Technical Papers
Apr 2, 2012

Appropriate Regression Model Types for Intersections in SafetyAnalyst

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 10

Abstract

Highway agencies in the United States have started implementing SafetyAnalyst, highway safety management software. Some agencies have been developing or considering developing safety performance functions (SPFs) using local data to maximize the benefits of the software. With multiple years of data on hand, several models are available for developing the SPFs, yet there is no reliable guide to selecting appropriate models. To this end, this study examined 11 models, including 8 panel and 3 cross-sectional models, to recommend appropriate model types for intersection SPFs of SafetyAnalyst. Data collected from 18,356 intersections in Virginia over the period 2003–2008 were used. A cross-sectional model with summed or averaged crash frequencies was found to severely underestimate a dispersion parameter that plays a critical role in the empirical Bayes method. Panel models with independent correlation and autoregressive Order 1 correlation and a pooled cross-sectional model were found to be appropriate across all 8 subtypes. Agencies unable to construct panel data and develop panel models can apply the pooled cross-sectional model, which does not require matching the same intersections across different years.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Linda Evans of the Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research for her great editorial help and the Virginia Department of Transportation for sponsoring the study.

References

AASHTO. (2011). “SafetyAnalyst overview.” Washington, DC, 〈www.safetyanalyst.org.〉 (Jul. 28, 2011).
Akaike, H. (1974). “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 19(6), 716–723.
Anastasopoulos, P. C., and Mannering., F. L. (2009). “A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 41(1), 153–159.
Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi., P. K. (1998). “Regression Analysis of Count Data.” Econometric Society Monograph, No. 30, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2009). SPF development guides: Developing SPFs with state or local highway agency data, U.S. DOT, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.safetyanalyst.org/spf_dev_guidelines/Developing%20SPFs%20with%20State%20or%20Local%20Highway%20Agency%20Data.pdf〉 (Jul. 28, 2011).
Fridstrom, L., Ifver, J., Ingebrigtsen, S., Kulmala, R., and Thomsen, L. K. (1995). “Measuring the contribution of randomness, exposure, weather, and daylight to the variation in road accident counts.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 27(1), 1–20.
Gardiner, J. C., Luo, Z., and Roman, L. A. (2009). “Fixed effects, random effects, and GEE: What are the differences?” Statist. Med., 28, 221–239.
Harwood, D. W., Torbic, D. J., Richard, K. R., and Meyer, M. M. (2010). “Safetyanalyst: software tools for safety management of specific highway sites.”, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Hu, F. B., Goldberg, J., Hedeker, D., Flay, B. R., and Pentz, M. A. (1998). “Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes.” Am. J. Epidemiol., 147(7), 694–703.
ITT Corp. (2009). “SafetyAnalyst user’s manual.”, U.S. DOT, Washington, DC.
Kweon, Y.-J., and Lim, I.-K (2010). “Appropriate regression model types for the empirical bayes method and safetyanalyst.” Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Liang, K.-Y., and Zeger, S. (1986). “Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.” Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22.
McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models, Chapman and Hall, London.
Pan, W. (2001). “Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations.” Biometrics, 57(1), 120–125.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). “Bayesian model selection in social research.” Sociol. Methodol., 25, 111–163.
SAS Institute Inc. (2004). “The GENMOD procedure.” Chapter 31, SAS/STAT 9.1 user’s guide, Cary, NC.
Virginia DOT. (2011). “About VDOT: Virginia’s highway system.” 〈www.virginiadot.org/about/vdot_hgwy_sys.asp.〉 (Jul. 28, 2011).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138Issue 10October 2012
Pages: 1250 - 1258

History

Received: Aug 3, 2011
Accepted: Mar 30, 2012
Published online: Apr 2, 2012
Published in print: Oct 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Young-Jun Kweon, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Research Scientist, Virginia DOT, Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, 530 Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
In-Kyu Lim, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Senior Highway Safety Engineer, Virginia DOT, Virginia Dept. of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad St., Richmond, VA 23219. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share