Case Studies
Aug 22, 2014

Impact of Urban Green Space on Residential Housing Prices: Case Study in Shenzhen

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 141, Issue 4

Abstract

Public resources such as transportation, hospitals, parks, and schools are important factors in housing prices. However, studies on property value have mainly concentrated on transportation, and few studies have focused on the effect that green space has on property values. Researchers have mainly focused on specific parks within different communities rather than parks (on a larger scale) to study the average impact of green space on housing prices. Therefore, the objective of this research is to quantify the effect of public resources on property value, especially green space, using the hedonic pricing method (HPM). This paper focuses on 71 parks within Shenzhen to make results universal. Transaction price data and the structural attributes of 6,473 dwelling units were collected. This paper looks at HPM from three dimensions: structural attributes, location variables, and environmental variables. The results showed that (1) proximity to a central business district (CBD) produced the greatest effect on housing prices, followed by distance to park, distance to school, distance to arterial road, and distance to subway; (2) proximity to a park noticeably contributes to housing prices at 0.041%, and housing prices decline at a rate of 20,920  CNY  (US$3,356)/km depending on distance to the nearest park; and (3) the average influence radius of Shenzhen parks was 1.73 km, and the 71 parks could promote an increase in value across 412.14km2 of land. This research will be helpful in residential housing purchase decision-making, for reasonable estate development layouts (for developers), and for governments (in terms of increasing environmental tax to promote green space preservation).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271101) and the Seed Funding Programme for Basic Research of the University of Hong Kong (201211159155). The authors thank Wang Xin [Department of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Science (CASS), China] for reading an earlier draft of this article and for making many helpful suggestions.

References

Baranzini, A., and Schaerer, C. (2011). “A sight for sore eyes: Assessing the value of view and land use in the housing market.” J. Hous. Econ., 20(3), 191–199.
Brasington, D. M., and Hite, D. (2008). “A mixed index approach to identifying hedonic price models.” Reg. Sci. Urban. Econ., 38(3), 271–284.
Chen, W. Y., and Jim, C. Y. (2010). “Amenities and disamenities: A hedonic analysis of the heterogeneous urban landscape in Shenzhen (China).” Geog. J., 176(3), 227–240.
Chiesura, A. (2004). “The role of urban parks for the sustainable city.” Landscape Urban Plann., 68(1), 129–138.
Chin, H. C., and Foong, K. W. (2006). “Influence of school accessibility on housing values.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 120–129.
Cho, S. H., Bowker, J. M., and Park, W. M. (2006). “Measuring the contribution of water and green space amenities to housing values: An application and comparison of spatially weighted hedonic models.” J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 31(3), 485–507.
Darling, A. H. (1973). “Measuring benefits generated by urban water parks.” Land Econ., 49(1), 22–34.
Doss, C. R., and Taff, S. J. (1996). “The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values.” J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21(1), 120–129.
Dziauddin, M. F., Alvanides, S., and Powe, N. (2013). “Estimating the effects of light rail transit (LRT) system on the property values in the Klang Valley, Malaysia: A hedonic house price approach.” Jurnal Teknologi., 61(1), 35–47.
Gómez, F., Jabaloyes, J., Montero, L., De Vicente, V., and Valcuende, M. (2010). “Green areas, the most significant indicator of the sustainability of cities: Research on their utility for urban planning.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 311–328.
Ham, Y. J., Maddison, D. J., and Elliott, R. J. (2013). “The valuation of landfill disamenities in Birmingham.” Ecol. Econ., 85(5), 116–129.
Jim, C. Y., and Chen, W. Y. (2006). “Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China).” Landscape Urban Plann., 78(4), 422–434.
Jim, C. Y., and Chen, W. Y. (2010). “External effects of neighborhood parks and landscape elements on high-rise residential value.” Land Use Pol., 27(2), 662–670.
Kong, F., Yin, H., and Nakagoshi, N. (2007). “Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China.” Landscape Urban Plann., 79(3), 240–252.
Li, L, and Wang, B. (2010). “Research on effects of public real estate price in Wuxi City.” Resour. Dev. Market., 26(9), 793–798.
Liu, B., Hong, T., and Pan, L. (2010). “The general planning ideas of urban nature reserve: A study on Shenzhen Dapeng peninsula nature reserve.” Urban Plann. Forum, 192(7), 54–59.
Liu, S., and Hite, D. (2013). “Measuring the effect of green space on property value: An application of the hedonic spatial quintile regression.” Southern Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA) Annual Meeting, Vol. 2, IDEAS, St. Louis, 3–5.
Luttik, J. (2000). “The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands.” Landscape Urban Plann., 48(3), 161–167.
Ma, C. (1995). “Study on the threshold of resources eco-economical system and sustainable utilization of resources.” China Popul. Resour. Environ., 5(4), 17–21.
Mahan, B. L., Polasky, S., and Adams, R. M. (2000). “Valuing urban wetlands: A property price approach.” Land. Econ., 76(1), 100–113.
Maimaitiyiming, M., et al. (2014). “Effects of green space spatial pattern on land surface temperature: Implications for sustainable urban planning and climate change adaptation.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 89(3), 59–66.
Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., and St Leger, L. (2006). “Healthy nature healthy people: ‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations.” Health. Promot. Int., 21(1), 45–54.
Morancho, A. B. (2003). “A hedonic valuation of urban green areas.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 66(1), 35–41.
Pan, Q. (2013). “The impacts of an urban light rail system on residential property values: A case study of the Houston METRORail transit line.” Transp. Plann. Technol., 36(2), 145–169.
Poudyal, N. C., Hodges, D. G., and Merrett, C. D. (2009). “A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks.” Land Use Policy, 26(4), 975–983.
Qiu, H., Jiang, D., and Yi, X. (2011). “Impacts of public landscape in Zhu Zhou city on the price of peripheral houses: Empirical research based on hedonic model.” Econ. Geog., 31(12), 2005–2010.
Rosen, S. (1974). “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition.” J. Polit. Econ., 82(1), 34–55.
Sander, H. A., and Polasky, S. (2009). “The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA.” Land Use Policy, 26(3), 837–845.
Shi, Y., and Zhang, R. (2010). “Temporal-spatial impact effects of large-scale parks on residential prices exemplified by the Huangxing Park in Shanghai.” Geog. Res., 29(3), 510–520.
Smith, V. K., Poulos, C., and Kim, H. (2002). “Treating open space as an urban amenity.” Resour. Energy Econ., 24(1), 107–129.
SOFANG. (1999). “So Fang flagship website.” 〈http://sz.fang.com〉 (Nov. 3, 2012) (in Chinese).
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 19.0) [Computer software]. Stanford, CA, Stanford Univ.
Sui, D. Z., and Zeng, H. (2001). “Modeling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia’s emerging desakota regions: A case study in Shenzhen.” Landscape Urban Plann., 53(1), 37–52.
Tyrväinen, L., and Miettinen, A. (2000). “Property prices and urban forest amenities.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 39(2), 205–223.
Wang, D., and Huang, W. (2007). “Effect of urban environment on residential property values by hedonic method: A case study of Shanghai.” City Plann. Rev., 31(9), 34–43.
Wang, Z., and Qin, W. (2009). “The research review of hedonic pricing method.” Econ. Forum, 6(12), 129–131.
Wei, J. F., Wei, Y. G., and Jiang, K. (2014). “Study on the affecting factors of housing prices along rail transit based on hedonic price model: Case study of Beijing subway line 5.” Appl. Mech. Mater., 507(6), 642–645.
Wen, H., and Jia, S. (2004). “Housing characteristics and hedonic price: Analysis based on hedonic price model.” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci., 38(10), 1338–1349.
Wen, H., and Li, X. (2012). “The effect of urban landscape on residential property value: A case study in Hangzhou.” Geog. Res., 31(10), 1806–1814.
Wen, H., Pu, X., and Qin, Z. (2012). “The spatial effect of urban lakes on housing prices: The case of the West Lake in Hangzhou.” Econ. Geog., 32(11), 58–64.
Wolf, K. L. (2007). “City trees and property values.” Arborist News, 16(4), 34–36.
Wu, D., Guo, Z., and Chen, H. (2008). “Impact of lake landscape on urban residential property values in Nanjing.” Resour. Sci., 30(10), 1503–1510.
Xie, G., and Zhang, B. (2012). “The effects of public green spaces on residential property value in Beijing.” J. Resour. Ecol., 3(3), 243–252.
Yin, H., and Kong, F. (2003). “Accessibility analysis of urban green space in Jinan.” J. Plant Ecol., 30(1), 17–24.
Yin, H., and Xu, J. (2009). “Impact of the amenity value of urban green space on the price of house in Shanghai.” Acta. Ecologica Sinica, 29(8), 4492–4500.
Yusuf, A. A., and Resosudarmo, B. P. (2009). “Does clean air matter in developing countries’ megacities? A hedonic price analysis of the Jakarta housing market, Indonesia.” Ecol. Econ., 68(5), 1398–1407.
Zhang, B., and Xie, G. (2012). “The value-added effect of park green space on residential property in Beijing.” Resour. Sci., 34(7), 1347–1353.
Zhong, H. Y., Zhang, A. L., and Cai, Y. Y. (2009). “Impacts of the Nanhu Lake in Wuhan City on the price of peripheral houses: Empirical research based on hedonic model.” China Land Sci., 23(12), 63–68.
Zhou, H., Shi, P., Wang, J. A., Yu, D., and Gao, L. (2010). “Rapid urbanization and implications for river ecological services restoration: Case study in Shenzhen, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 121–132.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 141Issue 4December 2015

History

Received: Dec 4, 2013
Accepted: Jul 15, 2014
Published online: Aug 22, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 22, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jiansheng Wu [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory for Environment and Urban Sciences, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking Univ., Shenzhen 518055, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Meijuan Wang [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, Key Laboratory for Environment and Urban Sciences, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking Univ., Shenzhen 518055, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Urban and Environment Sciences, Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, Peking Univ., Beijing 100871, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3021. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share