Technical Papers
Jun 14, 2018

Design and Optimization of Seismic Isolation and Damping Devices for Highway Bridges Based on Probabilistic Repair Cost Ratio

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 8

Abstract

Design of seismic protective devices for highway bridges is often a highly iterative and tedious process due to the nonlinear behavior of the system, a large range of design parameters, and uncertainty of ground motions. This paper develops a design surface of system-level repair cost ratios (i.e., the repair costs normalized by bridge replacement costs) for various base-isolated bridges to facilitate the performance-based design and optimization of seismic protective devices. First, component-level fragility functions are derived for multiple base-isolation design cases as functions of earthquake input intensity. Second, nearly identical fragility functions for different isolation designs are obtained when failure probabilities are conditioned on the median engineering demand parameters (EDPs) instead. Subsequently, system-level repair cost ratio is derived by combining the failure probabilities of bridge components in terms of various EDPs. The function surface of the derived repair cost ratio with respect to EDPs is identical across different isolation designs. Hence it can serve as a performance index to facilitate the design and optimization of seismic protective devices. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a case study on Painter Street Overcrossing, a typical highway bridge in California. It is shown that optimal design parameters can be obtained to significantly reduce the overall repair cost ratio of the bridge with consideration of uncertainties and variabilities of ground motions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2014. Guide specifications for seismic isolation design. 4th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adeli, H., and N. T. Cheng. 1994. “Concurrent genetic algorithms for optimization of large structures.” J. Aero. Eng. 7 (3): 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1994)7:3(276).
Agrawal, A., M. Ghosn, S. Alampalli, and Y. Pan. 2012. “Seismic fragility of retrofitted multispan continuous steel bridges in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (4): 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000290.
Ancheta, T. D., et al. 2013. “PEER NGA-West 2 database.” PEER 2013/03. Accessed June 16, 2016. http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications.
Baker, J. 2015. “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Buckle, I. G., and R. L. Mayes. 1990. “Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance—A world overview.” Earthquake Spectra 6 (2): 161–201. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585564.
California Department of Conservation. 2008. “Ground motion interpolator.” Accessed July 5, 2016. http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/PSHA/psha_interpolator.html.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2009. Anti-seismic devices. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cha, Y.-J., A. K. Agrawal, Y. Kim, and M. Raicha. 2012. “Multi-objective genetic algorithms for cost-effective distributions of actuators and sensors in large structures.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (9): 7822–7833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.070.
Choi, E., R. DesRoches, and B. G. Nielson. 2004. “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 26 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News 3 (2): 1–4.
Dicleli, M., and S. Buddaram. 2006. “Effect of isolator and ground motion characteristics on the performance of seismic-isolated bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (2): 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
FEMA. 2003. “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model.” In HAZUS-MH MR4—Technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2006. Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: Program plan for new and existing buildings. FEMA 445. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA P-58. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Franchin, P., and P. Pinto. 2012. “Method for probabilistic displacement-based design of RC structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (5): 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000492.
Goel, R. K., and A. Chopra. 1997. “Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity and stiffness during earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 13 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585929.
Jangid, R. S. 2005. “Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions.” Eng. Struct. 27 (3): 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.013.
Jangid, R. S. 2007. “Optimal lead-rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions.” Eng. Struct. 29 (10): 2503–2513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.010.
Jiang, X., and H. Adeli. 2008. “Neuro-genetic algorithm for nonlinear active control of structures.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 75 (7): 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2274.
Karim, K. R., and F. Yamazaki. 2007. “Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (5): 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.10.006.
Kim, H. S., and P. N. Roschke. 2006. “Fuzzy control of base-isolation system using multi-objective genetic algorithm.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 21 (6): 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.2006.21.issue-6.
Krawinkler, H., F. Zareian, R. A. Medina, and L. F. Ibarra. 2006. “Decision support for conceptual performance-based design.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (1): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.536.
Kunde, M. C., and R. S. Jangid. 2003. “Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A state-of-the-art review.” Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 3: 140–170.
Lagaros, N. D., A. D. Fotis, and A. K. Stilianos. 2006. “Assessment of seismic design procedures based on the total cost.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (11): 1381–1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.585.
Mackie, K. R., and B. Stojadinovi¢. 2007. “Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limits states.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1953–1971. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.699.
Makris, N., D. Badoni, E. Delis, and G. Gazetas. 1994. “Prediction of observed bridge response with soil-pile-structure interaction.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (10): 2992–3011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2992).
Makris, N., and C. Black. 2004. “Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (9): 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1019).
Makris, N., and S. P. Chang. 2000. “Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 (1): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Makris, N., and G. Kampas. 2013. “The engineering merit of the ‘effective period’ of bilinear isolation systems.” Earthquake Struct. 4 (4): 397–428. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.4.397.
Makris, N., and J. Zhang. 2004. “Seismic response analysis of a highway overcrossing equipped with elastomeric bearings and fluid dampers.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (6): 830–845. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(830).
Mayes, R. L., I. G. Buckle, T. E. Kelly, and L. R. Jones. 1992. “AASHTO seismic isolation design requirements for highway bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 118 (1): 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:1(284).
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake simulation (OpenSees) command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
Ozbulut, O. E., and S. Hurlebaus. 2011. “Optimal design of superelastic friction type isolators for seismic protection of highway bridges against near-fault earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (3): 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.v40.3.
Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (8): 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.801.
Padgett, J. E., B. G. Nielson, and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (5): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York, NY: Wiley.
Seible, F., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1999. “Lessons learned from bridge performance during Northridge Earthquake.” Spec. Publ. 187: 29–55.
Shen, J., M. H. Tsai, K. C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2004. “Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (6): 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(861).
Siqueira, G. H., A. S. Sanda, P. Paultre, and J. E. Padgett. 2014. “Fragility curves for isolated bridges in eastern Canada using experimental results.” Eng. Struct. 74: 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.053.
Soneji, B. B., and R. S. Jangid. 2007. “Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge.” Eng. Struct. 29 (1): 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034.
Symans, M. D., and M. C. Constantinou. 1998. “Passive fluid viscous damping systems for seismic energy dissipation.” ISET J. Earthquake Technol. 35 (4): 185–206.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Wang, Y. P., L. L. Chung, and W. H. Liao. 1998. “Seismic response analysis of bridges isolated with friction pendulum bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27 (10): 1069–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Xie, Y. 2017. “Seismic modeling, quantifying and protection of highway bridges considering shaking and lateral spreading.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California.
Xie, Y., Y. Huo, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Development and validation of p-y modeling approach for seismic response predictions of highway bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (4): 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2804.
Xie, Y., and J. Zhang. 2017. “Optimal design of seismic protective devices for highway bridges using performance based methodology and multi-objective genetic optimization.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (3): 04016129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001009.
Yi, J. H., S. H. Kim, and S. Kushiyama. 2007. “PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges.” Eng. Struct. 29 (7): 1312–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.019.
Yun, S.-Y., R. O. Hamburger, C. A. Cornell, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534).
Zhang, J., and Y. Huo. 2009. “Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method.” Eng. Struct. 31 (8): 1648–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017.
Zhang, J., and N. Makris. 2002. “Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossing including soil-structure interaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (11): 1967–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 8August 2018

History

Received: Apr 21, 2017
Accepted: Mar 7, 2018
Published online: Jun 14, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 14, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rive Univ., MS 318, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-5808. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share