Technical Papers
Aug 30, 2012

Empirical Study of Gap-Acceptance Behavior of Right-Turn-on-Red Drivers on Dual Right-Turn Lanes

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

Operational performance of right-turn-on-red (RTOR) at signalized intersections is a function of drivers’ gap-acceptance behavior. The objective of this study is to characterize gap-acceptance behavioral patterns of individual RTOR drivers turning from dual right-turn lanes. On the basis of direct field observation, binary logit models were developed, calibrated, and validated, and the attributes that have significant effects on gap-acceptance decisions were identified. The proposed model showed an improved capability of predicting gap-acceptance decisions as opposed to conventional, deterministic methods that may overrepresent aggressive drivers, whereas the deterministic method represents a reasonable trade-off between accuracy and ease of use for dual right-turn lanes. For RTOR drivers turning from a curb right-turn lane, the critical headway decreases on average as they are waiting for an acceptable gap. RTOR drivers turning from an inside right-turn lane did not demonstrate statistically significant evidence of increased impatience while waiting.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research has benefited from the discussions with Dr. Xuesong Zhou and Dr. Richard J. Porter with the University of Utah. The authors would also like to thank the three anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions. This research is supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 1137732.

References

Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R. (1987). Discrete choice analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Berry, C. J. (2009). An introduction to statistics, Univ. of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, 113–138.
Brilon, W., Koenig, R., and Troutbeck, R. J. (1999). “Useful estimation procedures for critical gaps.” Transp. Res., Part A, 33(3–4), 161–186.
Cassidy, M. J., Madanat, S. M., Wang, M., Yang, F., and Troutbeck, R. J. (1995). “Unsignalized intersection capacity and level of service: revisiting critical gap.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 16–23.
Chen, X., Qi, Y., and Li, D. (2012). “Estimating right turn on red capacity for dual right-turn lanes at signalized intersections.” Proc., 91st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Paper #12-0284, Washington, DC, and Transportation Research Record (in press).
Cooner, S. A., Ranft, S. E., Rathod, Y. K., Qi, Y., Yu, L., Wang, Y., and Chen, X. (2011). “Development of guidelines for triple left and dual right-turn lanes.”, Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, TX.
Daganzo, C. (1981). “Estimation of gap acceptance parameters within and across the population from direct roadside observation.” Transp. Res. Part B, 15(1), 1–15.
Huang, L., and Wu, J. (2004). “A study on cyclist behavior at signalized intersections.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 5(4), 293–299.
Liu, P., Wang, X., Lu, J., and Sokolow, G. (2007). “Headway acceptance characteristics of u-turning vehicles at unsignalized intersections.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 52–57.
Mahmassani, H., and Sheffi, Y. (1981). “Using gap sequences to estimate gap acceptance functions.” Transp. Res. Part B, 15(3), 143–148.
Miller, A. J. (1972). “Nine estimators of gap acceptance parameters.” Traffic Flow and Transportation, Proc., Int. Symp. on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, G. Newell, ed., American Elsevier Publishing, Berkeley, California.
Miller, A. J., and Pretty, R. L. (1968). “Overtaking on two-lane rural roads.” Proc. Aust. Rd. Res. Board, 4(1), 582–591.
Rosenthal, R. E. (2008). GAMS user’s guide, GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Board. (2010). Special report 209: Highway capacity manual, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Taylor, D., and Mahmassani, H. (1999). “Bicyclist and motorist gap acceptance behavior in mixed-traffic.” Proc., 78th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Tian, Z. et al. (1999). “Implementing the maximum likelihood methodology to measure a driver’s critical gap.” Transp. Res. Part A, 33(3–4), 187–197.
Troutbeck, R. J., and Brilon, W. (2005). Unsignalized intersection theory, revised monograph on traffic flow theory, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 173 - 180

History

Received: Feb 4, 2012
Accepted: Aug 23, 2012
Published online: Aug 30, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaoming Chen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant Professor, Dept. of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern Univ., 3100 Cleburne St., Houston, TX 77004 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Yi Qi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor and Chair, Dept. of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern Univ., 3100 Cleburne St., Houston, TX 77004. E-mail: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern Univ., 3100 Cleburne St., Houston, TX 77004. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share