Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Flexible Rehabilitation Treatments Using Different Performance Criteria
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 10
Abstract
At a certain point in the life of a flexible pavement, rehabilitation is required to improve pavement condition and to defer reconstruction. Pavement managers seek the best rehabilitation treatment on the basis of cost effectiveness. Using 1994–2002 data from a wet-freeze mid-Western state in the United States, this paper analyzes the cost effectiveness of four flexible pavement rehabilitation treatments: functional hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlay, structural HMA overlay, resurfacing (partial 3R standards), and mill full-depth and asphaltic concrete overlay. The performance indicator used is the international roughness index and treatment effectiveness is measured in terms of performance jump (short-term), and service life and increase in pavement performance (long-term). The treatment cost is the equivalent uniform annual cost per lane-km incurred by the agency and user; and cost effectiveness is the ratio of effectiveness to cost. The study estimated treatment effectiveness under various combinations of traffic loading and climatic condition, and initial pavement condition. The results suggest that in the short-term, HMA structural overlay is the most effective treatment. For the long-term, the results are equivocal: HMA structural overlay is most effective from the perspective of average performance over the treatment life; resurfacing (partial 3R standards) is the most effective from the perspective of treatment service life. With regard to cost effectiveness, however, the results were consistent: for all three measures of treatment effectiveness, mill full-depth and asphaltic concrete overlay unequivocally appears to be the most cost effective treatment. Finally, the paper recommends that cost effectiveness analysis should be accompanied by a candid deliberation of project constraints, the local environment, and agency practices.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Data for this work was supplied by the Indiana Department of Transportation. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration and the Indiana Department of Transportation, nor do the contents constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). “Consumer price indexes (CPI).” U.S. Department of Labor, ⟨http://www.bls.gov/CPI/⟩ (Nov. 15, 2008).
Chong, G. J. (1990). “Rut and seal cracks in flexible pavements—A cost-effective preventive maintenance procedure.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1268, 8–16.
FHwA. (1998). “Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design—In search of better investment decisions.” Rep. No. FHWA-SA-98–079, Federal Highway Administration, DOT, Washington, D.C.
Geoffroy, D. N. (1996). “Cost-effective preventive pavement maintenance.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis of Highway Practice 223, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Gulen, S., Nagle, J., Weaver, J., and Gallivan, V. (2000). “Determination of practical ESAL per truck values on Indiana roads.” Tech. Rep. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/23, Indianapolis, Ind.
Haas, R., Tighe, S. L., and Falls, L. C. (2006). “Determining return on long-life pavement investments.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1974, 10–17.
Hall, K. T., Correa, C. E., Carpenter, S. H., and Elliott, R. P. (2001). “NCHRP Project C1-38.” Final Rep. Rehabilitation Strategies for Highway Pavements, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Hand, A. J., Sebaaly, P. E., and Epps, J. A. (1999). “Development of performance models based on Department of Transportation Pavement Management System Data.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1684, 215–222.
Hicks, G. R., Dunn, K., and Moulthrop, J. S. (1997). “Framework for selecting effective preventive maintenance treatments for flexible pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1597, 1–10.
Labi, S., Lamptey, G., Konduri, S., and Sinha, K. (2005). “Analysis of long-term effectiveness of thin hot mix asphaltic concrete overlay treatments.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1940, 3–12.
Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2005). “Life-cycle evaluation of flexible pavement preventive maintenance.” J. Transp. Eng., 131(10), 744–751.
Lamptey, G., Ahmad, M., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2004). “Life cycle cost analysis for INDOT pavement design procedures.” Technical Rep. No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/28, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind.
Li, N., Huot, M., and Haas, R. (1997). “Cost-effectiveness-based priority programming of standardized pavement maintenance.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1592, 8–16.
Livneh, M. (1996). “Deterioration modeling for un-laid and overlaid pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1524, 177–193.
Mamlouk, M. S., and Zaniewski, J. P. (1998). Pavement preventive maintenance: Description, effectiveness and treatments in flexible pavement rehabilitation and maintenance, P. S. Kandhal and M. Stroup-Gardner, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Maurer, G., Bemanian, S., and Polish, P. (2007). “Alternative strategies for rehabilitation of low-volume roads in Nevada.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1989, 309–320.
Mohamed, D., McCarthy, P., and Sinha, K. C. (1997). “Relationship between pavement performance and routine maintenance: Mixed logit approach.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1597, 16–21.
Morian, D. A., Coleman, L., Frith, D. J., Stoffels, S. M., and Dawood, D. (2003). “Pennsylvania SPS-6 performance at 10 years: Evaluation of concrete pavement rehabilitation strategies.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1823, 28–38.
Morian, D. A., Zhao, Y., Arellano, J., and Hall, D. E. (2005). “Asphalt pavement rehabilitation treatment: Analysis of 20 years of performance.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1905, 36–43.
O’Brien, L. G. (1989). “Evolution and benefits of preventive maintenance strategies.”National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis of Highway Practice 153, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Peshkin, D. G., Hoerner, T. E., Zimmerman K. A. (2004). “Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. No. 523, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Peterson, D. E. (1985). “Life-cycle cost analysis of pavements.” National Cooperative Highway Res. Program Synthesis of Highway Practice 122, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Rajagopal, A. S., and George, K. P. (1990). “Pavement maintenance effectiveness.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1276, 62–68.
Sebaaly, P. E., Lani, S., Hand, A., Epps, J., and Bosch, C. (1995). “Performance models for flexible pavement maintenance treatments.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1508, 9–21.
Shober, S. F., and Friedrichs, D. A. (1999). “Maintenance and rehabilitation committee.” Final Rep. Prepared for Pavement Preservation Strategy, Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), Madison, Wis.
Sinha, K. C., and Labi, S. (2007). “Transportation decision making.” Principles of project evaluation and programming, Wiley, New Jersey.
Smith, R., Freeman, T., and Pendleton, O. (1993). “Pavement maintenance effectiveness.” Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Wei, C., and Tighe, S. (2004). “Development of preventive maintenance decision trees based on cost-effectiveness analysis—An Ontario case study.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1866, 9–19.
Zimmerman, K. A., and Peshkin, D. G. (2003). “Integrating preventive maintenance and pavement management practices.” Proc., 2003 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symp., Ames, Iowa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 24, 2008
Accepted: Feb 23, 2009
Published online: Mar 5, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.