Technical Papers
Jun 3, 2013

Sustainable Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures through CO2 Emission Optimization

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 3

Abstract

Efforts are being made to achieve more efficient operation of buildings, with the goal of reducing the construction industry’s contribution to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. That contribution also includes the energy embodied in structures; that is, the energy consumed in the processes of extracting, manufacturing, transporting, and installing construction materials (including recycled materials) and elements. In particular, in spite of the use of additives such as fly ash, reinforced concrete (RC) structures, which are large consumers of cement, are responsible for a sizable proportion of worldwide carbon emissions. These emissions can be reduced significantly through the more efficient use of both concrete and steel that can be achieved by optimization. Modern optimization tools are now available that make it possible to perform large volumes of calculations efficiently that are applicable to a wide variety of structural engineering problems. This study presents an optimization approach developed with a view to allowing decision makers to balance sustainability and economic objectives. To illustrate this approach, an RC frame under gravity and lateral loads is considered in this paper. It was found that, depending upon the parameter values used in the calculations, the design optimized with respect to the CO2 footprint yields a CO2 footprint that is lower (by 5% to 10%) than the design optimized with respect to cost. The reduction can be smaller for low-rise structures and other structures with predominantly tension-controlled members. However, for structures whose members predominantly experience large compressive forces, such as high-rise buildings, the reduction may be more significant. This also may be true of certain prestressed and poststressed concrete members. Additional research aimed at ascertaining the extent to which this is the case is warranted.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Drs. Rene D. Gabbai and Emil Simiu for useful contributions to this work.

Disclaimer

Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

References

ACI. (2011). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-11M) and commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
Alcorn, A. (2003). Embodied energy and CO2 coefficients for NZ building materials, Center for Building Performance Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
Ashley, E., and Lemay, L. (2008). “Concrete’s contribution to sustainable development.” J. Green Build., 3(4), 37–49.
CTBUH. (2009). “Tall building In numbers: Tall buildings and embodied energy.” CTBUH (Council of Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat) J., 3, 50–51.
Davidovits, J. (1993). “Geopolymer cements to minimise carbon-dioxide greenhouse warming.” Ceramic Trans., 37, 165–182.
Gartner, E. (2004). “Industrially interesting approaches to ‘low-CO2’ cements.” Cement Concr. Res., 34(9), 1489–1498.
Goggins, J., Keane, T., and Kelly, A. (2010). “The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland.” Energy Build., 42(5), 735–744.
Guerra, A., Newman, A., and Leyffer, S. (2011). “Concrete structure design using mixed-integer nonlinear programming with complementarity constraints.” SIAM J. Optim., 21(3), 833–863.
Hammond, G., and Jones, C. (2008). “Inventory of carbon and energy (ICE).” Version 1.6. Carbon Vision Buildings Program, Univ. of Bath, Bath, U.K.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2005). Key world energy statistics, Paris.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation, and Development (OECD). (2003). Environmentally sustainable buildings: Challenges and policies, Paris, France.
Paya-Zaforteza, I., Yepes, V., Hospitaler, A., and González-Vidosa, F. (2009). “CO2-optimization of reinforced concrete frames by simulated annealing.” Eng. Struct., 31(7), 1501–1508.
Sahab, M. G., Ashour, A. F., and Toropov, V. V. (2005). “Cost optimisation of reinforced concrete flat slab buildings.” Eng. Struct., 27(3), 313–322.
Sartori, I., and Hestnes, A. G. (2007). “Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article.” Energy Build., 39(3), 249–257.
Struble, L., and Godfrey, J. (2004). “How sustainable is concrete?” Intl. Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 201–211.
Thormark, C. (2002). “A low-energy building in a life cycle—Its embodied energy, energy need for operation, and recycling potential.” Build. Environ., 37(4), 429–435.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2007). Buildings and climate change: Status, challenges, and opportunities, New York.
Venkatarama Reddy, B. V., and Jagadish, K. S. (2003). “Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies.” Energy Build., 35(2), 129–137.
Villalba, P., Alcala, J., Yepes, V., and González-Vidosa, F. (2010). “CO2 optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls.” 2nd Intl. Conf. Eng. Optim., Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development—International Energy Agency (WBCSD-IEA). (2009). Cement Technology Roadmap 2009: Carbon emissions reductions up to 2050, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2008). Energy efficiency in buildings—Business realities and opportunities.
Yeo, D., and Gabbai, R. D. (2011). “Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization.” Energy Build., 43(8), 2028–2033.
Yohanis, Y. G., and Norton, B. (2002). “Life-cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic single-storey office building in the U.K.” Energy, 27(1), 77–92.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141Issue 3March 2015

History

Received: Oct 2, 2012
Accepted: May 30, 2013
Published online: Jun 3, 2013
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

DongHun Yeo [email protected]
M.ASCE
IPA Research Engineer, Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Florian A. Potra
Faculty Appointee, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share