 (1): 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00206.x.
Yang, Y., and A. Diez-Roux. 2012. “Walking distance by trip purpose and population subgroups.” Am. J. Preventative Med. 43 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015.
Zheng, Y., T. Chase, L. Elefteriadou, B. Schroeder, and V. P. Sisiopiku. 2015. “Modeling vehicle–pedestrian interactions outside of crosswalks.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 59 (Dec): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2015.08.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 145Issue 4December 2019

History

Received: Dec 11, 2018
Accepted: May 1, 2019
Published online: Oct 15, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 15, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306-2280. (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-5891. Email: [email protected]
Ryan Wenger [email protected]
Planner, Kimley Horn Consultants, Policy Planning Office, 2700 Welaunee Blvd., Apt. 515, Tallahassee, FL, 32308. Email: [email protected]
Michael Duncan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306-2280. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share