Abstract

The study is based on developing a bikeway master plan by determining the utility of bicycle routes, assessing their contributions to urban transportation, their effect on individual and social leisure time activities, and the behavior and demands of the people in the City of Adana, Turkey. Sixteen routes were evaluated according to 14 criteria that include physical and environmental conditions, land use types, and user characteristics to determine level of service. The results ranged from 2.15 to 58.32 on a 90-point scale. The total length of bicycle routes included in the study (110.9 km) reached 120 km by adding 9.1 km of additional routes to provide continuity of the routes and demands of the user. Three different bikeway types were predicted for the study area, taking into account the width of the roads, the possibilities for expansion (land use type and expropriation requirements at road boundaries), and vehicle/pedestrian circulation density. Bicycle paths that were grade-separated from pedestrian and vehicular roads formed 29.8 km. Bicycle lanes designated as pedestrian roads formed 10.2 km. Bicycle lanes designated as vehicular roads formed 80 km.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was part of the Project Adana Kentsel Alanında Bisikletli Bağlantı Olanaklarının Araştırılması Ve Bir Ana Düzentasar Önerisi Geliştirilmesi (Investigating the Bicycle Network Potential of Adana City and Proposing a Master Plan), funded by TÜBİTAK, the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.

References

Adana Büyükşehir Belediyesi (Adana Urban Council). (2005). “2005 Yılında Rakamlarla Adana [Adana with numbers in the year of 2005].” Adana Anakent Belediyesi Raporu [The Report of Adana Urban Council], Turkey (in Turkish).
Altunkasa, M. F., Uslu, C., and Boyacıgil, O. (2007). “Adana kuzeybatı üst kentsel gelişme alanında bisikletli bağlantı olanaklarının değerlendirilmesine ekolojik ve ekonomik bir yaklaşım [An ecological and economical approach to determining the bicycling connection possibilities of the upper North-West urban development area of Adana City].” Proje No:.ZF2004BAP11, Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri [Çukurova Univ. Scientific Research project], Adana (in Turkish).
Altunkasa, M. F., Uslu, C., Boyacıgil, O., and Konaklı, N. (2006). “Adana kentsel alanında bisikletli bağlantı olanaklarının araştırılması ve bir ana düzentasar önerisi geliştirilmesi [Investigating the bicycle network potential of Adana city and proposing master plan].” TÜBİTAK/Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırma Grubu 104K058 No’lu Proje Kesin Raporu, Adana (in Turkish).
Altunkasa, M. F., and Yücel, M. (1998). “Fahrradrouten als element des nahverkehrssystems im oberen stadtentwicklungsgebiet North-West Adana [Bicycle routes as elements of recreational trail system in north-west urban development area of Adana].” TU International 42/43, 43–45 (in German).
Argys, L., and Mocan, N. (2000). “Bicycling and walking in Colorado: Economic impact and household survey results.” 〈http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/bikeped/bike-walk-study/technical-report〉.
Boulter, R. (2002). “Into the mainstream.” New Zealand Cycling Strategy Foundation Document Main Report, 〈http://archive.can.org.nz/research/CSNZ-Into_the_mainstream.pdf〉.
Bowker, J. M., and English, D. B. K. (2002). “Mountain biking at tsali: An assessment of users, preferences, conflicts, and management alternatives.” General Technical Rep. SRS-59, United States Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
Buis, J., and Wittink, R. (2000). “The economic significance of cycling.” The costs and benefits of cycling policy, VNG Uitgeverij, The Hague.
Dorrestyn, K. (1996). “Metropolitan Adelaide bicycle network.” Proc. Velo Australis International Bicycle Conference, Promaco Conventions, Canning Bridge, WA, 585–594.
Durham, W. M., and Gallagher, S. (2006). “Bozeman bicycle network plan.” Proc. 10th National Conf. on Transportation Planning for Small-Sized Communities, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
European Greenway Association (EGWA). (2000). The European greenways good practice guide: Examples of actions undertaken in cities and the periphery, Ibergráficas S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Glens Falls Transportation Council (GFTC). (2001). A/GFTC bicycle and pedestrian plan, Adirondack/Glens Falls Transportation Council, Glen Falls, NY.
Gold, S. M. (1980). Recreation planning and design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 322.
Harrison, J. (2002). Planning for more cycling: The york experience bucks the trend in planning for cycling: Principles, practice and solutions for urban planners, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, U.K.
Holmes, T. P., Healy, D. J., Boettger, K. M., Korths, N., and Schuett, M. A. (1994). Bicycle master plan for the Adirondack North Country region of New York State, Adirondack North Country Association, Saranac Lake, NY.
Hudson, M. (1982). Bicycle planning: Policy and practice, The Architectural Press Ltd, London.
Hughes, T. et al. (2004). “Cycle network and route planning guide.” Land Transport Safety Authority, Hamilton, New Zealand, 88.
International Mountain Bicycling Association (IMBA). (1995). “The economic and social benefits of off-road bicycle and pedestrian facilities.” National Bicycle and Pedestrian Clearing House Technical Assistance Series, 2, NBPC, Washington, DC.
Konya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (Konya Urban Council). (2001). Bisiklet ulaşımı geliştirme projeleri ve Konya bisiklet planı [Developing bicycle transportation project and Konya city bicycle plan], Yüksel Proje-Ulaşım-Art Ortaklığı Proje Raporu, Konya (in Turkish).
Lindsey, G. (1998). Public planning for private greenways: Evidence from the crooked Creek greenway survey, Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indianapolis.
Litman, T., Blair, R., and Demopoulos, B. (2003). Pedestrian and bicycle planning: A guide to best practice, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, Canada.
Mandıracıoğlu, A., Gövsa, F., and Hancı, İ. H. (1997). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de kentlerde otomobil bağımlılığı [Automobile dependence in urban areas in the world and Turkey], Ulaşım Trafik Kongresi, Ankara, Turkey, 102–109 (in Turkish).
Meenar, M. R. (2001). “Developing a GIS-based model and an interactive web site for a city-wide recreational bikeway network: An application for Buffalo.” User Conference Proc. (Redlands:ESRI), Temple Univ. Ambler College, New York.
Öncü, E., Çakan, C., and Candan, S. (2008). Trafik güvenliğinin ve kullanımının araştırılması için bisikletlere yönelik düzenlemeler: Konya bisiklet planı [Bicycle oriented arrangements for researching traffic safety and its usage], Ulaşım-Art Ltd. Şti., Konya, Turkey (in Turkish).
Pucher, J., and Dijkstra, L. (2003). “Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: Lessons from the Netherlands and Germany.” Am. J. Public Health, 93(9), 1509–1516.
Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K., and Turner, S. (2000). “A tale of three greenway trails: User perceptions related to quality of life.” Landscape Urban Plann., 49(3–4), 163–178.
U.S. Dept. of Transportation (USDOT). (2004). “National bicycling and walking study ten years status report.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Uslu, C., Altunkasa, M. F., Yılmaz, E., and Boyacıgil, O. (2004). “Adana kuzeydoğu kentsel gelişme alaninda bisikletli bağlanti olanaklarinin araştirilmasi [Research of the bicycle connection possibilities in the upper north-west urban development area].” Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi [Çukurova Univ., J. Agric. Fac.], 19(3), 101–108 (in Turkish).
Vogt, C., Nelson, C., Stynes, D., and Fridgen, J. (2000). “Michigander bike ride and its participants: A focus on midland county’s Pere Marquette rail-trail.” Dept. of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI.
Willis, K. G., Turner, R. K., and Bateman, I. J. (2001). Urban planning and management, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 138Issue 1March 2012
Pages: 62 - 69

History

Received: Jan 22, 2010
Accepted: Oct 25, 2010
Published online: Oct 29, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cengiz Uslu [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Çukurova Univ., Dept. of Landscape Architecture, 01330 Saricam, Adana, Turkey (corresponding author) E-mail: [email protected]
Faruk M. Altunkasa [email protected]
Professor, Çukurova Univ., Dept. of Landscape Architecture, 01330 Saricam, Adana, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Onur Boyacıgil [email protected]
Doctor, Çukurova Univ., Dept. of Landscape Architecture, 01330 Saricam, Adana, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Nurgül Konaklı [email protected]
Doctor, Çukurova Univ., Dept. of Landscape Architecture, 01330 Saricam, Adana, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Aylin Salıcı [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Mustafa Kemal Univ., Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Antakya, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share