Exploring Determinants of Pedestrians’ Satisfaction with Sidewalk Environments: Case Study in Korea
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138, Issue 2
Abstract
This study intends to explore people’s satisfaction with sidewalk environments and to examine its association with emotional perceptions and physical components. A perception survey was taken to evaluate the emotional perceptions of 20 sidewalk environments with 105 participants. Two perception factors were identified as harmoniousness and openness through factor analysis. Then, a path model was tested to examine the relationship among satisfaction, identified perception factors, and physical components of sidewalk environments. The path model demonstrates a good fit with the data. Furthermore, the results show that overall satisfaction is more strongly directly affected by perception factors than by physical components. The indirect effects of physical components on overall satisfaction through emotional perceptions are much more than the direct effect. This study provides a useful method to connect emotional perceptions and physical components of and overall satisfaction with the sidewalk environments simultaneously. With refinements of the perception survey, the method can be a powerful tool to inform urban planners and designers of what should be priority aspects when designing the sidewalk environment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61074141.
References
Akbar, K. F., Hale, W. H. G., and Headley, A. D. (2003). “Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England.” Landscape Urban Plann.LUPLEZ, 63(3), 139–144.
Amerigo, M. (2002). “A psychological approach to the study of residential satisfaction.” Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction, and behavior, Aragones, J. I., Francescato, G., and Garling, T., eds., Bergin and Garvey Publishers, Westport, CT, 81–99.
Amerigo, M., and Aragones, J. I. (1997). “A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction.” J. Environ. Psychol., 17(1), 47–57.JEPSEO
Amistad, F. (2010). “Assessment of the pedestrianization policies in Vigan City: UNESCO World Heritage Site.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 136(1), 11–22.
Balram, S., and Dragicevic, S. (2005). “Attitudes toward urban green spaces: Integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements.” Landscape Urban plannLUPLEZ, 71(2–4), 147–162.
Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., and Bonnes, M. (2003). “Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study on the city of Rome.” Landscape Urban Plann.LUPLEZ, 65(1–2), 41–52.
Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). “Alternative ways of assessing model fit.” Testing structural equation models, Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S., eds., Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 136–161.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Clifton, K. J., Smith, A. D. L., and Rodriguez, D. (2007). “The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment.” Landscape Urban Plann.LUPLEZ, 80(1–2), 95–100.
Echelberger, H. E. (1979). “The semantic differential in landscape research.” Proc., Our National Landscape: A Conf. on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource, USDA, Washington, DC, 524–531.
Ergin, A., Karaesmen, E., Micallef, A., and Williams, A. T. (2004). “A new methodology for evaluating coastal scenery: Fuzzy logic systems.” Area, 36(4), 367–386.AREAB6
Evans-Cowley, J. (2006). “Sidewalk planning and policies in small cities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 132(2), 71–75.
Francescato, G. (2002). “Residential satisfaction research: The case for and against.” Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction, and behavior, Aragones, G., Francescato, G., and Garling, T., eds., Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CT, 15–34.
Frank, L. D., and Engelke, P. O. (2001). “The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health.” J. Plann. Lit., 16(2), 202–218.
Fujiyama, T., Childs, C., Boampong, D., and Tyler, N. (2005). “Investigation of lighting levels for pedestrians: Some questions about lighting levels of current lighting standards.” 6th Int. Conf. on Walking in the 21st Century, Walk21, Cheltenham, UK.
Gold, M. S., and Bentler, P. M. (2000). “Treatments of missing data: A Monte Carlo comparison of RBHDI, iterative stochastic regression imputation, and expectation-maximization.” Struct. Equ. Model., 7(3), 319–355.
Graham, J. W., and Hofer, S. M. (2000). “Multiple imputation in multivariate research.” Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples, Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., and J. Baumert, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 201–218.
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., and Killingworth, R. E. (2002). “How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning.” Am. J. Prev. Med., 23(2), 64–73.AJPMEA
Hochberg, J. (1966). “Representative sampling and the purposes of research: Pictures of the world and the world of pictures.” The Psychology of Egon Brunswik, Hammond, K., ed., Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 361–381.
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). “The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues.” Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, Hoyle, R. H., ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1–15.
Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). “Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.” Struct. Equ. Model., 6(1), 1–55.
Hur, M. (2008). “Factors that influence resident’s satisfaction with neighborhood.” Environ. Behav.EVBHAF, 40(5), 619–635.
Kamičaitytė-Virbašienė, J., and Janušaitis, R. (2004). “Some methodical aspects of landscape visual quality preferences analysis.” Environ. Res. Eng. Manage., 3(29), 51–60.
Kaplan, R. (1985). “Nature at the doorstep: Residential satisfaction and the nearby environment.” J. Archit. Plann. Res.JAPRER, 2(2), 115–127.
Kim, S., Choi, J., and Kim, Y. (2011). “Determining the sidewalk pavement width by using pedestrian discomfort levels and movement characteristics.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 15(5), 883–889.
Kinoshita, Y., Cooper, E. W., Hoshino, Y., and Kamei, K. (2004). “A townscape evaluation system based on Kansei and colour harmony models.” Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, IEEE, New York, 327–332.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd Ed., Guilford, New York.
Lansing, J. B., and Marans, R. W. (1969). “Planner’s notebook: Evaluation of neighborhood quality.” J. Am. Inst. Planners, 35(3), 195–199.
Lee, B. J., Jang, T. Y., Wang, W., and Namgung, M. (2009). “Design criteria for an urban sidewalk landscape considering emotional perception.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 135(4), 133–140.
Li, S. P., and Will, B. F. (2005). “A fuzzy logic system for visual evaluation.” Environ. Plann. B, 32(2), 293–304.EPSBD9
Lim, E. M., Honjo, T., and Umeki, K. (2006). “The validity of VRML images as a stimulus for landscape assessment” Landscape Urban Plann.LUPLEZ, 77(1–2), 80–93.
Litman, T. A. (2003). “Economic value of walkability.” Transportation Research Record 1828, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 3–11.
Lund, H. (2002). “Pedestrian environments and sense of community.” J. Plann. Educ. Res., 21(3), 301–312.
MacCallum, R. C., and Austin, J. T. (2000). “Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.” Ann. Rev. Psychol.ARPSAC, 51(1), 201–226.
Marans, R. W. (1976). “Perceived quality of residential environments: Some methodological issues.” Perceiving environmental quality: Research and applications, Craik, K. H. and Zube, E. H., eds., Plenum, New York, 123–147.
McDonald, R. P., and Ho, M. H. (2002). “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.” Psychol. Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
McHarg, I. (1969). Design with nature, Natural History, New York.
Nasar, J. L. (1988). “Perception and evaluation of residential street scenes.” Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications, Nasar, J. L., ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 275–289.
Nasar, J. L. (1997). The evaluative image of the city, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Nasar, J. L., and Hong, X. (1999). “Visual preferences in urban signscapes.” Environ. Behav.EVBHAF, 31(5), 671–691.
Osgood, C. E. (1969). “The nature and measurement of meaning.” Semantic differential technique: A source book, Osgood, C. E. and Snider, J. G., eds., Aldine, Chicago, 3–41.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Øvstedal, L., and Ryeng, E. O. (2004). PROMPT Pedestrian Comfort Synthesis Rep., SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
Rahaman, K. R., Lourenço, J. M., and Viegas, J. M. (2011). “Perceptions of pedestrians and shopkeepers in European medium-sized cities: A study of Guimarães, Portugal.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 138(1), 26–34.
Raman, B., and Naderi, J. R. (2006). “Computer based pedestrian landscape design using decision tree templates.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 20(1), 23–30.
Randall, A. T., and Baetz, W. B. (2001). “Evaluating pedestrian connectivity for suburban sustainability.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 127(1), 1–15.
Schroeder, H. W., and Cannon, W. N. Jr. (1987). “Visual quality of residential streets: Both street and yard trees make a difference.” J. Arboric., 13(10), 236–239.JOARDF
Shibata, T., and Kato, T. (1998). “Modeling of subjective interpretation for street landscape image.” Progress in artificial intelligence, LNCS 1460, Neves, J., Santos, M. F., and Machado, J. M., eds., Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 501–510.
Southworth, M. (2005). “Designing the walkable city.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM, 131(4), 246–257.
Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., and Aikoh, T. (2004). “Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan.” Landscape Urban Plann.LUPLEZ, 69(4), 403–419.
Tsumita, H., Sekido, Y., and Hamamoto, S. A. (2006). “Correlation analysis of an atmosphere and indication element of street space by psychological quantity distribution figure: Study of Kehai in urban street spaces (Part 2).” J. Archit. Plann. Res.JAPRER, 607, 41–48 (in Japanese).
Wei, T. Y. (2010). “corrplot: Visualization of a correlation matrix.” 〈http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/index.html〉 (Oct. 15, 2010).
Williams, K. (2002). “Exploring resident preferences for street trees in Melbourne, Australia” J. Arboric.JOARDF, 28(4), 161–169.
Wolf, K. L. (2006). “Assessing public response to freeway roadsides: Urban forestry and context sensitive solutions.” Paper 06-1586, Proc. 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Zube, E. H., Pitt, D. G., and Anderson, T. W. (1975). “Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the northeast.” Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions, and resources, Zube, E. H., Brush, R. O., and Fabos, J. G., eds., Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA, 151–167.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138 • Issue 2 • June 2012
Pages: 166 - 172
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 10, 2010
Accepted: Oct 13, 2011
Published online: Oct 17, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Published ahead of production: Jun 15, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.