Empirical Analysis of a Mode Shift to Using Public Bicycles to Access the Suburban Metro: Survey of Nanjing, China
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 2
Abstract
The combined use of a public bicycle system (PBS) and transit is considered a green and efficient travel mode, yet few studies have focused on users’ perceptions of this integrated mode. This study investigated commuters who recently began using PBS to access the metro, referred to herein as the metro-PBS, and commuters who drive to work in suburban Nanjing, China, which is an area where PBS is in early developmental stages. First, a survey was conducted to obtain the personal characteristics of the metro-PBS users and their before-and-after commuting experiences. Then, a comparative analysis was performed, which revealed that saving time, energy, and money are the critical motivating factors of their mode shift behavior. The users’ personal characteristics vary with their previous modes, but the users are generally characterized as well educated with regard to environmental protection. In contrast to many other bike sharing investigations, the results showed a significant motor vehicle trip substitution. Another survey was conducted to investigate drivers’ perceptions of the metro-PBS. Of the respondents, 62.8% exhibited a willingness to change to metro-PBS. A binary logit model was built to reveal the factors affecting mode selection behavior, and the key factors identified were gender, employment status, and the comfort level associated with travel experiences. Male motorists who are lower-level employees or have unpleasant commute experiences are more likely to be attracted to metro-PBS. Based on the findings, suggestions are presented for building a user-friendly metro-PBS system that attracts motorists. This case study concludes that metro-PBS can be an ideal travel mode for suburban commuters and thus can contribute to reducing car travel under some circumstances.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51338003, 51378120) and National Basic Research 973 Program (2012CB725400). The authors thank all graduate research assistants for their work in the investigation and data processing. All the authors of the following references are very much appreciated.
References
Brons, M., Givoni, M., and Rietveld, P. (2009). “Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use.” Transp. Res. Part A, 43(2), 136–149.
Callister, D., and Lowry, M. (2013). “Tools and strategies for wide-scale bicycle level-of-service analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 250–257.
Cherry, C. R., and Cervero, R. (2007). “Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China.” Transp. Policy, 14(3), 247–257.
Dell’Olio, L., et al. (2014). “Modeling the effects of pro bicycle infrastructure and policies toward sustainable urban mobility.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 04014001.
Devvy Bikes. (2013). “Devvy data challenge.” 〈https://www.divvybikes.com/datachallenge〉 (May 25, 2014).
Fishman, E., Washington, S., and Haworth, N. (2012a). “Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use: A qualitative approach.” Transp. Res. Part F-Traffic Psychol. Behav., 15(6), 686–698.
Fishman, E., Washington, S., and Haworth, N. (2012b). “Understanding the fear of bicycle riding in Australia.” J. Australas. College Road Saf., 23(3), 19–27.
Fishman, E., Washington, S., and Haworth, N. (2013). “Bike share: A synthesis of the literature.” Transp. Rev., 33(2), 148–165.
Fuller, D., et al. (2011). “Use of a new public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada.” Am. J. Preventive Med., 41(1), 80–83.
Garrard, J. (2009). Active transport: Adults (an overview of recent evidence), VicHealth, Melbourne, Australia.
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., and Maat, K. (2010) “Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature.” Transp. Rev., 30(1), 59–96.
Horton, D., Rosen, P., and Cox, P. (2007). Cycling and society, Ashgate, Farnham, U.K.
Hubway Data Challenge Org. (2013). “The Hubway trip history data.” 〈http://hubwaydatachallenge.org/trip-history-data/〉 (May 25, 2014).
Lansell, K. (2011). “Melbourne bike share and public transport integration.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
LDA Consulting. (2012). “Capital Bikeshare 2011 member survey report.” Washington, DC.
Murphy, H. (2010). “Dublin bikes: An investigation in the context of multimodal transport.” M.Sc. thesis, Sustainable Development, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland.
Nadal, L. (2007). “Bike sharing sweeps Paris off its feet.” Sustainable Transp. Mag., (19), 8–13.
Nanjing Planning Bureau. (2012). Transport Annual Rep. 2012, Nanjing, China.
NYC Bike Share. (2014). “Citi bike trip histories.” 〈http://www.citibikenyc.com/system-data〉 (May 10, 2014).
Ogilvie, F., and Goodman, A. (2012). “Inequities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: Sociographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (U.K.) cycle hire scheme.” Preventive Med., 55(1), 40–45.
Pucher, J., and Buehler, R. (2011). “Analysis of bicycling trends and policies in large North American cities: Lessons for New York.” 〈https://www.springfieldmo.gov/planning/pdfs/bike_trends.pdf〉 (May 25, 2014).
Pucher, J., Greaves, S., and Garrard, J. (2012). “Cycling down under: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies in Sydney and Melbourne.” J. Transp. Geogr., 19(2), 332–345.
Rastogi, R. (2010). “Willingness to shift to walking or bicycling to access suburban rail: Case study of Mumbai, India.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 3–10.
Schneider, R. J. (2013). “Theory of routine mode choice decisions: An operational framework to increase sustainable transportation.” Transp. Policy, 25, 128–137.
Shaheen, S., et al. (2011). “Hangzhou public bicycle: Understanding early adoption and behavioural response to bike sharing in Hangzhou, China.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–41.
Shaheen, S., Martin, E., and Cohen, A. P. (2012). “Public bikesharing in North America: Early operator and user understanding.” Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA.
Shaheen, S. A., Guzman, S., and Zhang, H. (2010). “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 159–167.
Transport for London. (2010). Travel in London Rep. 3, London.
Uslu, C., et al. (2010). “Bicycle master plan for Adana, Turkey.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 62–69.
Virginia Tech. (2012). “Capital bikeshare study: A closer look at casual users and operation.” Arlington, VA.
Wang, Y., Li, L., Wang, Z., Lv, T., and Wang, L. (2013). “Mode shift behavior impacts from the introduction of metro service: Case study of Xi’an, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 216–225.
Wiersma, B. (2010). Bicycle sharing system: Role, effects and application to Plymouth, Univ. of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Xu, Y., Chan, E. H., and Yung, E. H. (2013). “Analysis of the mechanisms contributing to spatial mismatch in transitional Chinese cities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 04013011.
Yang, T., Pan, H. and Shen, Q. (2011). “Bike-sharing systems in Beijing, Shanghai and Hangzhou and their impact on travel behavior.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 123–127.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142 • Issue 2 • June 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 22, 2014
Accepted: Jun 12, 2015
Published online: Oct 19, 2015
Discussion open until: Mar 19, 2016
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.