Cable Barriers and Traffic Safety on Rural Interstates
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 4
Abstract
High-tensioned cable barriers have been introduced in the United States as a median barrier option, primarily as a result of state agencies looking for a cost-effective means by which to mitigate or eliminate cross-median crashes. This paper studies the impact of cable barriers on crash frequency and severity in a way that can be utilized in the benefit-cost estimation for new cable barrier installations where other cost components have to be included, such as right-of-way and bridge structure widening. A before-and-after analysis with negative binomial and logistic regression was applied to data obtained from eight states to investigate the impact of cable barriers on the frequency and severity of crashes on a roadway segment. Three types of crashes were investigated for both the frequency and severity of crashes: single vehicle, multiple vehicle—same direction, and multiple vehicle—opposite direction (also called cross-median or crossover crashes). These three crash categories were considered separately with the assumption, confirmed with the results, that they are all affected by the presence of a median barrier. The result indicates that an installation of cable barriers, both low- and high-tensioned, eliminates 94% of multiple vehicle—opposite direction crashes. The before-and-after analysis showed that installing cable barriers results in an increase in reported single-vehicle crashes on wide, depressed medians by about 70%. In contrast, on narrow, depressed medians, the installation of a low-tensioned cable barrier essentially results in no change in safety. For multiple vehicle—same direction crashes, there is a weak, if any, effect on safety. Considering severity, the proportion of severe crashes decreases by more than 8% when adding a lane in each direction and installing a low-tensioned cable barrier on a wide, depressed median. The reduction in the proportion of severe crashes is less than 6% when the width is reduced in addition to the widening of the roadway and installation of a low-tensioned cable barrier. The narrower median is also the only median treatment that shows a considerable change in the proportion of crashes in response to an increase in average annual daily traffic. Finally, the effect of installing high-tensioned cable barriers on severity measured with the proportion of injury and fatal crashes is small if not negligible.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Joint Transportation Research Program administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration and the Indiana Department of Transportation, nor do the contents constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
We would like to express our gratitude to the following departments of transportation for providing us with the necessary data to include the respective state in this research: Indiana Department of Transportation, Colorado Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Transportation, Missouri Department of Transportation, New York Department of Transportation, Ohio Department of Transportation, Oregon Department of Transportation, and Washington Department of Transportation.
References
Albin, R. B., Bullard, D. L., and Menges, W. L. (2001). “Washington State cable median barrier.” Transportation Research Record 1743, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 71–79.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2006). Roadside design guide, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.
Chandler, B. (2007). “Eliminating cross-median fatalities: Statewide installation of median cable barrier in Missouri.” TR News No. 248, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 29–31.
Hadi, M. A., Aruldhas, J., Chow, L., and Wattleworth, J. (1995). “Estimating safety effects of cross-section design for various highway types using negative binomial regression.” Transportation Research Record 1500, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 169–177.
Hunter, W. W., Stewart, J. R., Eccles, K. A., Huang, H. F., Council, F. M., and Harkey, D. L. (2001). “Three-strand cable median barrier in North Carolina: In-service evaluation.” Transportation Research Record 1743, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 97–103.
Johnson, R. T. (1964). “Effectiveness of median barriers.” Highway Research Record 105, National Research Council, 99–112.
Knuiman, M. W., Council, F. M., and Reinfurt, D. W. (1993). “Association of median width and highway accident rates.” Transportation Research Record 1401, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 70–80.
LIMDEP, Version 7.0 [Computer software]. (1995). Bellport, NY, Econometric Software.
Marzougui, D., Mohan, P., Kan, C. D., and Opiela, K. (2007). “Performance evaluation of low-tension three-strand cable median barriers.” Transportation Research Record 2025, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–44.
McClanahan, D., Albin, R. B., and Milton, J. C. (2004). “Washington State cable median barrier in-service study.” Paper No. 04-2121. 83rd TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Miaou, S., Bligh, R. P., and Lord, D. (2005). “Developing guidelines for median barrier installation: Benefit-cost analysis with Texas data.” Transportation Research Record 1904, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2–19.
Noland, R. B., and Oh, L. (2004). “The effect of infrastructure and demographic change on traffic-related fatalities and crashes: A case study of Illinois county-level data.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 36(4), 525–532.
Outcalt, W. (2004). “Cable guardrail.” Rep. No. CDOT-DTD-R-2004-10, Colorado Dept. of Transportation Research Branch, 〈http://tig.transportation.org/sites/aashtotig/docs/Colorado%20cableguardrail%20Research%20(2004).pdf〉 (Mar, 1, 2007).
Ross, H. E., Jr., Sicking, D. L., Zimmer, R. A., and Michie, J. D. (1993). “Recommended procedures for the safety performance evaluation of highway features.” Report 350, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
SAS Institute. (2002). SAS System for Windows [Computer software]. Cary, NC.
Sheikh, N. M., Alberson, D. C., and Chatham, L. S. (2008). “The state-of-the-practice of cable barrier systems.” Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), 87th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Sposito, B., and Johnston, S. (1998). “Three-cable median barrier performance and costs in Oregon.” Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), 77th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Stein, W. (2005). “Brifen wire rope safety fence: Final report.” Iowa Dept. of Transportation, Ames, IA.
Tarko, A. P., Kanodia, M., and Zhou, Y. (2006). “Guidelines for roadway safety improvements.” JTRP Rep. SPR-40293. Indiana Dept. of Transportation, Indianapolis, IN.
Tarko, A. P., Villwock, N. M., and Blond, N. (2008). “The effect of median design on rural freeway safety—Flush medians with concrete barriers with depressed medians.” Transportation Research Record 2060, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 29–37.
Villwock, N., Blond, N., and Tarko, A. (2008.) “Risk assessment of various median treatments of rural interstates, final report.” SPR-2950, Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
Wang, J., Hughes, W. E., and Stewart, R. (1998). “Safety effects of cross-section design for rural four-lane, non-freeway highways.” Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-071, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 4 • April 2011
Pages: 248 - 259
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 12, 2009
Accepted: Aug 2, 2010
Published online: Aug 31, 2010
Published in print: Apr 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.