Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2016

Urban Transportation Vehicle Sustainability Assessment with a Comparative Study of Weighted Sum and Fuzzy Methods

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 4

Abstract

Sustainability assessment in transportation planning and selection of the best transportation mode among alternatives is a challenging process. The technological differences among conventional, hybrid, and alternative fuel vehicles and buses, the large number of variables in the sustainability assessment of transportation systems, and the subjective judgment of decision makers introduce uncertainty. The objective of this paper is thus twofold: (1) to demonstrate a sustainability framework that focuses specifically on vehicle characteristics and (2) to compare two multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods in terms of ranking sustainability performance of transportation vehicles and applicability to selected indicators. The two most widely adopted MCDM methods for decision making were used, the weighted sum method for its simplicity and the fuzzy logic method for its ability to incorporate imprecise and vague information. The assessment includes five vehicle types and various mode share scenarios. The results from the two methods were compared by using traffic composition data by vehicle technology from a 33.2-km (20.6-mi) network in urban Honolulu. Both methods provided vehicle rankings on a continuous scale and integrate vehicle technology and fuel characteristics in the assessment. The differences between the two methods appear to be systematic with the weighted sum method generating results with greater fluctuations. The fuzzy logic method is more stable. It is also more flexible because it is capable of incorporating quantitative and qualitative judgment criteria.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., and Phillis, Y. A. (2004). “Evaluating strategies for sustainable development fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis.” Ecol. Econ., 48(2), 149–172.
Anielski, M. (2011). “Alberta GPI blueprint report.” 〈http://www.pembina.org〉 (Sep. 2, 2012).
APTA (American Public Transportation Association). (2009). “Public transportation fact book.” Washington, DC.
Bevan, T. A., Donna, L., Senner, R., and Seskin, S. (2008). “Planning for sustainability: Planning for sustainable transportation infrastructure.” Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Black, W. R. (1996). “Sustainable transportation: A U.S. perspective.” J. Transp. Geogr., 4(3), 151–159.
Chester, M. V., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains.” 〈http://iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-9326/4/2/024008/〉 (Jun. 16, 2012).
CTR (Center for Transportation Research). (1998). “Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: An energy and environmental analysis, Volume 1.” Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL.
CTR (Center for Transportation Research). (2005). “Development and applications of GREET 2.7. The transportation vehicle-cycle model.” Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL.
CTR (Center for Transportation Research). (2006). “Operating manual for GREET—Version 1.7.” Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL.
Davis, S. C., Diegel, S. W., and Boundy, R. G. (2011). Transportation energy data book, 30th Ed., U.S. Dept. of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Dobranskyte-Niskota, A., Perujo, A., and Pregl, M. (2007). “Indicators to assess sustainability of transport activities.” European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy.
DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). (2015). “Greenhouse gas emissions for electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.” 〈https://www.fueleconomy.gov〉 (Dec. 25, 2015).
Edmunds. (2012). “Top 10 lists.” 〈http://www.edmunds.com〉 (Dec. 25, 2015).
EEA (European Environment Agency). (2002). “Paving the way for EU enlargement—Indicators of transport and environment integration.” Denmark, EU.
EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2012a). “Average retail price of electricity to ultimate customers by end-use sector, by state.” 〈http://www.eia.gov〉 (Jul. 4, 2012).
EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2012b). “Gasoline and diesel fuel update.” 〈http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_history.html〉 (Jul. 4, 2012).
FME (Free Management Ebooks). (2013). “PESTLE analysis, strategy skills.” 〈http://www.free-management-ebooks.com/dldebk-pdf/fme-pestle-analysis.pdf〉 (Jul. 12, 2014).
Gilbert, R., and Tanguay, H. (2000). “Sustainable transportation performance indicators project.” Center for Sustainable Transportation, ON, Canada.
Hardy, T. L. (1995). “Multi-objective decision making under uncertainty: Fuzzy logic methods.” NASA Technical Memorandum, Computing in Aerospace Meeting, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center, Cleveland.
Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L. B., and Matthews, S. H. (2006). Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services, an input-output approach, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Ishibuchi, H., Murata, T., and Gen, M. (1998). “Performance evaluation of fuzzy rule-based classification systems obtained by multi-objective genetic algorithms.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 35(3–4), 575–578.
ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). (1999). Transportation planning handbook, Washington, DC.
Jeon, C. M., Amekudzi, A., and Guensler, R. (2008). “Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performances and measures and indexes.” Transportation Research Board Annual Conf. (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Kikuchi, S., and Kronprasert, N. (2013). “Handling uncertainty in transit project evaluation and rating process: A comparison between the existing FTA approach and a fuzzy inference approach.” Transportation Research Board Annual Conf. (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Krajnc, D., and Glavic, P. (2005). “A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development resources.” Res. Conser. Recycl., 43(2), 189–208.
Maoh, H., and Kanaroglou, P. (2009). “A tool for evaluating urban sustainability via integrated transportation and land use simulation models.” Urban Environ., 3, 28–46.
Mitropoulos, L., and Prevedouros, P. (2013). “Assessment of sustainability for transportation vehicles.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2344, 88–97.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation). (1999). “Using the pressure-state-response model to develop indicators of sustainability.” Paris.
Paez, D., and Currie, G. (2008). “Improving transport planning decision making—Adapting the analytical hierarchy approach to large number of options.” Transportation Research Board Annual Conf. (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Paula, M. (2013). “Diesel boom? Ownership of diesel cars way up, but still a fraction of U.S. market.” 〈http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewdepaula/2013/04/30/ownership-of-diesel-cars-up-but-still-a-fraction-of-market〉 (Apr. 5, 2015).
Paz, A., Maheshwari, P., and Kachroo, P. (2012). “Estimation of performance indices for the planning of sustainable transportation systems.” Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Pham, D. T., and Castellani, M. (2002). “Action aggregation and defuzzification in Mamdani-type fuzzy systems.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C, 216, 747–759.
Phillis, Y. A., and Davis, B. J. (2009). “Assessment of corporate sustainability via fuzzy logic.” J. Intell. Rob. Syst., 55(1), 3–20.
Phillis, Y. A., Grigoroudis, E., and Kouikoglou, V. S. (2011). “Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries.” Ecol. Econ., 70(3), 542–553.
Pintér, L., Hardi, P., and Bartelmus, P. (2005). “Sustainable development indicators, proposal for a way forward.” UN Division on Sustainable Development, New York.
Pislaru, M., and Trandabat, A. F. (2012). “Fuzzy based environmental system approach for impact assessment—Case studies.” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 6(7), 446–451.
Pislaru, M., Trandabat, A. F., and Curteanu, S. (2012). “Fuzzy environmental assessment of urban areas sustainability.” 2nd Int. Conf. on Environment and Industrial Innovation, Vol. 35, IACSIT, Singapore.
Ren, J., Fedele, A., Mason, M., Manzardo, A., and Scipioni, A. (2013). “Fuzzy multi-actor multi-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production.” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38(22), 9111–9120.
Renne, J. L. (2009). “Evaluating transit-oriented development using a sustainability framework: Lessons from Perth’s network city. Planning sustainable communities: Diversity of approaches and implementation challenges.” Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, 115–148.
Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., and Gecchele, G. (2012). “Sustainability evaluation of transportation policies: A fuzzy based method in a “what to” analysis.” Proc., 17th Online Conf. on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, Vol. 223, Springer, Switzerland, 315–326.
Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., and Gecchele, G. (2013). “Comparison of a fuzzy-based and AHP methods in sustainability evaluation: A case of traffic pollution-reducing policies.” Eur. Transp. Res., 5(1), 11–26.
Silva, A. N. R., and Ramos, R. A. R. (2010). “Development and application of I_Sum—An index of sustainable urban mobility.” Transportation Research Board Annual Conf. (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
St. Flour, P. O., Makoondlall-Chadee, T., Bokhoree, C., and Mohee, R. (2014). “Structured fuzzy based methodological approach towards sustainability performance assessment.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev., 5(2), 223–227.
TCRP (Transit Cooperative Research Program). (2003). “Bus rapid transit. Volume 1: Case studies in bus rapid transit.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2006). “Commuting in America III, The third national report on commuting patterns and trends.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2009). “Performance measurement framework for highway capacity decision making.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Triantaphyllou, E., and Mann, S. H. (1989). “An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision making paradox.” Int. J. Decis. Support Syst., 5(3), 303–312.
TTI (Texas Transportation Institute). (2009). “Urban mobility report.” 〈http://tti.tamu.edu/〉 (Jun. 15, 2011).
U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2003). “User’s guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2. U.S.” Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2008). “Average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger cars and light trucks.” 〈http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/420f08024.pdf〉 (Dec. 25, 2015).
U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2012). “EPA and NHTSA set standards to reduce greenhouse gases and improve fuel economy for model years 2017–2025 cars and light trucks.” 〈http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f12051.pdf〉 (Dec. 25, 2015).
Waheed, B., Khan, F., and Veitch, B. (2009). “Linkage-based frameworks for sustainability assessment: Making a case for driving force-pressure-state-exposure-effect-action (DPSEEA) frameworks.” Sustainability, 1(3), 441–463.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Yoon, K. P., and Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making—An introduction, Sage, CA.
Zalengera, C., Blanchard, R. E., Eames, P. C., Juma, A. M., Chitawo, M. L., and Gondwe, K. T. (2014). “Overview of the Malawu energy situation and a PESTLE analysis for sustainable development of renewable energy.” Renewable Sustainab. Energy Rev., 38, 335–347.
Zhang, L., and Prevedouros, P. (2011). “User perceptions of signalized intersection level of service using fuzzy logic.” Transportmetrica, 7(4), 279–296.
Zheng, J., Atkinson-Palombo, C., McCahill, C., O’Hara, R., and Garrick, N. W. (2011). “Quantifying the economic domain of transportation sustainability.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Zietsman, J., Rilett, L. R., and Seung-Jun, K. (2003). “Sustainable transportation performance measures for developing communities.” 〈http://www.tti.tamu.edu/〉 (May 14, 2012).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 4December 2016

History

Received: Jun 10, 2015
Accepted: Jan 29, 2016
Published online: Apr 11, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lambros K. Mitropoulos, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Center of Research Technology Hellas, Hellenic Institute of Transport, 52 Egialias St., 15125 Marousi, Greece (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Panos D. Prevedouros, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share