Prediction of Dowel Action against Concrete Core without Consideration of Transverse Reinforcement
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 12
Abstract
In this study, reinforcing bars acting as dowels were investigated. Direct shear tests on specimens with a wide range of strengths for concrete (30 and 60 MPa) and steel (400 and 600 MPa) were conducted. Furthermore, finite-element (FE) models with selected concrete and steel material models, such as damage plasticity and ductile damage models, were developed. The existing predictive equations tended to show either larger or smaller maximum dowel forces depending on the size of the dowel. Such results were obtained because consideration of the effect of dowel action in design equations for interface shear transfer were originally based on the bending resistance of the reinforcement rather than splitting failure of the concrete body. This is justifiable, because in many practical situations splitting failure is prevented by the presence of confining reinforcement or by sufficient edge distance. The different results between the predictive equations and test data for maximum dowel force were minimized by calibrating the weight factor of the dowel bars. Accordingly, new equations are proposed to improve the accuracy of maximum dowel force and the corresponding slip; the new equations use data from the tests, analytical results for the current model, and from the literature. To estimate the maximum dowel forces, different coefficients were proposed depending on the failure mode and yield strength of the dowel bar. The average absolute difference ratios for the maximum dowel force and slip from a 400-MPa dowel bar were improved from 29% to 13% and 49% to 21%, respectively. The newly developed model successfully predicted the overall behavior of dowel action in a concrete structure without transverse reinforcement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grant No. 17RTRP-B071566-05 from the Railroad Technology Research Program and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant Nos. 2018R1A1A1A05018602, 2018R1C1B5045539, and BK21 FOUR) funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT and Ministry of Education). The authors greatly acknowledge this support.
References
ABAQUS. 2014. ABAQUS 6.14: User’s manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation.
Brenna, A., S. Dei Poli, and M. Di Prisco. 1990. Dowel action: Some experimental and theoretical results regarding special concretes, 321–380. Milan, Italy: Milan Univ. of Technology.
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2013. Fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Dei Poli, S., M. Di Prisco, and P. G. Gambarova. 1992. “Shear response, deformations, and subgrade stiffness of a dowel bar embedded in concrete.” Struct. J. 89 (6): 665–675.
di Prisco, M., and P. G. Gambarova. 1991. Behavior and analysis of R.C. structures under alternate actions inducing inelastic response: Interface behavior. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.
Eligehausen, R., E. P. Popov, and V. V. Bertero. 1983. Local bond stress-slip relationships of deformed bars under generalized excitations: Experimental results and analytical model. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Hooputra, H., H. Gese, H. Dell, and H. Werner. 2004. “A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions.” Int. J. Crashworthiness 9 (5): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2004.0289.
Jeong, E. 2018. Evaluation of dowel bar embedded in plain concrete subjected to direct shear. Busan, South Korea: Korea Maritime and Ocean Univ.
Kazakoff, E. E. 1974. Dowel action in reinforced concrete construction (beam-column connections). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Lee, J., and G. L. Fenves. 1998. “Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (8): 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892).
Lee, S.-C., S. Park, J. Lee, and K.-C. Lee. 2018. “Dowel behavior of rebars in small concrete block for sliding slab track on railway bridges.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3182419.
Millard, S. G., and R. P. Johnson. 1984. “Shear transfer across cracks in reinforced concrete due to aggregate interlock and to dowel action.” Mag. Concr. Res. 36 (126): 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1984.36.126.9.
Mirza, O., and B. Uy. 2010. “Effects of the combination of axial and shear loading on the behaviour of headed stud steel anchors.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.019.
Nguyen, H. T., and S. E. Kim. 2009. “Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (10–11): 1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.010.
Paulay, T., and P. J. Loeber. 1974. “Shear transfer by aggregate interlock.” ACI Spec. Publ. 42: 1–16.
Paulay, T., R. Park, and M. H. Phillips. 1974. “Horizontal construction joints in cast-in-place reinforced concrete.” ACI Spec. Publ. 42: 599–616.
Randl, N. 2007. “Load bearing behaviour of cast-in shear dowels.” Supplement, Beton- Stahlbetonbau 102 (S1): 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.200710103.
Ribeiro, J., A. Santiago, and C. Rigueiro. 2016. “Damage model calibration and application for S355 steel.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 2 (Jan): 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.085.
Soroushian, P., K. Obaseki, M. C. Rojas, and H. S. Najm. 1987. “Behavior of bars in dowel action against concrete cover.” Struct. J. 84 (2): 170–176.
Soroushian, P., K. Obaseki, M. C. Rojas, and J. Sim. 1986. “Analysis of dowel bars acting against concrete core.” J. Proc. 83 (4): 642–649.
Vintzēleou, E. N., and T. P. Tassios. 1986. “Mathematical models for dowel action under monotonic and cyclic conditions.” Mag. Concr. Res. 38 (134): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1986.38.134.13.
Vintzēleou, E. N., and T. P. Tassios. 1987. “Behavior of dowels under cyclic deformations.” ACI Struct. J. 84 (1): 18–30.
Walraven, J. C., and H. W. Reinhardt. 1981. “Theory and experiments on mechanical behaviour of cracks in plain and reinforced concrete subjected to shear loading.” Heron 26 (1): 1–68.
Wong, P. S., F. J. Vecchio, and H. Trommels. 2013. Vector2 & formworks user’s manual. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 1, 2019
Accepted: Feb 28, 2020
Published online: Sep 26, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 26, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.