Technical Papers
Nov 26, 2019

Decision Support Framework for Space-Use Efficiency and Arrangement of Public Services

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146, Issue 1

Abstract

This article focuses on the issue of a sustainable space-use in public facilities and beneficial arrangement of services. Uncorrelated facility planning and service programming as well as environmental factors cause discrepancies between space demand and space supply leading to space overuse or underuse. To enhance the functional and economic efficiency of public facilities, a conceptual framework, which is a planning and evaluation tool for decision support, is presented and discussed in examples. The framework consists of two decisive elements: space-use analysis and service compatibility analysis. The first one aims to determine the degree of space utilization in multiple public buildings while the latter reports on how services are related to each other in terms of their compatibility. The article explains these concepts in detail in examples.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded through the project CROWDSAVING (Ref. TIN2016-79726-C2-2-R) cofounded by the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and the European Funds for Regional Development (FEDER). It also has the support of the Catalan Government through the consolidated research groups (Ref. 2017-SGR-1551, SITES group) programme of the Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya.

References

Athanasiou, F., and Y. Photis. 2004. “Combinatorial locational analysis of public services in metropolitan areas. Case study in the city of Volos, Greece.” In Proc., 44th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: Regions and Fiscal Federalism. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: European Regional Science Association.
Batty, M., E. Besussi, K. Maat, and J. Harts. 2004. “Representing multifunctional cities: Density and diversity in space and time.” Built Environ. 30 (4): 324–337. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.324.57156.
Bestplaces. 2019. “Best places to Live | Compare cost of living, crime, cities, schools and more. Sperling’s Best Places.” Accessed March 2, 2019. http://www.bestplaces.net.
Citybenchmarkingdata. 2017. “City benchmarking data: Any data any city.” Accessed March 2, 2019. https://citybenchmarkingdata.com.
Drira, A., H. Pierreval, and S. Hajri-Gabouj. 2007. “Facility layout problems: A survey.” Ann. Rev. Control. 31 (2): 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.04.001.
Endsley, M. R., and D. J. Garland. 2000. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gheisari, M., and J. Irizarry. 2011. “Investigating facility managers’ decision making process through a situation awareness approach.” Int. J. Facility Manage. 2 (1): 1–11.
Gupta, J., and S. Gupta. 1988. “Single facility scheduling with nonlinear processing times.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 14 (4): 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(88)90041-1.
Ibrahim, I., W. Yusoff, and K. Bilal. 2012. “Space management: A study on space usage level in higher education institutions.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 47: 1880–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.917.
Kim, T., S. Cha, and Y. Kim. 2016. “Space choice, rejection and satisfaction in university campus.” Indoor Built Environ. 27 (2): 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16665897.
Kim, T. W., and M. Fischer. 2014. “Automated generation of user activity–space pairs in space-use analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (5): 04014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000839.
Kourtit, K., P. Nijkamp, and M. Partridge. 2013. “The new urban world: Opportunity meets challenge.” Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 5 (2): 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12000.
Kusiak, A., and S. Heragu. 1987. “The facility layout problem.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 29 (3): 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90238-4.
Kwok, A., and C. Warren. 2005. “Optimization of performance in facilities management.” In Proc., Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conf. Melbourne, Australia: Pacific Rim Real Estate Society.
Lee, J., and H. Lee. 2014. “Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services.” Supplement, Government Inf. Q. 31 (S1): S93–S105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.010.
Liggett, R. 2000. “Automated facilities layout: Past, present and future.” Autom. Constr. 9 (2): 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00005-9.
Marsal-Llacuna, M. L. 2010. La cosa publica i l’urbanisme, o, Per que tenim els equipaments que tenim. Lleida, Spain: Pages Editors.
Marsal-Llacuna, M. L., Y. T. Leung, and G. J. Ren. 2011. “Smarter urban planning: Match land use with citizen needs and financial constraints.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Computational Science and Its Applications, 93–108. Berlin: Springer.
Meller, R., V. Narayanan, and P. Vance. 1998. “Optimal facility layout design.” Oper. Res. Lett. 23 (3–5): 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00024-8.
Panigrahi, N. 2014. Computing in geographic information systems. Helsinki, Finland: CRC Press.
Pennanen, A. 2004. User activity based workspace definition as an instrument for workplace management in multi-user organizations. Helsinki, Finland: Haahtela-kehitys Oy.
Pinedo, M. 2015. Scheduling: Theory, algorithms and systems. New York: Springer.
Pym, D., R. Taylor, and C. Tofts. 2007. “Public services innovation through technology.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Management of Engineering and Technology, 2736–2739. New York: IEEE.
ReVelle, C. 1987. “Urban public facility location.” In Vol. 2 of Handbook of regional and urban economics, 1053–1096. Amsterdam, Holland: North Holland.
Rotmans, J., M. van Asselt, and P. Vellinga. 2000. “An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 20 (3): 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00039-1.
Rusek, R., M. Marsal-Llacuna, F. Torrent Fontbona, and J. Colomer Llinas. 2016. “Compatibility of municipal services based on service similarity.” Cities. 59 (Nov): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.024.
Saraswat, A., U. Venkatadri, and I. Castillo. 2015. “A framework for multi-objective facility layout design.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 90 (Dec): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.09.006.
Services Facilities. 2009. Space planning guidelines. Pocatello, ID: Idaho State Univ.
Shmoys, D. B., C. Swamy, and R. Levi. 2004. “Facility location with service installation costs.” In Proc., 15th Annual ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 1088–1097. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Suzuki, T., and M. J. Hodgson. 2003. “Multi-service facility location models.” Ann. Oper. Res. 123 (1–4): 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026183515320.
Teitz, M. 1968. “Toward a theory of urban public facility location.” Pap. Reg. Sci. 21 (1): 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952720.
Thabet, W., and Y. Beliveau. 1994. “Modeling work space to schedule repetitive floors in multistory buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 120 (1): 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:1(96).
van den Dobbelsteen, A., and S. de Wilde. 2004. “Space use optimisation and sustainability: Environmental assessment of space use concepts.” J. Environ. Manage. 73 (2): 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.002.
Vienna University of Technology. 2007. “European smart cities.” Accessed March 2, 2019. http://www.smart-cities.eu/.
Wiggins, J. 2010. Facilities manager’s desk reference. Chichester, UK: Blackwell.
Zhang, X., and H. Gao. 2010. “Optimal performance-based building facility management.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 25 (4): 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00633.x.
Zhao, J., B. Lasternas, K. Lam, R. Yun, and V. Loftness. 2014. “Occupant behavior and schedule modeling for building energy simulation through office appliance power consumption data mining.” Energy Build. 82 (Oct): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.033.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 146Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Jul 9, 2018
Accepted: Apr 16, 2019
Published online: Nov 26, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Apr 26, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Robert Rusek, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Fellow, Institute of Applied Informatics, Univ. of Girona, Av. LluisSantaló S/N, Bloc P IV, Research group eXiT, 17003 Girona, Spain (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Joan Colomer Llinas, Ph.D.
Professor, Institute of Applied Informatics, Univ. of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Joaquim Melendez Frigola, Ph.D.
Professor, Institute of Applied Informatics, Univ. of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share