Technical Papers
Jul 18, 2018

Seismic Retrofit of an Existing 10-Story Chevron-Braced Steel-Frame

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 10

Abstract

A seismically deficient 10-story chevron-braced frame located on the west coast of Canada is retrofitted using different schemes. The building was designed in accordance with the Canadian codes applicable in the mid-1980s, prior to the implementation of the special seismic design provisions in the steel design standard. The ASCE 41 nonlinear dynamic procedure (NDP) was used to develop and validate the retrofit schemes. The performance objective was collapse prevention under seismic hazard with probability of exceedance of 2% in 50 years. Three retrofit solutions developed to satisfy the ASCE 41 component-based criteria and achieve uniform demand-to-capacity ratios over the structure height exhibited inadequate global inelastic seismic response characterized by soft-story mechanisms and structural collapse. The same behavior was observed after having increased the lateral strength of the system by 80%, clearly indicating that ASCE 41 should include acceptance criteria aimed at verifying overall seismic response. Story drift concentration and structural collapse could be avoided by combining the retrofitted braced frame with a moment frame or elastic vertical truss installed from outside along the perimeter walls. A vertical truss with a flexural hinge at midheight was found to be the most cost-effective option. The exterior frames can serve as temporary lateral system during the repair of the existing braced frame.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the Canadian Seismic Research Network (CSRN).

References

AISC. 2010. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341–10. Chicago: AISC.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41–13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Balazadeh-Minouei, Y., S. Koboevic, and R. Tremblay. 2017. “Seismic evaluation of a steel braced frame using NBCC and ASCE 41.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 135: 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.03.017.
Balazadeh-Minouei, Y., S. Koboevic, and R. Tremblay. 2018. “Seismic assessment of existing steel chevron braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (6): 04018046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002037.
Bech, D., B. Tremayne, and J. Houston. 2015. “Proposed changes to steel column evaluation criteria for existing buildings.” In Proc., 2nd ATC & SEI Conf. on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. San Francisco: ASCE.
Chen, L., R. Tremblay, and L. Tirca. 2012. “Seismic performance of modular braced frames for multi-storey building application.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 1978. Limit states design of steel structures. CSA CAN3 S16.1-M78. Toronto: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2009. Design of steel structures. CSA-S16-09. Toronto: CSA.
Erduran, E., N. D. Dao, and K. L. Ryan. 2011. “Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (10): 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1078.
Foutch, D. A., S. C. Goel, and C. W. Roeder. 1987. “Seismic testing of full-scale steel building. I.” J. Struct. Eng. 113 (11): 2111–2129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:11(2111).
ICBO (International Conference of Building Officials). 1979. Uniform building code 1979. Long Beach, CA: ICBO.
Khatib, I. F., S. A. Mahin, and K. S. Pister. 1988. Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Lai, J.-W., and S. A. Mahin. 2015. “Strongback system: A way to reduce damage concentration in steel-braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (9): 04014223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001198.
Martini, K., N. Amin, P. L. Lee, and D. Bonowitz. 1990. “The potential role of non-linear analysis in the seismic design of building structures.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 4th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 67–76. Oakland, CA: EERI.
McKenna, F., and G. L. Fenves. 2004. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Merzouq, S., and R. Tremblay. 2006. “Seismic design of dual concentrically braced steel frames for stable seismic performance for multi-storey buildings.” In Proc., 8th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: EERI.
Mitchell, D., P. Paultre, R. Tinawi, M. Saatcioglu, R. Tremblay, K. Elwood, J. Adams, and R. DeVall. 2010. “Evolution of seismic design codes in Canada.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 37 (9): 1157–1170. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-054.
Mottier, P., R. Tremblay, and C. Rogers. 2017. “Seismic retrofit of existing low-rise steel buildings in eastern Canada using rocking braced frame system.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (2): 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2953.
NRCC (National Research Council of Canada). 1980. National building code of Canada 1980. 8th ed. Ottawa: NRCC.
NRCC (National Research Council of Canada). 2010. National building code of Canada 2010. 13th ed. Ottawa: NRCC.
Packer, J. A., S. P. Chiew, R. Tremblay, and G. Martinez-Saucedo. 2010. “Effect of material properties on hollow section performance.” Struct. Build. 163 (6): 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2010.163.6.375.
Pollino, M., D. Slovenec, B. Qu, and G. Mosqueda. 2017. “Seismic rehabilitation of concentrically braced frames using stiff rocking cores.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (9): 04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001810.
Qu, B., F. Sanchez-Zamora, and M. Pollino. 2014. “Transforming seismic performance of deficient steel concentrically braced frames through implementation of rocking cores.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (5): 04014139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001198.
Rai, D., and S. Goel. 2003. “Seismic evaluation and upgrading of chevron braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 59 (8): 971–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00006-3.
Sen, A. D., C. W. Roeder, J. W. Berman, D. E. Lehman, C.-H. Li, A.-C. Wu, and K.-C. Tsai. 2016. “Experimental investigation of chevron concentrically braced frames with yielding beams.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (12): 04016123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001597.
Sen, A. D., M. A. Swatosh, R. Ballard, D. Sloat, M. M. Johnson, C. W. Roeder, D. E. Lehman, and J. W. Berman. 2017. “Development and evaluation of seismic retrofit alternatives for older concentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (5): 04016232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001738.
Sorace, S., and G. Terenzi. 2008. “Seismic protection of frame structures by fluid viscous damped braces.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(45).
Speicher, M. S., and J. L. Harris III. 2016. “Collapse prevention seismic performance assessment of new special concentrically braced frames using ASCE 41.” Eng. Struct. 126: 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.064.
Symans, M., F. Charney, A. Whittaker, M. Constantinou, C. Kircher, M. Johnson, and R. McNamara. 2008. “Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(3).
Tremblay, R. 2003. “Achieving a stable inelastic seismic response for multi-story concentrically braced steel frames.” Eng. J. 40 (2): 111–129.
Tremblay, R., L. Chen, and L. Tirca. 2014. “Enhancing the seismic performance of multi-storey buildings with a modular tied braced frame system with added energy dissipating devices.” Int. J. High-Rise Build. 3 (1): 21–33.
Whittaker, A. S., C.-M. Uang, and V. V. Bertero. 1990. “Experimental seismic response of steel dual systems.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 4th US National Conf., on Earthquake Engineering, 655–664. Oakland, CA: EERI.
Yang, C. S., R. T. Leon, and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Design and behaviour of zipper braced frames.” Eng. Struct. 30 (4): 1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.06.010.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 10October 2018

History

Received: Jul 14, 2017
Accepted: Apr 16, 2018
Published online: Jul 18, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 18, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yasaman Balazadeh-Minouei, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7; presently, Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R3 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Robert Tremblay
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7.
Sanda Koboevic
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share