Technical Papers
Oct 1, 2014

Risk-Based Planning in Transportation Asset Management: Critical Pitfalls

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 2

Abstract

The 2012 transportation bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, formalizes the application of risk management in transportation asset management decision making. The bill requires departments of transportation to have a formal risk management plan for the national highway system. When carried out successfully, risk planning can be a very powerful framework to effectively and efficiently manage transportation infrastructure. However, if there is lack of experience with and insight into risk planning, it can go wrong, leading to a counterproductive plan that contributes to ineffectiveness and inefficiencies in the organization and transportation system and to wasted resources. This paper reviews a broad spectrum of literature on risk methods and applications to identify and discuss some common pitfalls—failure to communicate, failure to monitor, proportionality, failure to involve knowledgeable individuals. It synthesizes the results for purposeful use in transportation asset management decision making. The literature review indicates that pitfalls are pervasive and usually familiar to the new generation of industries adopting the principles of risk in their management practices. Accordingly, the paper recommends that decision makers and analysts become more familiar with these pitfalls before embarking on risk implementation programs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Amendola, A. (2001). “Recent paradigms for risk-informed decision making.” Saf. Sci., 40(1–4), 17–30.
Anderson, R. (2011). Guidance paper: Risk appetite and tolerance, Institute of Risk Management, London.
Ayyub, B. M. (2003). Risk analysis in engineering and economics, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Boadi, R., and Amekudzi, A. (2014a). “Risk-based corridor asset management: Applying multi-attribute utility theory to manage multiple assets.”, Transportation Research Record, Washington, DC, 99–106.
Boadi, R., and Amekudzi, A. (2014b). “Risk-based management of ancillary transportation assets: Applying the delphi method to estimate the risk of failure.” Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Carter, D. A., Hirst, I. L., Maddison, T. E., and Porter, S. R. (2003). “Appropriate risk assessment methods for major accident establishments.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 81(1), 12–18.
Chess, C., Salomone, K. L., and Hance, B. J. (1995). “Improving risk communication in government: Research priorities.” Risk Anal., 15(2), 127–135.
Cox, L. A. (2007). “What’s wrong with hazard-ranking systems? An expository note.” Risk Anal., 29(7), 940–948.
Cox, L. A. (2008). “What is wrong with risk matrices.” Risk Anal., 28(2), 497–512.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012a). Risk-based asset management: Examining risk-based approaches to transportation asset management, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012b). Risk-based transportation asset management: Achieving policy objectives by managing risks, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012c). Risk-based transportation asset management: Building resilience into transportation assets, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012d). Risk-based transportation asset management: Evaluating threats, capitalizing on opportunities, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012e). Risk-based transportation asset management: Managing risks to networks, corridors, and critical structures, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012f). Transportation risk management: International practices for program development and project delivery, Washington, DC.
Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N. T., and Downs, J. S. (2011). Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide, Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Silver Spring, MD.
Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Keeney, R., and Derby, S. (1980). Approaches to acceptable risk: A critical guide, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Sub-7656, Eugene, OR.
Gharaibeh, N. G., and Shirazi, H. (2009). “Risk-based model for pricing highway infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 378–382.
Haimes, Y. Y. (2009). Risk modeling, assessment, and management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Hallowell, M. R., Molenaar, K. R., and Fortunato, B. R., III. (2013). “Enterprise risk management strategies for state departments of transportation.” J. Manage. Eng., 114–121.
Hrobjartsson, A., and Norup, M. (2003). “The use of placebo interventions in medical practice—A national questionnaire survey of Danish clinicians.” Eval. Health Prof., 26(2), 153–165.
Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The failure of risk management: Why it’s broken and how to fix it, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2009). ISO Guide 73-2009, Geneva.
Kaplan, S., and Garrick, B. (1981). “On the quantitative definition of risk.” Soc. Risk Anal., 1(1), 11–27.
Keeney, R. L., and Gregory, R. S. (2005). “Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives.” Oper. Res., 53(1), 1–11.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise of probability, Macmillan, London.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2009). “AASHTO Transportation asset management guide, Vol. II. A focus on implementation.”, Transportation Research Board’s, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Saydam, D., Frangopol, D. M., and Don, Y. (2013). “Assessment of risk using bridge element conditions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 252–265.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 141Issue 2February 2015

History

Received: Apr 4, 2014
Accepted: Sep 2, 2014
Published online: Oct 1, 2014
Published in print: Feb 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Mar 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Richard Sarpong Boadi [email protected]
Doctoral Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Adjo Amekudzi Kennedy, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332. E-mail: [email protected]
Jay Couture [email protected]
Partner Relations Manager, AgileAssets, 3001 Bee Caves Rd., Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share