Revealing Bluff-Body Aerodynamics on Low-Rise Buildings under Tornadic Winds Using Numerical Laboratory Tornado Simulator
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 3
Abstract
Tornadoes result in death and property loss in communities around the world. To quantify the actions of tornadoes on civil structures, researchers have built physical laboratory tornado simulators to simulate tornadoes in the lab environment and tested building models in the simulated tornadic wind field, which is similar to wind tunnel testing when quantifying the wind effects induced by straight-line winds. Unfortunately, physical tornado simulators are much less common than straight-line wind tunnels, leading to the lack of research on bluff-body aerodynamics on civil structures under tornadic winds. Considering that it is expensive to conduct experimental testing in physical tornado simulators, numerical models of physical tornado simulator has been developed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. However, they have not been validated at the level of pressure distribution on the structural surface of the testing model. In this study, the numerical model developed for the large-scale tornado simulator of the Missouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T), which is based on the numerical simulation of the entire process of the physical testing in tornado simulator, will be validated by the measured data on the building model tested in the physical tornado simulator. Then, through the validated numerical simulation model, the bluff-body aerodynamics of buildings under tornadic winds will be revealed. To be specific, CFD simulation is first applied to model the entire process of experimental testing of a low-rise building model in the physical tornado simulator. Then, the obtained results are compared with laboratory-measured data to evaluate the effects of the building model on the wind field and the surface pressure on the building model. Then, the bluff-body aerodynamics on low-rise buildings under tornadic winds will be revealed based on the data obtained from numerical simulations using the relationship between streamline pattern change and velocity magnitude change (mass continuity theorem) and using the relationship between the velocity magnitude change and the pressure change (Bernoulli’s theorem), as well as the flow separation and vortex shedding.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors greatly appreciate the financial support from the VORTEX-SE Program within the NOAA/OAR Office of Weather and Air Quality under Grant No. NA20OAR4590452 and the financial support from National Science Foundation, through the project, “Damage and Instability Detection of Civil Large-scale Space Structures under Operational and Multi-hazard Environments” (Award No. 1455709), and two other projects (Nos. 1940192 and 2044013).
References
Changnon, S. A. 2009. “Tornado losses in the United States.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 10 (4): 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2009)10:4(145).
Duthinh, D., J. A. Main, M. L. Gierson, and B. M. Phillips. 2018. “Analysis of wind pressure data on components and cladding of low-rise buildings.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (1): 04017032. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000936.
Fluent Manual. 2017a. Large eddy simulation. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
Fluent Manual. 2017b. Sliding mesh technique. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
Gierson, M. L., B. M. Phillips, D. Duthinh, and B. M. Ayyub. 2017. “Wind-pressure coefficients on low-rise building enclosures using modern wind-tunnel data and Voronoi diagrams.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (4): 04017010. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000915.
Haan, F. L., V. K. Balaramudu, and P. P. Sarkar. 2010. “Tornado-induced wind loads on a low-rise building.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (1): 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000093.
Haan, F. L., P. P. Sarkar, and W. A. Gallus. 2008. “Design, construction and performance of a large tornado simulator for wind engineering applications.” Eng. Struct. 30 (4): 1146–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.010.
Kuai, L., F. L. Haan, W. A. Gallus, and P. P. Sarkar. 2008. “CFD simulations of the flow field of a laboratory-simulated tornado for parameter sensitivity studies and comparison with field measurements.” Wind Struct. 11 (2): 75–96. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2008.11.2.075.
Kuligowski, E. D., F. T. Lombardo, L. T. Phan, M. L. Levitan, and D. P. Jorgensen. 2014. “Final report, national institute of standards and technology technical investigation of the May 22, 2011, Tornado in Joplin, Missouri.” Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 22 (May): 1–494. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.NCSTAR.3.
Liu, Z., and T. Ishihara. 2015. “A study of tornado induced mean aerodynamic forces on a gable-roofed building by the large eddy simulations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 146 (Nov): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.08.002.
Mishra, A. R., D. L. James, and C. W. Letchford. 2008. “Physical simulation of a single-celled tornado-like vortex, part B: Wind loading on a cubical model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (8): 1258–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.027.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2019. “The national severe storms laboratory of national oceanic and atmospheric.” Accessed November 21, 2019. http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/tornadoes/.
Rajasekharan, S. G., M. Matsui, and Y. Tamura. 2013. “Characteristics of internal pressures and net local roof wind forces on a building exposed to a tornado-like vortex.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 112 (Jan): 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.11.005.
Refan, M., and H. Hangan. 2016. “Characterization of tornado-like flow fields in a new model scale wind testing chamber.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 151 (Apr): 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.02.002.
Simmons, K. M., D. Sutter, and R. Pielke. 2013. “Normalized tornado damage in the United States: 1950–2011.” Environ. Hazards 12 (2): 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.738642.
Snyder, J. C., and H. B. Bluestein. 2014. “Some considerations for the use of high-resolution mobile radar data in tornado intensity determination.” Weather Forecasting 29 (4): 799–827. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00026.1.
Tominaga, Y., S. Akabayashi, T. Kitahara, and Y. Arinami. 2015. “Air flow around isolated gable-roof buildings with different roof pitches: Wind tunnel experiments and CFD simulations.” Build. Environ. 84 (Jan): 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.012.
Yuan, F., G. Yan, R. Honerkamp, K. M. Isaac, M. Zhao, and X. Mao. 2019. “Numerical simulation of laboratory tornado simulator that can produce translating tornado-like wind flow.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 190 (Jul): 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.05.001.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148 • Issue 3 • March 2022
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 3, 2021
Accepted: Oct 27, 2021
Published online: Dec 24, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 24, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Pengying Jia, Mo Chen, Hanxiao Jia, Xin Tan, Junxia Ran, Kaiyue Wu, Jiacun Wu, Junyu Chen, Xuexia Pang, Xuechen Li, Na Zhao, Ozone Concentration Measurement of an Atmospheric Pressure Air Plasma Jet by Ultraviolet Absorption Spectroscopy, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 10.1109/TRPMS.2022.3195886, 7, 2, (203-209), (2023).