Technical Papers
Aug 30, 2012

Disabled Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Inclusive Walking Facilities on Urban Streets

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

Current analytical methods to estimate the pedestrian level of service (PLOS) usually only consider a narrow range of pedestrians and may not be applicable for more diverse pedestrian populations with different characteristics. The aim of this study is to conceptualize the disabled pedestrian level of service (DPLOS) for different street hierarchies not previously addressed to ensure inclusive walking conditions. An analytical point system comparing existing pedestrian facilities to a standard is proposed to estimate the DPLOS. Although this practical model is only used for one case study in Singapore, the use of international standards would make this model universally applicable.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank to all of those who have supported this research for their useful comments during the completion. In particular, the staff members of the Transportation Laboratory of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia who helped us during the data collection process are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abdi-Daneshpour, Z. (2006). Urban environment adaptation for disabled people, University of Olum Behzisti va Tavanbakhshi, Tehran, Iran.
Access Board. (2002). “Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities.” U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers, Compliance Board (Access Board), Washington, DC.
Access Minneapolis. (2008). “Design guidelines for streets and sidewalks.” The Minneapolis Department of Public Works, Minneapolis, MN.
Asadi-Shekari, Z., and Zaly Shah, M. (2011). “Practical evaluation method for pedestrian level of service in urban streets.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Transport Research, Penang, Malaysia.
Ashland City Council. (1999). Street standard handbook, Department of Community Development, Ashland, OR.
Azizi, H., Momeni, M., and Taghinia, M. (2011). “Quality of life indices assessment for disabled and elderly people: Case study of Tehran.” Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning, Essen, Germany, 755–766.
Benz, G. P. (1986). Pedestrian time-space concept: A new approach to the planning and design of pedestrian facilities, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York.
Brown, A. L., Khattak, A. J., and Rodriguez, D. A. (2008). “Neighbourhood types, travel and body mass: A study of new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods in the US.” Urban Stud., 45(4), 963–988.
Buehler, R., and Pucher, J. (2011). “Sustainable transport in Freiburg: Lessons from Germany’s environmental capital.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp., 5(1), 43–70.
Bureau of the Census. (1997). “Disabilities affect one-fifth of all Americans: Proportion could increase in coming decades.” Census brief, Issue 97, Part 5, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington, DC.
Cao, X., Handy, S. L., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). “The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX.” Transportation, 33(1), 1–20.
Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT). (2007). “Charlotte’s urban street design guideline.” Charlotte, NC.
City of Aurora. (2007). “Aurora urban street standards in transit: Oriented developments and urban centers.” Aurora, CO.
City of Calgary. (2008). “Pedestrian policy and design report.” Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
City of Charles Sturt. (2009). “Engineering and open space development guidelines—Road and path design guidelines.” Charles Sturt, South Australia.
City of Tacoma. (2009). “Mobility master plan bicycle and pedestrian design guidelines.” Tacoma mobility master plan 1, Tacoma, WA.
City of Whittlesea. (2009). “City of Whittlesea development guidelines.” Victoria, Australia.
Clifton, K. J., and Dill, J. (2005). “Women’s travel behavior and land use: Will new styles of neighborhoods lead to more women walking?” Proc., Conf. on Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 89–99.
Coffin, A., and Morrall, J. (1995). “Walking speeds of elderly pedestrians at crosswalks.” Transportation Research Record 1487, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 63–67.
Daamen, W. (2004). Modelling passenger flows in public transport facilities, DUP Science, Delft, the Netherlands.
Davidson, K. (2006). “Designing a walkable suburban landscape: New urbanism and light rail as methodologies.” Master of Landscape Architecture, Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Delcan. (2008). “City of Ottawa road corridor planning and design guidelines.” Delcan, Planning Partnership, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dixon, L. (1996). “Bicycle and pedestrian level-of-service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems.” Transportation Research Record 1538, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–9.
Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. (2001). “Travel and the built environment: A synthesis.” Transportation Research Record 1780, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 87–114.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). (2009). “Quality/level of service.” Tallahassee, FL.
Fruin, J. J. (1971). “Pedestrian planning and design.” Metropolitan Associations of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, New York.
Gallin, N. (2001). “Pedestrian friendliness—Guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service.” Proc., Australia: Walking the 21st Century Conf., Perth, Australia.
Henson, C. (2000). “Levels of service for pedestrians.” ITE J., 70(9), 26–30.
Heramb, C., Acting Commissioner. (2007). “Street and site plan design standards.” Chicago Department of Transportation, Chicago.
Jensen, S. (2007). “Pedestrian and bicycle level of service on road way segments.” Transportation Research Record 2031, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 43–51.
Khisty, C. J. (1994). “Evaluation of pedestrian facilities: Beyond the level-of-service concept.” Transportation Research Record 1438, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 45–50.
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., and Laidet, L. (1997). “A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in San Francisco Bay Area.” Transp., 24(2), 125–158.
Lam, W. H. K., Morrall, J. F., and Ho, H. (1995). “Pedestrian flow characteristics in Hong Kong.” Transportation Research Record 1487, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56–62.
Landis, B., Vattikuti, V., Ottenberg, R., McLeod, D., and Guttenplan, M. (2001). “Modeling the roadside walking environment: A pedestrian level of service.” Transportation Research Record 1773, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 82–88.
Lautso, K., and Murole, P. (1974). “A study of pedestrian traffic in Helsinki: Methods and results.” Traffic Eng. Control, 15(9), 446–449.
Lee, J. Y. S., and Lam, W. H. K. (2003). “Levels of service for stairway in Hong Kong underground stations.” J. Transp. Eng., 129(2), 196–202.
Leverson Boodlal, P. E. (2001). “Accessible sidewalks and street crossings.” U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
LUTRAQ. (1993). “LUTRAQ: Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection.” The pedestrian environment, Vol. 4A, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Berkeley, CA.
Mateo-Babiano, I., and Ieda, H. (2007). “Street space sustainability in Asia: The role of the Asian pedestrian and street culture.” J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 7, 1915–1930.
Miller, J. S., Bigelow, J., and Garber, N. J. (2000). “Calibrating pedestrian level-of-service metrics with 3-D visualization.” Transportation Research Record 1705, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 9–15.
Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2010). Mn/DOT road design manual, St. Paul, MN.
Morrall, J. F., Ratnayake, L. L., and Seneviratne, P. N. (1991). “Comparison of central business district pedestrian characteristics in Canada and Srilanka.” Transportation Research Record 1294, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 57–61.
Mozer, D. (1994). “Calculating multi-mode levels-of-service.” International Bicycle Fund, Seattle, WA.
Narrabri Shire Council. (2001). “New South Wales development design specification: Geometric road design.” New South Wales, Australia.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (NCHRP). (2008). “Multimodal level of service analysis for urban streets.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Neighborhood Streets Project Stakeholders. (2000). “Neighborhood street design guidelines: An Oregon guide for reducing street widths.” Stakeholder Design Team, Oregon.
New York City Department of Transportation. (2009). “Street design manual.” New York.
Papworth Trust. (2011). “Disability in the United Kingdom: Facts and figures.” Bernard Sunley Centre, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23-3RG, UK.
Petritsch, T. A., et al. (2006). “Pedestrian level-of-service model for urban arterial facilities with sidewalks.” Transportation Research Record 1982, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 84–89.
Pima County. (2005). “Subdivision and development street standards.” Pima County, AZ.
Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. M. (1971). “Pedestrian travel demand.” Highway Research Record 355, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 37–53.
Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. M. (1975). Urban space for pedestrians: A report of the regional plan association, MIT Press, Cambridge, 127–129.
Sarkar, S. (1993). “Determination of service levels for pedestrians, with European example.” Transportation Research Record 1405, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 35–42.
Sarkar, S. (2002). “Qualitative evaluation of comfort needs in urban walkways in major activity centers.” Annual meeting 2003 (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Seneviratne, P. N., and Morrall, J. F. (1985a). “Level of service on pedestrian facilities.” Transp. Q., 39(1), 109–123.
Seneviratne, P. N., and Morrall, J. F. (1985b). “Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians.” Transp. Plann. Technol., 10(2), 147–159.
Shriver, K. (1997). “Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods.” Transportation Research Record 1578, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 64–75.
Singh, K., and Jain, P. K. (2011). “Methods of assessing pedestrian level of service.” J. Eng. Res. Stud., 2(1), 116–124.
Sisiopiku, V. P., and Akin, D. (2003). “Pedestrian behaviours at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data.” Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 6(4), 249–274.
Staplin, L., Lococo, K. H., McKnight, A. J., McKnight, A. S., and Odenheimer, G. L. (1998). Intersection negotiation problems of older drivers. Volume II: Background synthesis on age and intersection driving difficulties, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
Sutherland, A., and Morrish, G. (2006). Street design guidelines, A. Petersen, ed., Landcom, Parramatta, Australia.
Tan, D., Wang, W., Lu, J., and Bian, Y. (2007). “Research on methods of assessing pedestrian level of service for sidewalk.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 7(5), 74–79.
Tanaboriboon, Y., and Guyano, J. A. (1989). “Level-of-service standards for pedestrian facilities in Bangkok: A case study.” ITE J., 59(11), 39–41.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). “Highway capacity manual 2000.” Washington, DC.
Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure (Plg. and Engg.) Centre (UTTIPEC). (2009). Pedestrian design guidelines, Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi.
United States Access Board. (2002). “Guidelines for accessible public rights-of-way.” Washington, DC.
Vanderslice, E. (1998). Portland pedestrian design guide, Office of Transportation Engineering and Development, Portland, OR.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 181 - 192

History

Received: Feb 28, 2012
Accepted: Aug 23, 2012
Published online: Aug 30, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zohreh Asadi-Shekari [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate in Transportation Planning, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mehdi Moeinaddini [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate in Transportation Planning, Dept.of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. E-mail: [email protected]
Muhammad Zaly Shah [email protected]
Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share