Technical Papers
Jan 23, 2020

Reliability Analysis of Code-Conforming Steel-Frame Structures against Column-Loss Scenarios

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

This study investigates the reliability of code-conforming steel-frame structures against column-loss scenarios. The reliability assessment employs the subset simulation method and alternate path method. The subset simulation algorithm is intended to predict the failure probability of the uncertain system. The alternate path method together with a three-dimensional (3D) numerical model is used to evaluate the collapse behavior of sample structures. The developed computational framework is applied to two code-conforming steel-frames structures. The reliability level and most probable failure modes of structures against column loss are obtained. Based on the failure samples generated, sensitivity analyses are carried out. The influential uncertain parameters and their effects are quantified. Finally, the effect of standard tie-force requirements on reducing collapse risk is evaluated. Results show that the failure probabilities of structures with a moment frame missing range from 2.1×103 to 1.9×104 with an average reliability index of 3.05. In contrast, the average failure probability of structure with a gravity column missing is over 0.5. The standard tie-force requirements are found to be insufficient to reduce collapse risk of the structure. The reliability level of the strengthened structure is still 30% lower than the codified target reliability level of 3.0–3.5.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Part of the study was finished under guidance from Professors Yang Ding and Haitao Zhu (Tianjin University, China). Xiaoran Song would also like to thank Dr. Honghao Li (University of Michigan) for providing the NIST report. The author wishes to thank editors and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

Alashker, Y., and S. El-Tawil. 2012. “A design-oriented model for the collapse resistance of composite floors subjected to column loss.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (1): 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.008.
Alashker, Y., H. Li, and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Approximations in progressive collapse modeling.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (9): 914–924. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000452.
Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 2000. Probability concepts in engineering design. New York: Wiley.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Au, S. K. 2005. “Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation.” Comput. Struct. 83 (14): 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.015.
Au, S. K., and J. L. Beck. 2003. “Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 129 (8): 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:8(901).
Au, S. K., and Y. Wang. 2014. Engineering risk assessment with subset simulation. New York: Wiley.
Bao, Y., J. A. Main, and S. Y. Noh. 2017. “Evaluation of structural robustness against column loss: Methodology and application to RC frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (8): 04017066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001795.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of concrete structures, part 1-2: General rules structural fire design. Eurocode 2: BS EN1992-1-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Ding, Y., X. Song, and H. T. Zhu. 2017a. “Probabilistic progressive collapse analysis of steel-concrete composite floor systems.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 129 (Feb): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.009.
Ding, Y., X. Song, and H. T. Zhu. 2017b. “Probabilistic progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structures against blast loads.” Eng. Struct. 147 (Sep): 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.063.
Ellingwood, B., T. V. Galambus, J. G. MacGregor, and C. A. Cornell. 1980. Development of a probability based load criteria for American National Standard A58, building code requirements for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
Ellingwood, B. R. 2006. “Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (4): 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(315).
El-Tawil, S., H. Li, and S. Kunnath. 2014. “Computational simulation of gravity-induced progressive collapse of steel-frame buildings: Current trends and future research needs.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A2513001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000897.
Fu, Q. N., K. H. Tan, X. H. Zhou, and B. Yang. 2018. “Three-dimensional composite floor systems under column-removal scnearios.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (10): 04018196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002197.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2013. Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance. Washington, DC: GSA.
Haario, H., M. Laine, A. Mira, and E. Saksman. 2006. “DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC.” Stat. Comput. 16 (4): 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-006-9438-0.
Haldar, A., and S. Mahadevan. 2000. Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. New York: Wiley.
Hallquist, J. O. 2007. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual (version 971). Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Hao, H. 2015. “Predictions of structural response to dynamic loads of different loading rates.” Int. J. Protective Struct. 6 (4): 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.6.4.585.
Khandelwal, K., S. El-Tawil, S. K. Kunnath, and H. S. Lew. 2008. “Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: Steel frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (7): 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1070).
Koduru, S. D., and T. Haukaas. 2010. “Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 32 (2): 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.001.
Kunnath, S. K., Y. Bao, and S. El-Tawil. 2018. “Advances in computational simulation of gravity-induced disproportionate collapse of RC frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (2): 03117003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001938.
Lew, H. S., J. A. Main, S. D. Robert, F. Sadek, and V. P. Chiarito. 2013. “Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. I: Experiments.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (1): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000618.
Li, H., and S. El-Tawil. 2013. “Three-dimensional effects and collapse resistance mechanisms in steel frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000839.
Liang, X., Q. Shen, and S. Ghosh. 2006. Assessing ability of seismic structural system to withstand progressive collapse: Seismic design and progressive collapse analysis of steel frame buildings. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Main, J. A. 2014. “Composite floor systems under column loss: Collapse resistance and tie force requirements.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000952.
Oosterhof, S. A., and R. G. Driver. 2015. “Behavior of steel shear connections under column-removal demands.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001073.
Park, J., and J. Kim. 2010. “Fragility analysis of steel moment frames with various seismic connections subjected to sudden loss of a column.” Eng. Struct. 32 (6): 1547–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.003.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). 2009. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC-4-023-03. Washington, DC: Dept. of Defense.
Wiśniewski, D. F., P. J. Cruz, A. A. R. Henriques, and R. A. Simões. 2012. “Probabilistic models for mechanical properties of concrete, reinforcing steel and pre-stressing steel.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (2): 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470903363164.
Xu, G., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2011. “Probabilistic robustness assessment of pre-Northridge steel moment resisting frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (9): 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000403.
Yang, B., and K. H. Tan. 2013. “Robustness of bolted-angle connections against progressive collapse: Experimental tests of beam-column joints and development of component-based models.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (9): 1498–1514. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000749.
Zuev, K. M., J. L. Beck, S. K. Au, and L. S. Katafygiotis. 2012. “Bayesian post-processor and other enhancements of subset simulation for estimating failure probabilities in high dimensions.” Comput. Struct. 92–93 (Feb): 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.10.017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Mar 23, 2019
Accepted: Sep 4, 2019
Published online: Jan 23, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 23, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ., Shijiazhuang 050043, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1683-0319. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share