Technical Papers
Jul 19, 2018

Seismic Fragility Functions via Nonlinear Response History Analysis

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 10

Abstract

The estimation of building fragility, i.e., the probability function of seismic demand exceeding a certain limit state capacity given the seismic intensity, is a common process inherent in any seismic assessment study. Despite this prolific nature, the theory and practice underlying the various approaches for fragility evaluation may be opaque to their users, especially regarding the handling of demand and capacity uncertainty, or the generation of a single fragility curve for multiple failure conditions, using either an intensity measure or engineering demand parameter basis. Hence, this paper provides a comprehensive guide that compiles all necessary information for generating fragility curves of single structures based on the results of nonlinear dynamic analysis. Although various analysis methods are discussed, incremental dynamic analysis is invoked to clearly outline different methodologies that rely either on response parameter or intensity measure ordinates. Step-by-step examples are presented for each case, under both a deterministic and an uncertain limit state capacity framework, using limit states that range from simple structural damage to the global collapse of the structure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ASCE. 2007. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41–06. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. ATC-13. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Bakalis, K., D. Vamvatsikos, and M. Fragiadakis. 2017. “Seismic risk assessment of liquid storage tanks via a nonlinear surrogate model.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (15): 2851–2868. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2939.
Baker, J. W. 2015. “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell. 2006. “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (9): 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571.
Bazzurro, P., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (VPSHA).” In Proc., 7th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Bazzurro, P., C. A. Cornell, C. Menun, M. Motahari, and N. Luco. 2006. Advanced seismic assessment guidelines. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Bazzurro, P., C. A. Cornell, N. Shome, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. “Three proposals for characterizing MDOF nonlinear seismic response.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (11): 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1281).
Bradley, B. A. 2011. “Correlation of significant duration with amplitude and cumulative intensity measures and its use in ground motion selection.” J. Earthquake Eng. 15 (6): 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.557140.
Chandramohan, R., J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein. 2015. “Impact of computational choices on estimated structural collapse capacity under earthquake ground motions.” In Proc., Engineering Mechanics Institute Conf. Stanford, CA: Blume Center.
Cordova, P., G. Deierlein, S. F. Mehanny, and C. A. Cornell. 2001. “Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic design procedure.” In Proc., 2nd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, 187–206. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News 3 (2): 1–4.
D’Ayala, D., A. Meslem, D. Vamvatsikos, K. Porter, and T. Rossetto. 2015. Guidelines for analytical vulnerability assessment of low/mid-rise buildings. Pavia, Italy: Vulnerability Global Component Project.
Deierlein, G. G., H. Krawinkler, and C. A. Cornell. 2003. “A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 7th Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Der Kiureghian, A., and O. Ditlevsen. 2009. “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
Dolsek, M. 2009. “Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (6): 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.869.
Eads, L., E. Miranda, and D. Lignos. 2016. “Spectral shape metrics and structural collapse potential.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (10): 1643–1659. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2739.
Ellingwood, B. R., and K. Kinali. 2009. “Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment.” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.001.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P-695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA P-58. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fragiadakis, M., D. Vamvatsikos, and M. Aschheim. 2014. “Application of nonlinear static procedures for the seismic assessment of regular RC moment frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (2): 767–794. https://doi.org/10.1193/111511EQS281M.
Gidaris, I., J. E. Padgett, A. R. Barbosa, S. Chen, D. Cox, B. Webb, and A. Cerato. 2017. “Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the United States: State-of-the-art review.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (3): 401618. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001672.
Goulet, C. A., C. B. Haselton, J. Mitrani-Reiser, J. L. Beck, G. G. Deierlein, K. A. Porter, and J. P. Stewart. 2007. “Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—From seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1973–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.694.
Jaiswal, K., D. Wald, and D. D’Ayala. 2011. “Developing empirical collapse fragility functions for global building types.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3606398.
Jalayer, F. 2003. “Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Jalayer, F., and C. A. Cornell. 2009. “Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (8): 951–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.876.
Jalayer, F., P. Franchin, and P. E. Pinto. 2007. “A scalar damage measure for seismic reliability analysis of RC frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 2059–2079. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.704.
Kazantzi, A. K., and D. Vamvatsikos. 2015. “Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2677–2694. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2603.
Kazantzi, A. K., D. Vamvatsikos, and D. G. Lignos. 2014. “Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty.” Eng. Struct. 78: 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.044.
Kennedy, R. P., and M. K. Ravindra. 1984. “Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 79 (1): 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2.
Kohrangi, M., P. Bazzurro, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2016. “Vector and scalar IMs in structural response estimation. Part II: Building demand assessment.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1525–1543. https://doi.org/10.1193/053115EQS081M.
Lallemant, D., A. Kiremidjian, and H. Burton. 2015. “Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (9): 1373–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2522.
Liel, A. B., C. B. Haselton, G. G. Deierlein, and J. W. Baker. 2009. “Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings.” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.002.
Lignos, D. G., H. Krawinkler, and A. S. Whittaker. 2011. “Prediction and validation of sidesway collapse of two scale models of a 4-story steel moment frame.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (7): 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1061.
Luco, N., and P. Bazzurro. 2007. “Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses?” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1813–1835. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.695.
Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 357–392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
Mackie, K., and B. Stojadinovic. 2001. “Probabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468).
Miranda, E., and H. Aslani. 2003. Probabilistic response assessment for building-specific loss estimation. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Mitrani-Reiser, J. 2007. “An ounce of prevention: Probabilistic loss estimation for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Moehle, J. P., and G. G. Deierlein. 2004. “A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007a. “Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (3): 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007b. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
Noh, H. Y., D. Lallemant, and A. S. Kiremidjian. 2015. “Development of empirical and analytical fragility functions using kernel smoothing methods.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (8): 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2505.
Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (8): 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.801.
Porter, K., J. Mitrani-Reiser, and J. L. Beck. 2006. “Near-real-time loss estimation for instrumented buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 15 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.340.
Porter, K. A. 2015. “A beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk.” Accessed January 26, 2016. http://spot.colorado.edu/∼porterka/Porter-beginners-guide.pdf.
Raghunandan, M., A. B. Liel, and N. Luco. 2015. “Collapse risk of buildings in the Pacific Northwest region due to subduction earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (4): 2087–2115. https://doi.org/10.1193/012114EQS011M.
Romão, X., R. Delgado, and A. Costa. 2011. “Assessment of the statistical distributions of structural demand under earthquake loading.” J. Earthquake Eng. 15 (5): 724–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2010.539296.
Rossetto, T., and A. Elnashai. 2005. “A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures.” Eng. Struct. 27 (3): 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.002.
Rossetto, T., I. Ioannou, D. Grant, and T. Maqsood. 2014. Guidelines for empirical vulnerability assessment. Pavia, Itally: GEM Foundation.
Schotanus, M. I. J., P. Franchin, A. Lupoi, and P. E. Pinto. 2004. “Seismic fragility analysis of 3D structures.” Struct. Saf. 26 (4): 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.03.001.
Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, J. Lee, and T. Naganuma. 2000. “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12): 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224).
Shome, N. 1999. “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Shome, N., C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra 14 (3): 469–500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011.
Silva, V., H. Crowley, H. Varum, R. Pinho, and R. Sousa. 2014. “Evaluation of analytical methodologies used to derive vulnerability functions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (2): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2337.
Stoica, M., R. A. Medina, and R. H. McCuen. 2007. “Improved probabilistic quantification of drift demands for seismic evaluation.” Struct. Saf. 29 (2): 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.03.003.
Tothong, P., and C. A. Cornell. 2008. “Structural performance assessment under near-source pulse-like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (7): 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.792.
Tsantaki, S., C. Adam, and L. F. Ibarra. 2017. “Intensity measures that reduce collapse capacity dispersion of P-delta vulnerable simple systems.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (3): 1085–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9994-4.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2004. “Applied incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (2): 523–553. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737737.
Vamvatsikos, D., and M. Fragiadakis. 2010. “Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 (2): 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.935.
Vathi, M., S. A. Karamanos, I. A. Kapogiannis, and K. V. Spiliopoulos. 2017. “Performance criteria for liquid storage tanks and piping systems subjected to seismic loading.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 139 (5): 51801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036916.
Wen, Y. K., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2005. “The role of fragility assessment in consequence-based engineering.” Earthquake Spectra 21 (3): 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1979502.
Zareian, F., L. Ibarra, and H. Krawinkler. 2004. “Seismic demands and capacities of single-story and low-rise multi-story woodframe structures.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Zeris, C., D. Vamvatsikos, and P. Giannitsas. 2007. “Impact of FE modeling in the seismic performance prediction of existing RC buildings.” In Proc., ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Barcelona, Spain: European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 10October 2018

History

Received: Aug 2, 2017
Accepted: Mar 8, 2018
Published online: Jul 19, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical Univ. of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-1059. Email: [email protected]
Dimitrios Vamvatsikos [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical Univ. of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share