Abstract

High-accuracy and homogeneously distributed dense terrestrial gravity observations are essential data for detailed analysis of the Earth gravity field as well as for precise modeling of the geoid, which is a natural datum for point heights in geodetic and surveying applications. Precise modeling of the regional geoid and the related quality assessments of the terrestrial data are still substantial issues in many countries. The terrestrial gravity measurements in Turkey have been carried out by different institutions; therefore, the collected data have different qualities and standards. For this reason, detailed analysis of the archival data quality and datum consistency is required for regional geoid modeling using these data. In this article, the accuracy of a gridded gravity anomaly dataset was validated using pointwise gravity values with known accuracy in a limited area in northwest Turkey. Hence, this study aimed to test the contribution of the regridded gravity anomalies in combination with two different gravity datasets to determine a precise geoid model for the region. The assessments showed that the accuracy of the grid gravity anomaly dataset was approximately 5.0 mGal in the study area. Although the pointwise data used as control data in this study have high accuracy (∼3.0 mGal), they exhibit nonhomogeneous and striped distribution in the area, which is not appropriate for geoid modeling purposes. The calculations using regridded data with a combination of the two datasets resulted in a geoid model accuracy of 9.4 cm. The calculated accuracy was compared with the official Turkey Geoid model (TG) and Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) in its full spectrum, and the improvements were reported.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out as part of the research project that was supported by TÜBİTAK (the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) with Contract No. 114Y581. The graphical representations in the article have been prepared using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) and Surfer of the Golden Software.

References

Ågren, J., and L. E. Sjöberg. 2014. “Investigation of gravity data requirements for a 5 mm-quasigeoid model over Sweden.” In Gravity, geoid and height systems, edited by U. Marti, 143–150. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Amos, M. J. 2007. “Quasi-geoid modelling in New Zealand to unify multiple local vertical datums.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Spatial Sciences, Curtin Univ. of Technology.
Andersen, O. B., L. Stenseng, P. Knudsen, and M. Jain. 2013. “Arctic marine gravity and bathymetry from 3 years of Cryosat-2 SAR altimetry (DTU13 Gravity).” In Abstract Proc., AGU Fall Meeting 2013. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Andritsanos, V. D., A. Fotiou, E. Paschalaki, C. Pikridas, D. Rossikopoulos, and I. N. Tziavos. 2000. “Local geoid computation and evaluation.” Phys. Chem. Earth Part A 25 (1): 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1895(00)00011-9.
Ateş, A., P. Kearey, and S. Tufan. 1999. “New gravity and magnetic anomaly maps of Turkey.” Geophys. J. Int. 136 (2): 499–502.
Ayhan, M. E., and O. Alp. 1988. “Serbest hava anomali kestirim yöntemleri ve yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması [Prediction methods of free-air gravity anomalies and their comparisons].” [In Turkish.] Harita Dergisi 109: 22–44.
Bajracharya, S. 2003. “Terrain effects on geoid determination.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Univ. of Calgary.
Barthelmes, F. 2013. Definition of functionals of the geopotential and their calculation from spherical harmonic models: Theory and formulas used by the calculation service of the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM). Potsdam, Germany: Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam.
Demir, C. 2005. “Düşey Datumun Belirlenmesi ve Uygulamada Kullanımı [Vertical datum determination and use in practical applications].” [In Turkish.] In Proc., Turkey National Geodesy Commission Annual Meeting: Geoid and Vertical Datum. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish National Geodesy Commission.
Demir, C., and A. Cingöz. 2002. “Turkey national vertical control (levelling) network (TNVCN-99).” In Proc., Turkey National Geodesy Commission Annual Meeting: Tectonics and Geodetic Networks. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish National Geodesy Commission.
Demir, C., A. Kılıçoğlu, and O. Fırat. 2006. “Türkiye Temel Gravite Ağı-1999 (TTGA-99) [Turkey fundamental gravity network-1999 (TFGN-99)].” [In Turkish.] Harita Dergisi 136: 49–63.
DTU (Technical University of Denmark). 2019. “DTU13 data download protocol.” Accessed January 14, 2019. ftp://ftp.space.dtu.dk/pub/DTU13.
Erol, B. 2007. “Investigations on local geoids for geodetic applications.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ.
Farahani, H. H., R. Klees, and C. Slobbe. 2017. “Data requirements for a 5-mm quasi-geoid in the Netherlands.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 61 (4): 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-0171-7.
Farr, T. G., et al. 2007. “The shuttle radar topography mission.” Rev. Geophys. 45 (2): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183.
Featherstone, W. E., and M. C. Dentith. 1997. “A geodetic approach to gravity reduction for geophysics.” Comput. Geosci. 23 (10): 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00092-7.
Featherstone, W. E., M. S. Filmer, S. J. Claessens, M. Khun, C. Hirt, and J. F. Kirby. 2012. “Regional geoid-model-based datums-some Astralian perspectives.” J. Geodetic Sci. 2 (4): 370–376. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-012-0006-6.
Foroughi, I., P. Vaníček, R. W. Kingdon, M. Goli, M. Sheng, Y. Afrasteh, and P. Novák. 2019. “Sub-centimeter geoid.” J. Geod. 93 (6): 849–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1208-1.
Fotopoulos, G. 2003. “An analysis on the optimal combination of geoid, orthometric and ellipsoidal height data.” Accessed August 25, 2019. https://www.ucalgary.ca/engo_webdocs/MGS/03.20185.GFotopoulos.pdf.
Gareau, R. M. 1986. History of precise levelling in Canada and the North American vertical datum readjustment. Calgary, Canada: Univ. of Calgary.
Gruber, T., and M. Willberg. 2019. “Signal and error assessment of GOCE-based high resolution gravity field models.” In Proc., 27th IUGG General Assembly. Potsdam, Germany: International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics.
Heiskanen, W. A., and H. Moritz. 1967. Physical geodesy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Hirt, C., T. Gruber, and W. E. Featherstone. 2011. “Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights.” J. Geod. 85: 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0482-y.
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., and H. Moritz. 2005. Physical geodesy. Berlin: Springer.
Hong, C. K., J. H. Kwon, B. M. Lee, J. Lee, Y. S. Choi, and S. B. Lee. 2009. “Effects of gravity data quality and spacing on the accuracy of the geoid in South Korea.” Earth Planets Space 61: 927–932. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353204.
Huang, J., and C. Kotsakis. 2009. External quality evaluation reports of EGM08. Milano, Italy: International Service for the Geoid.
Huang, J., M. Reguzzoni, and T. Gruber. 2015. Assessment of GOCE geopotential models. Milano, Italy: International Service for the Geoid.
ICGEM (International Center for Global Earth Models). 2018. “International center for global earth models: GFZ Potsdam Germany.” Accessed October 31, 2018. http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/ICGEM/.
Işık, M. S. 2016. “An investigation on the contribution of GOCE satellite mission to regional geoid modeling in Turkey.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ.
Işık, M. S., S. Erol, and B. Erol. 2017. “Analysis on the quality of high-resolution global digital terrain models (DTM) using GPS/leveling data in Turkey.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on GIS Applications in Geography and Geosciences (ISGG-2017), edited by S. Özden, C. Akbulak, R. C. Erenoğlu, O. Karaca, F. Saris, and M. Avcıoğlu, 1–206. Çanakkale, Turkey: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ.
Kearsley, A. H. W. 1986. “Data requirements for determining precise relative geoid heights from Gravimetry.” J. Geophys. Res. 91 (B9): 9193–9201. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB09p09193.
Knudsen, P., O. Andersen, and N. Maximenko. 2016. “The updated geodetic mean dynamic topography model: DTU15MDT.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems 2016. Thessaloniki, Greece: International Gravity Field Service.
Kotsakis, C., K. Katsambalos, and D. Ampatzidis. 2012. “Estimation of the zero-height geopotential level WoLVD in a local vertical datum from inversion of co-located GPS, leveling and geoid heights: A case study in the Hellenic islands.” J. Geod. 86 (6): 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0530-7.
NGS (National Geodetic Survey). 1998. “National geodetic survey national height modernization study: Report to congress, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service.” Accessed October 9, 2019. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/heightmod/1998heightmodstudy.pdf.
Novák, P. 2000. Evaluation of gravity data for the Stokes–Helmert solution to the geodetic boundary-value problem. Fredericton, Canada: Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, Univ. of New Brunswick.
Oliver, M. A., and R. Webster. 2015. Basic steps in geostatistics: The Variogram and Kriging. New York: Springer.
Oršulić, O. B., D. Markovinović, M. Varga, and T. Bašić. 2019. “The impact of terrestrial gravity data density on geoid accuracy: Case study Bilogora in Croatia.” Surv. Rev. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1562747.
Pavlis, N. K., S. A. Holmes, S. C. Kenyon, and J. K. Factor. 2008. “An Earth Gravitational Model to degree 2160: EGM2008.” In Proc., Abstracts of European Geoscience Union (EGU) General Assembly Conf. Munich, Germany: European Geosciences Union.
Pavlis, N. K., S. A. Holmes, S. C. Kenyon, and J. K. Factor. 2012. “The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008).” J. Geophys. Res. 117 (B4): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008916.
Reguzzoni, M., and G. Sona. 2016. “International service for the geoid (ISG).” In The geodesists handbook 2016, edited by H. Drewes, F. Kuglitsch, J. Adám, and S. Ròzsa, 1191–1192. Berlin: Springer.
Sánchez, L., R. Čunderlík, N. Dayoub, K. Mikula, Z. Minarechová, Z. Šíma, V. Vatrt, and M. Vojtíšková. 2016. “A conventional value for the geoid reference potential W0.” J. Geod. 90 (9): 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x.
Sansò, F., and M. G. Sideris. 2013. Geoid determination: Theory and methods. Berlin: Springer.
Shields, R. S., and C. M. Gallagher. 2012. “Height modernization in the United States: Implementing a vertical datum referenced to a gravimetric geoid model.” Accessed October 30, 2018. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/heightmod/TS04B_shields_gallagher_5659.pdf.
Simav, M., A. Direnç, A. Türkezer, A. İ. Kurt, and M. Kurt. 2012. “Evaluations on Turkey terrestrial gravity database.” In Proc., Turkey National Geodesy Commission Annual Meeting. Ankara, Turkey: Turkey National Geodesy Commission.
Simav, M., H. Yıldız, and A. Cingöz. 2015. “Türkiye Yükseklik Sistemi Modernizasyonu ve Gravite Altyapısının Geliştirilmesi Projesi [Turkey Height System Modernization and Improving Gravity Infrastructure Project].” [In Turkish.] Accessed October 7, 2018. http://www.hkmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/80423445937547c_ek.pdf.
Singh, S. K. 2018. “Towards the modernization of Indian Vertical Datum.” Accessed October 7, 2019. https://fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2018/papers/ts06e/TS06E_singh_9497.pdf.
Smith, D. A. 1998. There is no such thing as ‘The’ EGM96 geoid: Subtle points on the use of a global geopotential model. Milan, Italy: International Geoid Service.
SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission). 2018. “Shuttle radar topography mission: NASA Jet propulsion laboratory website.” Accessed March 24, 2020. https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/.
Torge, W. 2001. Geodesy. Berlin: Springer.
Tscherning, C. C. 2013. “Geoid determination by 3D least-squares collocation.” In Geoid determination: Theory and methods, edited by F. Sansò and M. G. Sideris, 311–336. Berlin: Springer.
Tscherning, C. C., and R. H. Rapp. 1974. Closed covariance expressions for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations, and deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree variance models. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Tziavos, I. N., and M. G. Sideris. 2013. “Topographic reductions in gravity and geoid modeling.” In Geoid determination: Theory and methods, edited by F. Sansò and M. G. Sideris, 337–400. Berlin: Springer.
Varga, M., O. Bjelotomič, and T. Bašić. 2016. “Initial considerations on modernization of the crotian height reference system.” Accessed 30 October 2018. http://www.geof.unizg.hr/pluginfile.php/7437/mod_book/chapter/173/TS2_4.pdf.
Vermeer, M. 2018. Physical geodesy lecture notes. Espoo, Finland: Aalto Univ.
Véronneau, M., R. Duval, and J. Huang. 2006. “A gravimetric geoid model as a vertical datum in Canada.” Geomatica 60 (2): 165–172.
Véronneau, M., and J. Huang. 2016. “The Canadian geodetic vertical datum of 2013 (CGVD2013).” Geomatica 70 (1): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.5623/cig2016-101.
Watson, D. F. 1992. Contouring: A guide to the analysis and display of spatial data. New York: Pergamon Press.
Yıldız, H. 2012. “Yükseklik Modernizasyonu Yaklaşımı: Türkiye İçin Bir İnceleme [Height Modernization Approach: An Evaluation for Turkey].” [In Turkish.] Harita Dergisi 147: 1–12.
Yılmaz, N., and L. Çakır. 2016. “A research of consistencies and progresses of geoid models in Turkey.” Arabian J. Geosci. 9 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2098-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 146Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: Feb 9, 2019
Accepted: Dec 18, 2019
Published online: Apr 3, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 3, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-788X. Email: [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-4451. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-8267. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share