Technical Papers
Sep 26, 2020

Prediction of Dowel Action against Concrete Core without Consideration of Transverse Reinforcement

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 12

Abstract

In this study, reinforcing bars acting as dowels were investigated. Direct shear tests on specimens with a wide range of strengths for concrete (30 and 60 MPa) and steel (400 and 600 MPa) were conducted. Furthermore, finite-element (FE) models with selected concrete and steel material models, such as damage plasticity and ductile damage models, were developed. The existing predictive equations tended to show either larger or smaller maximum dowel forces depending on the size of the dowel. Such results were obtained because consideration of the effect of dowel action in design equations for interface shear transfer were originally based on the bending resistance of the reinforcement rather than splitting failure of the concrete body. This is justifiable, because in many practical situations splitting failure is prevented by the presence of confining reinforcement or by sufficient edge distance. The different results between the predictive equations and test data for maximum dowel force were minimized by calibrating the weight factor of the dowel bars. Accordingly, new equations are proposed to improve the accuracy of maximum dowel force and the corresponding slip; the new equations use data from the tests, analytical results for the current model, and from the literature. To estimate the maximum dowel forces, different coefficients were proposed depending on the failure mode and yield strength of the dowel bar. The average absolute difference ratios for the maximum dowel force and slip from a 400-MPa dowel bar were improved from 29% to 13% and 49% to 21%, respectively. The newly developed model successfully predicted the overall behavior of dowel action in a concrete structure without transverse reinforcement.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grant No. 17RTRP-B071566-05 from the Railroad Technology Research Program and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant Nos. 2018R1A1A1A05018602, 2018R1C1B5045539, and BK21 FOUR) funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT and Ministry of Education). The authors greatly acknowledge this support.

References

ABAQUS. 2014. ABAQUS 6.14: User’s manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation.
Brenna, A., S. Dei Poli, and M. Di Prisco. 1990. Dowel action: Some experimental and theoretical results regarding special concretes, 321–380. Milan, Italy: Milan Univ. of Technology.
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2013. Fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Dei Poli, S., M. Di Prisco, and P. G. Gambarova. 1992. “Shear response, deformations, and subgrade stiffness of a dowel bar embedded in concrete.” Struct. J. 89 (6): 665–675.
di Prisco, M., and P. G. Gambarova. 1991. Behavior and analysis of R.C. structures under alternate actions inducing inelastic response: Interface behavior. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.
Eligehausen, R., E. P. Popov, and V. V. Bertero. 1983. Local bond stress-slip relationships of deformed bars under generalized excitations: Experimental results and analytical model. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Hooputra, H., H. Gese, H. Dell, and H. Werner. 2004. “A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions.” Int. J. Crashworthiness 9 (5): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2004.0289.
Jeong, E. 2018. Evaluation of dowel bar embedded in plain concrete subjected to direct shear. Busan, South Korea: Korea Maritime and Ocean Univ.
Kazakoff, E. E. 1974. Dowel action in reinforced concrete construction (beam-column connections). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Lee, J., and G. L. Fenves. 1998. “Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (8): 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892).
Lee, S.-C., S. Park, J. Lee, and K.-C. Lee. 2018. “Dowel behavior of rebars in small concrete block for sliding slab track on railway bridges.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3182419.
Millard, S. G., and R. P. Johnson. 1984. “Shear transfer across cracks in reinforced concrete due to aggregate interlock and to dowel action.” Mag. Concr. Res. 36 (126): 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1984.36.126.9.
Mirza, O., and B. Uy. 2010. “Effects of the combination of axial and shear loading on the behaviour of headed stud steel anchors.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.019.
Nguyen, H. T., and S. E. Kim. 2009. “Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (10–11): 1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.010.
Paulay, T., and P. J. Loeber. 1974. “Shear transfer by aggregate interlock.” ACI Spec. Publ. 42: 1–16.
Paulay, T., R. Park, and M. H. Phillips. 1974. “Horizontal construction joints in cast-in-place reinforced concrete.” ACI Spec. Publ. 42: 599–616.
Randl, N. 2007. “Load bearing behaviour of cast-in shear dowels.” Supplement, Beton- Stahlbetonbau 102 (S1): 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.200710103.
Ribeiro, J., A. Santiago, and C. Rigueiro. 2016. “Damage model calibration and application for S355 steel.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 2 (Jan): 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.085.
Soroushian, P., K. Obaseki, M. C. Rojas, and H. S. Najm. 1987. “Behavior of bars in dowel action against concrete cover.” Struct. J. 84 (2): 170–176.
Soroushian, P., K. Obaseki, M. C. Rojas, and J. Sim. 1986. “Analysis of dowel bars acting against concrete core.” J. Proc. 83 (4): 642–649.
Vintzēleou, E. N., and T. P. Tassios. 1986. “Mathematical models for dowel action under monotonic and cyclic conditions.” Mag. Concr. Res. 38 (134): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1986.38.134.13.
Vintzēleou, E. N., and T. P. Tassios. 1987. “Behavior of dowels under cyclic deformations.” ACI Struct. J. 84 (1): 18–30.
Walraven, J. C., and H. W. Reinhardt. 1981. “Theory and experiments on mechanical behaviour of cracks in plain and reinforced concrete subjected to shear loading.” Heron 26 (1): 1–68.
Wong, P. S., F. J. Vecchio, and H. Trommels. 2013. Vector2 & formworks user’s manual. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Apr 1, 2019
Accepted: Feb 28, 2020
Published online: Sep 26, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Euiseok Jeong, S.M.ASCE
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Box 2219 University Station, Brookings, SD 57007.
Kyoung-Chan Lee
Senior Researcher, Advanced Railroad Civil Engineering Div., Korea Railroad Research Institute, 176 Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do 16105, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Cheol Lee
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National Univ., 80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Box 2219 University Station, Brookings, SD 57007. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-9319
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Korea Maritime and Ocean Univ., 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6610-6404. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share