Abstract

International standards establish strict criteria for the measurement of railway track geometric parameters by track inspection trolleys. In the case of the rails’ internal geometry, the values of some parameters (such as track gauge and cant) must be determined directly by a set of high-resolution and high-precision sensors. To ensure the quality of the data (or detect any mechanical misalignment), prior to the observation program the instrument needs to undergo a simple but rigorous check, a procedure the authors argue the regulations fail to properly define. A simple but rigorous routine validation procedure is put forward with which to check the correct functioning of the measurement process by providing estimates for the expected error and variance of the measured parameters. A methodological proposal for in-field observations and error analysis is described in depth. A practical application is described as applied to a track section of the Madrid–Extremadura–Portuguese Border (Spain) high-speed line, which is currently under construction, analyzing the experimental data for the parameters track gauge and cant.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data models and code generated or used during the study are available on request from the corresponding author:
Proposed procedure programmed in Python;
Measurement reference data (RD); and
Data acquired by the trolley in stop-and-go and kinematic modes, forward and backward (DF and DB).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Junta de Extremadura/FEDER funds Spain (Projects GR18108 and GR18023) through financing granted to the research group RNM020, INNOVA Design, Sustainability and Added Value, and by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) for the Project MTM2017-83568-P.

References

Berawi, A. R. B., R. Delgado, R. Calçada, and C. Vale. 2010. “Evaluating track geometrical quality through different methodologies.” Int. J. Technol. 1 (1): 38–47.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Railway applications. Track. Track geometry quality. Part 2: Measuring systems. Track recording vehicles. EN 13848-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2008a. Railway applications. Track. Track geometry quality. Part 3: Measuring systems. Track construction and maintenance machines. EN 13848-3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2008b. Railway applications. Track. Track geometry quality. Part 5: Geometric quality levels. EN 13848-5. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2009. Railway applications. Track. Track geometry quality. Part 3: Measuring systems—Track construction and maintenance machines. EN 13848-3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2011. Railway applications. Track: Track geometry quality. Part 4: Measuring systems: Manual and lightweight devices. EN 13848-4. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, Q., X. Niu, Q. Zhang, and Y. Cheng. 2015. “Railway track irregularity measuring by GNSS/INS integration.” J. Inst. Navig. 62 (1): 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.78.
Chen, Q., X. Niu, L. Zuo, T. Zhang, F. Xiao, Y. Liu, and J. Liu. 2018. “A railway track geometry measuring trolley system based on aided INS.” Sensors 18 (2): 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020538.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2016. Railroad track inspection interface demonstration. Washington, DC: FRA.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2017. Track and rail and infraestructure integrity compliance manual, Volume II. Track safety standards classes 1 through 5. Washington, DC: FRA.
Gikas, V., and J. Stratakos. 2012. “A novel geodetic engineering method for accurate and automated road/railway centerline geometry extraction based on the bearing diagram and fractal behavior.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13 (1): 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2163186.
Huber, P. J. 2011. Robust statistics. An international encyclopedia of statistical science. Berlin: Springer.
ISO. 2001. Optics and optical instruments—Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments. Part II: Levels. ISO 17123-2. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2015. Quality management systems—Requirements. ISO 9001. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2018. Optics and optical instruments—Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments. Part V: Total stations. ISO 17123-5. Geneva: ISO.
Jaynes, E. 2003. Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jianmin, Z. 2007. “Modeling and optimizing track maintenance and renewal.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of Birmingham.
Liu, C., N. Li, H. Wu, and X. Meng. 2013. “Detection of high-speed railway subsidence and geometry irregularity using terrestrial laser scanning.” J. Surv. Eng. 140 (3): 04014009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000131.
Mendenhall, W., R. J. Beaver, and B. M. Beaver. 2009. Introduction to probability and statistics. 15th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Montgomery, D. C., and G. C. Runger. 2007. Applied statistics and probability for engineers. New York: Wiley.
Rabiain, A., A. Kealy, and M. Morelande. 2013. “Tightly coupled MEMS based INS/GNSS performance evaluation during extended GNSS outages.” J. Appl. Geodesy 7 (4): 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2013-0056.
Ramachandran, K. M., and C. Tsokos. 2014. Mathematical statistics with applications in R. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Ramos, A., and P. Fonseca. 2012. “A Bayesian model to assess rail track geometry degradation through its life-cycle.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 36 (1): 1–8.
Rousseeuw, P. J., and C. Croux. 1993. “Alternatives to the median absolute deviation.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88 (424): 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476408.
Sadeghi, J., and H. Askarinejad. 2007. “Influences of track structure, geometry and traffic parameters on railway deterioration.” Int. J. Eng. 20 (3): 292–300.
Sadeghi, J., and H. Askarinejad. 2009. “An investigation into the effects of track structural conditions on railway track geometry deviations.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 223 (4): 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT266.
Sadeghi, J., and H. Askarinejad. 2010. “Development of improved railway track degradation models.” Int. J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (6): 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470801902436.
Sato, Y. 1995. “Japanese studies on deterioration of ballasted track.” Supplement, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 24 (s1): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119508969625.
Talukdar, K., U. Arulmozhi, K. Prabhakar, and Satyanarayan. 2006. Project presentation improvement of TGI value by computer analysis. Mumbai, India: Ministry of Railways, Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering.
Wolde, M., and A. Ghobbar. 2013. “Optimizing inspection intervals-reliability and availability in terms of a cost model: A case study on railway carriers.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 114 (Jun): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.12.013.
Zhang, J., H. Murray, and L. Ferreira. 1999. “An integrated model for track degradation prediction.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 8th World Conf. on Transport Research, World Transport Research, 527–539. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Pergamon.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 146Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: Jun 23, 2019
Accepted: Dec 13, 2019
Published online: Mar 23, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 23, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Graphic Expression, Univ. of Extremadura, Centro Universitario de Mérida, Avda. Santa Teresa de Jornet, 38. Mérida 06800, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0392-2994. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Extremadura, Centro Universitario de Mérida, Avda. Santa Teresa de Jornet, 38. Mérida 06800, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1549-7964. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Extremadura, Facultad de Ciencias, Avda. de Elvas, s/n. Badajoz 06006, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-7699. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share