Technical Papers
Jul 3, 2018

Multihazard Risk-Based Resilience Analysis of East and West Coast Buildings Designed to Current Codes

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 9

Abstract

Resilience of buildings in the face of earthquakes and wind is not explicitly addressed by current building codes and standards, but the importance of a building’s ability to bounce back in the face of these hazards and become functional soon after is gaining more interest. Given that the East and West Coasts of the United States pose different earthquake and wind hazards, evaluation of code-designed buildings in these two regions can provide much needed insight into the level of multihazard resilience they possess. This paper evaluates the resilience of two 7-story reinforced concrete moment frame buildings designed by current codes and standards in two cities: Boston and San Francisco. By employing new and existing models for hazard, demand, and capacity, and accounting for uncertainty, the cost and loss of function resulting from wind and earthquake hazards over the life of these two buildings are assessed. Deformation demand on structural framing, interior partitions, and the building envelope is evaluated using nonlinear time history analysis under a suite of ground motions in San Francisco and using a new approach based on modal analysis in Boston. Performance of envelope components under extreme wind conditions is evaluated by considering the effects of wind pressure as well as windborne debris impact. Building resilience is then assessed in terms of estimated repair cost and loss of function over the life of the building. It is discussed that unrepairable damage from permanent drift is an important factor for resilience because it contributes significantly to expected repair cost and loss of function. For wind hazard, it is shown that damage to flat roof covering is not a significant contributor to building resilience in either location. Furthermore, the need for having impact resistance design of glazing is discussed because the associated repair cost and loss of function are considerable.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1455450. The authors greatly appreciate this support.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ancheta, T., et al. 2014. “NGA-West2 database.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS197M.
Ang, A. H., and C. A. Cornell. 1974. “Reliability bases of structural safety and design.” J. Struct. Div. 100 (9): 1755–1769.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2016. Standard practice for determining load resistance of glass in buildings. ASTM E1300-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Benavent-Climent, A., D. Escolano-Margarit, and L. Morillas. 2014. “Shake-table tests of a reinforced concrete frame designed following modern codes: Seismic performance and damage evaluation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (6): 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2372.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Cui, W., and L. Caracoglia. 2015. “Simulation and analysis of intervention costs due to wind-induced damage on tall buildings.” Eng. Struct. 87: 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.001.
Der Kiureghian, A. 2005. “Non-ergodicity and PEER’s framework formula.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (13): 1643–1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.504.
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2005a. Hurricane Ivan in Alabama and Florida: Mitigation Assessment Team Report: Observations, recommendations and technical guidance. FEMA 489. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2005b. Summary report on building performance: 2004 hurricane season. FEMA 490. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2006. Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf Coast: Mitigation Assessment Team report: Building performance observations, recommendations, and technical guidance. FEMA 549. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009. Hurricane Ike in Texas and Louisiana: Mitigation assessment team report, building performance, observations, recommendations, and technical guidance. FEMA P-757. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012a. HAZUS-MH 2.1 Hurricane model: technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012b. “Methodology.” Vol. 1 of Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA P-58-1. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012c. “Performance assessment calculation tool.” Vol. 3 of Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA P-58-3. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FM Global. 2015. Property loss prevention data sheets: Wind design 1–28. Johnston, RI: Factory Mutual Insurance Company.
Gierson, M. L., B. M. Phillips, and D. Duthinh. 2015. “Evaluation of ASCE 7-10 wind velocity pressure coefficients on the components and cladding of low-rise buildings using recent wind tunnel testing data.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Goulet, C., and C. Haselton. 2007. “Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced concrete frame building-from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1973–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.694.
Gurley, K., J. Pinelli, C. Subramanian, A. Cope, and L. Zhang. 2005. Florida public hurricane loss projection model. Miami: International Hurricane Research Center, Florida International Univ.
Harris, P. 1978. “The effects of thickness and temper on the resistance of glass to small missile impact.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas Tech Univ.
Haselton, C. B., A. B. Liel, G. G. Deierlein, B. S. Dean, and J. H. Chou. 2011. “Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (4): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318.
ICC (International Code Council). 2012. 2012 international building code. Washington, DC: ICC.
Jaimes, M. A., E. Reinoso, and L. Esteva. 2015. “Risk analysis for structures exposed to several multi-hazard sources.” J. Earthquake Eng. 19 (2): 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.962673.
Judd, J. 2015. “Multi-hazard performance of steel moment frame buildings with collapse prevention systems in the central and eastern United States.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ.
Karimpour, A., and N. B. Kaye. 2013. “Wind tunnel measurement of the parapet height role on roof gravel blow-off rate for two dimensional low rise buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 114: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.007.
Kennedy, R. P., and S. A. Short. 1994. Basis for seismic provisions of DOE-STD-1020. Washington, DC: DOE.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2007. “Reliability of woodframe residential construction subject to earthquakes.” Struct. Saf. 29 (4): 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.012.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2009. “Framework for multihazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(159).
Lin, N., and E. Vanmarcke. 2008. “Windborne debris risk assessment.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 23 (4): 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.01.010.
Lin, N., and E. Vanmarcke. 2010. “Windborne debris risk analysis. I: Introduction and methodology.” Wind Struct. 13 (2): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.2.191.
Luco, N., B. R. Ellingwood, R. O. Hamburger, J. D. Hooper, J. K. Kimball, and C. A. Kircher. 2007. “Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States.” In Proc., Structural Engineers Association of California 2007 Convention Proc., 163–175. Scramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
MA Building Code. 2010. The Massachusetts state building code: 780 CMR. 8th ed. Boston: Massachusetts State Board of Building Regulations and Standards.
Moghim, F., and L. Caracoglia. 2012. “A numerical model for wind-borne compact debris trajectory estimation. I: Probabilistic analysis of trajectory in the proximity of tall buildings.” Eng. Struct. 38: 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.020.
Moghim, F., and L. Caracoglia. 2014. “Effect of computer-generated turbulent wind field on trajectory of compact debris: A probabilistic analysis approach.” Eng. Struct. 59: 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.010.
Murray, J. A., E. Hecht, and M. Sasani. 2016. “Modeling bar slip in nonductile reinforced concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (10): 04016085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001551.
National Academies. 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). n.d. “National data buoy center.” Accessed June 1, 2016. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/.
Petersen, M., A. Frankel, S. Harmsen, and C. Mueller. 2008. Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. Washington, DC: USGS.
Pita, G., J.-P. Pinelli, K. Gurley, C. Subramanian, J. Weekes, and S. Hamid. 2009. “Vulnerability of mid-high rise commercial-residential buildings in the Florida public hurricane loss model.” In Proc., ESREL 2009. Prague, Czech Republic: European Safety and Reliability Association.
Richards, P. J., N. Williams, B. Laing, M. McCarty, and M. Pond. 2008. “Numerical calculation of the three-dimensional motion of wind-borne debris.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 2188–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.060.
Roofing Prices Calculator. n.d. “Roof calculator: Estimate local roofing prices for 2018.” Accessed March 13, 2017. http://www.roofcalc.org/.
RSMeans. 2016. Building construction cost data. Norwell, MA: RS Means Company.
Sadek, F., and E. Simiu. 2002. “Peak non-Gaussian wind effects for database-assisted low-rise building design.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (5): 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(530).
Sasani, M., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2001. “Seismic fragility of RC structural walls displacement approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (2): 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(219).
Scott, B., R. Park, and M. Priestley. 1982. “Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 79 (2): 13–27.
Sullivan, T. J., D. P. Welch, and G. M. Calvi. 2014. “Simplified seismic performance assessment and implications for seismic design.” Supplement, Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 13 (S1): 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0242-0.
TPU (Tokyo Polytechnic University). 2007. “Aerodynamic database for low-rise buildings.” Accessed February 1, 2016. http://wind.arch.t-kougei.ac.jp/system/eng/contents/code/tpu.
Unnikrishnan, V. U., and M. Barbato. 2016. “Performance-based hurricane engineering: A multi-hazard approach.” In Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering, edited by P. Gardoni and J. M. LaFave, 337–356. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Venanzi, I., O. Lavan, and S. Fabrizi. 2016. “Multi-hazard life-cycle performance of tall buildings under seismic and wind loads.” In Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure, edited by J. Bakker, D. Frangopol, and K. van Breugel, 177–184. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press.
Vickery, P. J., J. Lin, P. F. Skerlj, L. A. Twisdale, and K. Huang. 2006a. “HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. I: Hurricane hazard, terrain, and wind load modeling.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 7 (2): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(82).
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, J. Lin, L. A. Twisdale, M. A. Young, and F. M. Lavelle. 2006b. “HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 7 (2): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94).
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, J. Galsworthy, J. A. Peterka, P. A. Irwin, and L. A. Griffis. 2010. “Ultimate wind load design gust wind speeds in the United States for use in ASCE-7.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (5): 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000145.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 9September 2018

History

Received: Jun 8, 2017
Accepted: Mar 4, 2018
Published online: Jul 3, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 3, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew D. Joyner [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ., Boston, MA 02115. Email: [email protected]
Mehrdad Sasani, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ., Boston, MA 02115 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share