Technical Papers
Mar 21, 2016

Equity in Regional Public Transit Finance: Tradeoffs between Social and Geographic Equity

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 4

Abstract

This study examines equity in public transit finance for transit service among nine cities and townships that formed a consortium for regional transit service in Toledo, Ohio, in 2006. The main data for the analysis—operating and financial data of fixed-route bus and demand-responsive services and data on local property tax receipts—were obtained from the transit agency, as well as the National Transit Database. The analysis results show that the distribution of costs and benefits of transit subsidy was progressive among sociodemographic groups while it exhibited geographic inequity, and suggest that it is inevitable to find a conflict between social equity and geographic equity in public transit finance within urban areas where transit dependents remain in inner cities while regional transit funding has to rely more on taxes provided by affluent suburban communities. The shrinking role of federal and state governments in public transit assistance exacerbated this conflicting situation by reducing funding that could be used to enhance transit service in each community.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The contents of this study reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The author wishes to thank James Gee and Jason Binder at TARTA for their tremendous support to provide the data and information on operation and finance. The author also thanks Sarah Lyon-Hill and Jeanette Eckert for their assistance with the original work of this study, as well as Angela Martinez and Karitsa Norman for the revision of this article.

References

Altsushuler, A., Womack, J. P., and Pucher, J. R. (1979). The urban transportation system: Politics and public innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Amekudzi, A., and Meyer, M. D. (2006). “Considering the environment in transportation planning: Review of emerging paradigms and practice in the United States.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 42–52.
Ameregis Corp. and Metropolitan Area Research Corp. (2003). “Toledo metropatterns: A regional agenda for community and stability in Toledo.” Minneapolis.
Bates, J. W., and Anderson, N. (1982). “Average transit trip lengths by racial and income classes in Atlanta: Equity of flat fares based on trip length.” Transp. Res. Rec., 857, 60–63.
Black, A. (1995). Urban mass transportation planning, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bollens, S. A. (2003). “In through the back door: Social equity and regional governance.” Hous. Policy Debate, 13(4), 631–657.
Cervero, R. (1981a). “Efficiency and equity impacts of current transit fare policies.” Transp. Res. Rec., 799, 7–15.
Cervero, R. (1981b). “Flat versus differentiated transit pricing: What’s a fair fare?” Transportation, 10(3), 211–232.
Ferreri, M. G. (1979). “Comparative costs of transit modes.” Chapter 12, Public transportation: Planning, operations, and management, 2nd Ed., G. E. Gray and L. A. Hoel, eds., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Fielding, G. J. (1987). Managing public strategically, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Garrett, M., and Taylor, B. D. (1999). “Reconsidering social equity in public transit.” Berkeley Plann. J., 13, 6–27.
Hess, D. B., and Lombardi, P. A. (2005). “Governmental subsidies for public transit: History, current issues, and recent evidence.” Publics Works Manage. Policy, 10(2), 138–156.
Hodge, D. C. (1988). “Fiscal equity in urban mass transit systems: A geographic analysis.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geographers, 78(2), 288–306.
Iseki, H., and Taylor, B. D. (2002). “The demographics of public transit subsidies: A case study of Los Angeles.” 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Jones, D. W., Jr. (1985). Urban transit policy: An economic and political history, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Katz, B., and Bradley, J. (1999). “Divided we sprawl.” The Atlantic, December, 26–42.
Leutze, C. B., and Ugolik, W. R. (1978). Who pays the highest and lowest per-mile transit fare?, New York State Dept. of Transportation, Albany, NY.
Li, J., and Wachs, M. (2004). “The effects of federal transit subsidy policy on investment decisions: The case of San Francisco's Geary Corridor.” Transportation, 31(1), 43–67.
Mayer, G., and Marcantonio, R. A. (2006). “Bay Area transit: Separate and unequal.” 〈http://www.thestreetspirit.org/Feb2006/transit.htm〉 (Jun. 30, 2008).
McLennan, P. (2006). “Bus rider and transit union alliance fights racism in Atlanta.” 〈http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/59961:bus-rider-and-transit-union-alliance-fights-racism-in-atlanta〉 (Aug. 4, 2015).
Nash, C. (1988). “Integration of public transport: An economic assessment.” Bus deregulation and privatisation: An international perspective, J. S. Dodgson and N. Topham, eds., Gowan, Aldershot, U.K.
Pickrell, D. (1986). “Federal operating assistance for urban mass transit: Assessing a decade of experience.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1078, 1–10.
Pucher, J. R., Evans, T., and Wenger, J. (1998). “Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 1995 NPTS.” Transp. Q., 52(3), 15–33.
Pucher, J. R., Hendrickson, C., and McNeil, S. (1981). “Socioeconomic characteristics of transit riders: Some recent evidence.” Traffic Q., 35(3), 461–483.
Pucher, J. R., Markstedt, A., and Hirschman, I. (1983). “Impacts of subsidies on the costs of urban public transport.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 17(2), 155–176.
Pucher, J. R., and Williams, F. (1992). “Socioeconomic characteristics of urban travelers: Evidence from the 1990-91 NPTS.” Transp. Q., 46(4), 561–581.
Puentes, R., and Prince, R. (2005). “Fueling transportation finance: A primer on the gas tax.” Taking the high road: A metropolitan agenda for transportation reform, B. Katz and R. Puentes, eds., Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 45–76.
Reja, B. (1999). “Essays in the political economy of contracting: An institutional analysis of private sector participation in urban public transport.” Ph.D. dissertation, Economics, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA.
Sciara, G.-C., and Wachs, M. (2007). “Metropolitan transportation funding: Prospects, progress and practical considerations.” Publics Works Manage. Policy, 12(1), 378–394.
Small, K. A., and Gómez-Ibáñez, J. A. (1999). “Urban transportation.” Handbook of regional and urban economics, P. Chelshire and E. S. Mills, ed., Vol. 3, Applied Urban Economics, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
TARTA (Toledo Area Rapid Transit Authority). (2007). “Mass transit history in Toledo and Presentation to Toledo Blade Editorial Board Tuesday, October 16, 2007.” Toledo, OH.
Taylor, B., Mark, G., and Hiroyuki, I. (2000). “Measuring cost variability in the provision of transit service.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1735, 101–112.
Taylor, B. D., Douglas, M., Hiroyuki, I., and Camille, F. (2009). “Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across U.S. urbanized areas.” Transp. Res. Part A: Pract. Policy, 43(1), 60–77.
Taylor, B. D., and Samples, K.(2002). “Jobs, jobs, jobs: Political perceptions, economic reality, and capital bias in U.S. transit subsidy policy.” Publics Works Manage. Policy, 6(4), 250–263.
The Blade. (2010). “Perrysburg mayor won’t advise how to vote on TARTA funding levy.” 〈http://www.toledoblade.com/South/2007/10/25/Perrysburg-mayor-won-t-advise-how-to-vote-on-TARTA-funding-levy.html〉 (Jul. 29, 2015).
Transit Cooperative Research Program. (1997). “Funding strategies for public transportation.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT BTS (U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics). (2003)., Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT BTS (U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics). (2005). “Survey of state funding for public transportation 2005.” 〈http://www.apta.com/research/info/online/documents/survey_of_state_funding_05.pdf〉 (Oct. 6, 2008).
Vickrey, W. S. (1994). “Marginal cost pricing.” Public economics: Selected papers by William Vickrey, I. R. Arnott, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wachs, M. (2005). “Improving efficiency and equity in transportation finance.” Taking the high road: A metropolitan agenda for transportation reform, B. Katz and R. Puentes, eds., Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 77–100.
Webber, M. (1976). The BART experience—What have we learned?, Institute of Urban and Regional Development and Institute of Transportation Studies, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Wilson, W. J. (2000). The state of American cities in social exclusion and the future of cities, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 4December 2016

History

Received: Mar 2, 2015
Accepted: Dec 7, 2015
Published online: Mar 21, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 21, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hiroyuki Iseki, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Urban Studies and Planning, School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share