Risk-Based Prioritization of a Building Portfolio for Retrofit
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper puts forward a risk-based approach to prioritize a portfolio of buildings for retrofit. A new set of local sensitivity measures is proposed to rank the buildings based on the optimal mitigation of risk to the entire portfolio. The proposed measures employ the derivative of various risk measures with respect to the cost of retrofit for each building. These risk measures are the mean and higher moments of the total portfolio cost probability distribution. The total portfolio cost comprises the construction cost due to retrofit and the repair cost due to damage. The proposed sensitivity measures quantify the reduction of risk to the entire portfolio per dollar spent on retrofitting each building. They provide the flexibility to prioritize under risk-neutrality and risk-aversion. To quantify the risk, reliability methods were employed in which many interacting probabilistic models evaluate the costs. The proposed methodology was applied to prioritizing 114 masonry school buildings in Iran for seismic retrofit. To this end, models were developed to predict the repair and the retrofit cost of masonry structures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The financial support of Sharif University of Technology through Grant No. G930930 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank the collaboration of the State Organization of School Renovation in providing access to the records of seismic retrofit plans for school structures. In particular, the authors gratefully thank Mr. Arash Mardani, Director of Research, for valuable cooperation and discussion throughout the course of this research. Finally, the authors express their gratitude to Messrs. Hossein Nasr Azadani and Hamid Etebarian for collaboration in data collection.
References
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., and Heath, D. (1999). “Coherent measures of risk.” Math. Finance, 9(3), 203–228.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.
Bernoulli, D. (1738). “Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk.” Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36.
Bonstrom, H., and Corotis, R. B. (2015). “Optimising portfolio loss reduction using a first-order reliability method sensitivity analysis.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 11(9), 1190–1198.
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, Addison-Wesley, Boston.
Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). “First- and second-order reliability methods.” Engineering design reliability handbook, E. Nikolaidis, D. Ghiocel, and S. Singhal, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Der Kiureghian, A., Ditlevsen, O. D., and Song, J. (2007). “Availability, reliability and downtime of systems with repairable components.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92(2), 231–242.
FEMA. (1988). “Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: A handbook.” FEMA 154, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
FEMA. (1994). “Typical costs for seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. V1: Summary.” FEMA 156, Washington, DC.
Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2002). “Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations.” J. Eng. Mech., 1024–1038.
Grant, D. N., Bommer, J. J., Pinho, R., Calvi, G. M., Goretti, A., and Meroni, F. (2007). “A prioritization scheme for seismic intervention in school buildings in Italy.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 291–314.
Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C. F. (1944). “Frequency of earthquakes in California.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34(4), 185–188.
Hopkins, D. C., and Stuart, G. (2003). “Strengthening existing New Zealand buildings for earthquake: An analysis of cost benefit using annual probabilities.” Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand.
Jafarzadeh, R., Ingham, J. M., Walsh, K. Q., Hassani, N., and Ghodrati Amiri, G. R. (2014). “Using statistical regression analysis to establish construction cost models for seismic retrofit of confined masonry buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014098.
Jordaan, I. (2005). Decisions under uncertainty: Probabilistic analysis for engineering decisions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Kaklamanos, J., Boore, D. M., Thompson, E. M., and Campbell, K. W. (2010). “Implementation of the next generation attenuation (NGA) ground-motion prediction equations in Fortran and R.”, USGS, Washington, DC.
Mahsuli, M. (2012). “Probabilistic models, methods, and software for evaluating risk to civil infrastructure.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Mahsuli, M., and Haukaas, T. (2012). “Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 87–98.
Mahsuli, M., and Haukaas, T. (2013a). “Seismic risk analysis with reliability methods. Part I: Models.” Struct. Saf., 42, 54–62.
Mahsuli, M., and Haukaas, T. (2013b). “Seismic risk analysis with reliability methods. Part II: Analysis.” Struct. Saf., 42, 63–74.
Mahsuli, M., and Haukaas, T. (2013c). “Sensitivity measures for optimal mitigation of risk and reduction of model uncertainty.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 117, 9–20.
Monti, G., and Nuti, C. (1996). “A procedure for assessing the functional reliability of hospital systems.” Struct. Saf., 18(4), 277–292.
Nuti, C., Santini, S., and Vanzi, I. (2004). “Damage, vulnerability and retrofitting strategies for the Molise hospital system following the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(S1), S285–S299.
Nuti, C., and Vanzi, I. (1998). “Assessment of post-earthquake availability of hospital system and upgrading strategies.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(12), 1403–1423.
Potangaroa, R. (1985). “The seismic strengthening of existing buildings for earthquakes.” Master’s thesis, Victoria Univ., Wellington, New Zealand.
Power, M., Chiou, B., Abrahamson, N., Bozorgnia, Y., Shantz, T., and Roblee, C. (2008). “An overview of the NGA project.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 3–21.
Rahimi, H., Mahsuli, M., and Bakhshi, A. (2015). “Reliability-based seismic hazard analysis.” 12th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Rockafellar, R. T. (2007). “Coherent approaches to risk in optimization under uncertainty.” Tutorials in operations research, Vol. 3, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, Catonsville, MD, 38–61.
Rota, M., Penna, A., and Strobbia, C. L. (2008). “Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 28(10–11), 933–947.
Rt [Computer software]. Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Talebiyan, H. (2016). “Optimal seismic risk mitigation by prioritization of structures for retrofit.” Master’s thesis, Sharif Univ. of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Tesfamariam, S., and Saatcioglu, M. (2008). “Risk-based seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(3), 795–821.
Vanzi, I. (2000). “Structural upgrading strategy for electric power networks under seismic action.” Earthquake Eng. Struc. Dyn., 29(7), 1053–1073.
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Wen, Y. K. (1990). Structural load modelling and combination for performance and safety evaluation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 22, 2016
Accepted: Jun 30, 2017
Published online: Nov 11, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 11, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.