Technical Papers
Jun 15, 2012

Multicriteria Decision Making for Homeowners’ Participation in Building Maintenance

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138, Issue 2

Abstract

As the residential building stocks in most developed cities are getting older, there is an urgent call for the management of the stocks in a more sustainable manner. Although redevelopment can completely revamp the quality of housing, this approach is far from perfect because of its negative social and environmental effects. In fact, timely maintenance can achieve sustainable housing stock management in theory. However, in a high-rise setting, a large number of homeowners are involved in the maintenance of communal building elements. Conflicts occur because of the divergent interests of different stakeholders in deciding on the way forward for a maintenance project, eventually holding the work back. Against this background, this study explores the relative importance of different criteria for decision making in the maintenance of multiowned residential buildings in Hong Kong. Through a literature review, a set of decision-making criteria were identified. The weightings of these criteria perceived by homeowners were evaluated using the nonstructural fuzzy decision support system. The results of the analysis showed that cost affordability of maintenance work and existing building conditions generally dominated the decision-making process. Practical implications for urban managers and public administrators in formulating the strategies to promote housing maintenance then follow.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported jointly by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. CityU 1508/08) and the Start-Up Grant for New Staff from City Univ. of Hong Kong (Project No. 7200123). The findings of the pilot study were presented in the European Network for Housing Research Annual Conf. 2009 in Prague, and the author would like to thank the conference delegates for their valuable comments and suggestions for the development of this paper.

References

Andersen, H. S. (1998). “Motives for investments in housing rehabilitation among private landlords under rent control.” Hous. Stud., 13(2), 177–200.
Ashworth, A. (1996). Assessing the life expectancies of buildings and their components in life cycle costing, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
Bengtsson, B. (2000). “Solving the tenants’ dilemma: Collective action and norms of co-operation in housing.” Hous. Theory Soc., 17(4), 175–187.
Boelhouwer, J. (2002). “Social indicators and living conditions in the Netherlands.” Soc. Indic. Res., 60(1), 89–113.
Buildings Dept. (2002). Monthly digest, March 2002, Buildings Dept., Hong Kong.
Buildings Dept. (2010). Monthly digest, March 2010, Buildings Dept., Hong Kong.
Call for action on squalid buildings.” (2005). The Standard, May 4, E09.
Chanter, B., and Swallow, P. (1996). Building maintenance management, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Cheung, S. N. S. (1975). “Roofs or stars: The stated intents and actual effects of a rents ordinance.” Econ. InquiryECIND6, 13(1), 1–21.
Chew, M. Y. L., Tan, S. S., and Kang, K. H. (2004). “Building maintainability—Review of state of the art.” J. Archit. Eng.JAEIED, 10(3), 80–87.
Chinloy, P. (1980). “The effect of maintenance expenditures on the measurement of depreciation in housing.” J. Urban Econ.JUECDW, 8(1), 86–107.
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Freitas, V. (2010). “Discussion of criteria for prioritization of predictive maintenance of building facades: Survey of 30 experts.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil.JPCFEV, 24(4), 337–344.
Hassanain, M. A., Froese, T. M., and Vanier, D. J. (2003). “Framework model for asset maintenance management.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil.JPCFEV, 17(1), 51–64.
Helbers, L., and McDowell, J. L. (1982). Determinants of housing repair and improvement, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Hendershott, P. H., and Shilling, J. D. (1982). “The economics of tenure choice, 1955–1979.” Research in real estate, Sirmans, C. F., ed., JAI Press, London, 105–133.
Ho, D. C. W. (1993). “Maintenance management of ageing buildings in Hong Kong.” Prop. Manage., 11(3), 240–245.
Ho, D. C. W., et al. (2008). “A survey of the health and safety conditions of apartment buildings in Hong Kong.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 43(5), 764–775.
Ho, D. C. W., Tam, C. M., and Yiu, C. Y. (2004). “Criteria and weighting of a value age index for residential use.” Building dilapidation and rejuvenation in Hong Kong, Leung, A. Y. T. and Yiu, C. Y., eds., City Univ. of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors, Hong Kong, 97–112.
Home Affairs Dept. (2009). “Database of private buildings in Hong Kong.” 〈https://bmis.buildingmgt.gov.hk/eng/building.php〉 (May 13, 2009).
Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau. (2005). Building management and maintenance—Public consultation on mandatory building inspection, Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau, Hong Kong.
Itard, L., and Klunder, G. (2007). “Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction.” Build. Res. Inf.BREIEA, 35(3), 252–267.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities, Vintage, New York.
Khademi, N., and Sheikholeslami, A. (2010). “Multicriteria group decision-making technique for a low-class road maintenance program.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 16(3), 188–198.
Knight, J. R., and Sirmans, C. F. (1996). “Depreciation, maintenance, and housing prices.” J. Hous. Econ., 5(4), 369–389.
Leather, P., Littlewood, A., and Munro, M. (1998). Make do and mend? Explaining homeowners’ approaches to repair and maintenance, The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
Littlewood, A., and Munro, M. (1996). “Explaining disrepair: Examining owner occupiers’ repair and maintenance behaviour.” Housing Stud., 11(4), 503–525.
Littlewood, A., and Munro, M. (1997). “Moving and improving: Strategies for attaining housing equilibrium.” Urban Stud., 34(11), 1771–1787.
Margolis, S. E. (1981). “Depreciation and maintenance of houses.” Land Econ.LAECAD, 57(1), 91–105.
Montgomery, C. (1992). “Explaining home improvement in the context of household investment in residential housing.” J. Urban Econ.JUECDW, 32(3), 326–350.
Newman, S. J. (2005). Low-end rental housing: The forgotten story in Baltimore’s housing boom, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
Nield, S. (1990). “Legal framework of deeds of mutual covenant.” Multi-storey building management, Nield, S. and Sihombing, J., eds., Hong Kong Law Journal, Hong Kong, 1–25.
Oberle, R., and James, W. G. (2008). “Developing O&M plans for homeowners associations: Case study.” J. Archit. Eng.JAEIED, 14(3), 76–84.
Ohmer, M. L. (2007). “Citizen participation in neighbourhood organizations and its relationship to volunteer’s self- and collective efficacy and sense of community.” Soc. Work Res., 31(2), 109–120.
Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D. A., Brulnsma, F., Vreeker, R., and Munda, G. (2009). “Decision aid with the MCDA-RES software: A wind-hydro energy application for an island of the Aegean, Greece.” Energy SourcesEGYSAO, 4(4), 407–419.
Rothenberg, J. (1969). Economic evaluation of urban renewal: Conceptual foundation of benefit-cost analysis, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
Shear, W. B. (1983). “Urban housing rehabilitation and move decisions.” South. Econ. J.SECJAR, 49(4), 1030–1052.
Shen, Q., Lo, K. K., and Wang, Q. (1998). “Priority setting in maintenance: A modified multi-attribute approach using analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 16(6), 693–702.
Sohail, M., Cavill, S., and Cotton, A. P. (2005). “Sustainable operation and maintenance of urban infrastructure: Myth or reality?.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 131(1), 39–49.
Spivack, R. N. (1991). “The determinants of housing maintenance and upkeep: A case study of Providence, Rhode Island.” Appl. Econ.APPEBP, 23(6), 639–646.
Stewart, J. (2003). “Encouraging home-owners to maintain their homes: Initiatives in the Bellenden Renewal Area, Peckham.” J. Environ. Health Res.EHAGAB, 2(1), 10–21.
Struyk, R. J., and Lynn, R. (1983). “Determinants of housing investment in slum areas: Tondo and other locations in metro Manila.” Land Econ.LAECAD, 59(4), 444–454.
Sweeney, J. L. (1974). “Quality, commodity hierarchies, and housing markets.” EconometricaECMTA7, 42(1), 147–167.
Tam, C. M., Tam, V. W. Y., and Tsui, W. S. (2004). “Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 22(7), 563–571.
Tam, C. M., Tong, T. K. L., Chiu, G. C. W., and Fung, I. W. H. (2002a). “Non-structural fuzzy decision support system for evaluation of construction safety management system.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 20(4), 303–313.
Tam, C. M., Tong, T. K. L., Leung, A. W. T., and Chiu, G. W. C. (2002b). “Site layout planning using nonstructural fuzzy decision support system.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 128(3), 220–231.
Walters, M. (2002). “Transaction costs of collective action in Hong Kong high rise real estate.” Int. J. Soc. Econ.ISLEBC, 29(4), 299–314.
Werczberger, E., and Ginsberg, Y. (1987). “Maintenance of shared property in low-income condominiums.” Hous. Stud., 2(3), 192–202.
Winger, A. R. (1973). “Some internal determinants of upkeep spending by urban home-owners.” Land Econ.LAECAD, 49(4), 474–479.
Wong, S. K., Cheung, A. K. C., Yau, Y., Chau, K. W., and Ho, D. C. W. (2005). “Distinguishing the decrepit from the old: Is building age a good proxy of building performance?Tall buildings—From engineering to sustainability, Cheung, Y. K. and Chau, K. W., eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 687–692.
Yau, Y. (2009). “Weightings of decision-making criteria for the maintenance of multi-storey residential buildings in Hong Kong.” 〈http://www.soc.cas.cz/download/986/paper_yau_w09.pdf〉 (Feb. 12, 2011).
Yau, Y. (2010). “Sense of community and homeowners’ participation in housing management: a study in Hong Kong.” Urbani Izziv, 21(1), 126–135.
Yau, Y. (2011). “Collectivism and activism in housing management in Hong Kong.” Habitat Int., 35(2), 327–334.
Yau, Y., Ho, D. C. W., and Chau, K. W. (2008). “Determinants of the safety performance of private multi-storey residential buildings in Hong Kong.” Soc. Indic. Res., 89(3), 501–521.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138Issue 2June 2012
Pages: 110 - 120

History

Received: Nov 21, 2010
Accepted: Oct 17, 2011
Published online: Oct 20, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Published ahead of production: Jun 15, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Public and Social Administration, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PRC. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share