Technical Papers
Feb 28, 2022

Large-Scale Open-Jet Testing for Cladding Design in High-Rise Buildings: Higher Peak Pressures Compared to Wind Tunnels

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27, Issue 2

Abstract

Recent aerodynamics studies suggest that previous wind tunnel testing may have underestimated peak wind loads on low-rise buildings. Also, climate change is demanding resilient constructions that can survive windstorms. The main objective of this study was to understand the reason for wind-induced damage to the cladding of high-rise buildings. We hypothesized that wall-bounded wind tunnels underestimate the peak loads that cause failure. We executed a unique large-scale (150) experiment in an open-jet facility to test the hypothesis. The advantages of this kind of wind testing include reduced blockage effects and the capability to produce complete velocity spectral content at high Reynolds numbers. We emphasized the influence of aspect ratio and scale effects on the magnitudes and distribution of pressures. We compared results from this study with those from a small-scale wall-bounded wind tunnel to reveal the importance of testing at high Reynolds numbers. The findings suggested that while mean wind pressures on cladding and components are comparable to wall-bounded wind tunnel results, the peak pressures are different. The open jet produced higher peak pressures, revealing that our initial hypothesis was correct. The higher peak pressures toward the upper part of the building agreed with real-world observations of wind damage to cladding. In addition, the results showed that aspect ratio influences the mean and peak pressure distribution on the sidewalls.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the funding support for this research by the Louisiana Board of Regents (BoR). Additional funds were received from the Louisiana State University’s Office of Research and Economic Development (EDA Award) and the LSU NSF Innovation & Technology Commercialization Program (I-Corps). The findings are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the sponsors.

References

Aboulnaga, M. M. 2017. “High-rise buildings in context of sustainability; Urban metaphors of greater Cairo, Egypt: A case study on sustainability and strategic environmental assessment.” In Sustainable high rise buildings in urban zones, edited by A. Sayigh, 163–217. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Aly, A. M., F. Khaled, and H. Gol-Zaroudi. 2020. “Aerodynamics of low-rise buildings: Challenges and recent advances in experimental and computational methods.” Aerodynamics 18 (Jun): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92794.
Aly, A. M., and N. Yousef. 2021. “High Reynolds number aerodynamic testing of a roof with parapet.” Eng. Struct. 234 (May): 112006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112006.
Bashor, R., and A. Kareem. 2006. “Performance of glass/cladding of high-rise buildings in Hurricane Katrina.” In The wind engineer: Newsletter of American association for wind engineering. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame.
Bezabeh, M. A., G. T. Bitsuamlak, M. Popovski, and S. Tesfamariam. 2018. “Probabilistic serviceability-performance assessment of tall mass-timber buildings subjected to stochastic wind loads: Part I—Structural design and wind tunnel testing.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 181 (Oct): 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.012.
Broach, D. 2021. “These are the 10 most expensive hurricanes in US history; See video, storm tracks.” Accessed July 7, 2021. https://www.nola.com/news/hurricane/article_cff6f988-9499-11eb-9f35-9387b108dc7f.html.
Cheng, X., G. Huang, Q. Yang, and X. Zhou. 2021. “Influence of architectural facades on wind pressures and aerodynamic forces of tall buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (1): 04020303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002867.
Discher, E. 2020. “Hurricane Laura blows windows out of 22-story tower in Lake Charles.” Accessed August 27, 2020. https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/weather_traffic/article_e70053b8-e85f-11ea-bbd8-9b5bdabf8207.html.
Elshaer, A., H. Aboshosha, G. Bitsuamlak, A. El Damatty, and A. Dagnew. 2016. “LES evaluation of wind-induced responses for an isolated and a surrounded tall building.” Eng. Struct. 115 (May): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.026.
Feng, S., Y. Wang, and Z. Xie. 2020. “Estimating extreme wind pressure for long-span roofs: Sample independence considerations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 205 (Oct): 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104341.
Fritz, W. P., B. Bienkiewicz, B. Cui, O. Flamand, T. C. E. Ho, H. Kikitsu, C. W. Letchford, and E. Simiu. 2008. “International comparison of wind tunnel estimates of wind effects on low-rise buildings: Test-related uncertainties.” J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE 134 (12): 1887–1890. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:12(1887).
Gol Zaroudi, H., and A. M. Aly. 2017. “Open-jet boundary-layer processes for aerodynamic testing of low-rise buildings.” Wind Struct. 25 (3): 233–259. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.25.3.233.
Hoxey, R. P., A. M. Reynolds, G. M. Richardson, A. P. Robertson, and J. L. Short. 1998. “Observations of Reynolds number sensitivity in the separated flow region on a bluff body.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 73 (3): 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00287-0.
Hoxey, R. P., A. P. Robertson, G. M. Richardson, and J. L. Short. 1997. “Correction of wind-tunnel pressure coefficients for Reynolds number effect.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 69–71 (Jul): 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00185-2.
Huang, M. F., W. Lou, C. M. Chan, N. Lin, and X. Pan. 2013. “Peak distributions and peak factors of wind-induced pressure processes on tall buildings.” J. Eng. Mech. 139 (12): 1744–1756. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000616.
Huang, P., X. Wang, and M. Gu. 2012. “Field experiments for wind loads on a low-rise building with adjustable pitch.” Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 8 (9): 451879. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/451879.
Hui, Y., K. Yuan, Z. Chen, and Q. Yang. 2019. “Characteristics of aerodynamic forces on high-rise buildings with various façade appurtenances.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 191 (May): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.002.
Irwin, P. A. 2008. “Bluff body aerodynamics in wind engineering.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (6–7): 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.008.
Kareem, A. 1986. “Performance of cladding in Hurricane Alicia.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (12): 2679–2693. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:12(2679).
Lakshmanan, N., S. Selvi Rajan, S. Arunachalam, and G. Ramesh Babu. 2009. “Wind tunnel studies on force coefficients for grouped low-rise buildings with parapet.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 14 (3): 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2009)14:3(135).
Lim, Y.-K., S. D. Schubert, R. Kovach, A. M. Molod, and S. Pawson. 2018. “The roles of climate change and climate variability in the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season.” Sci. Rep. 8 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34343-5.
Lou, J.-J., and J. A. Peterka. 1981. “Extreme value analysis of peak wind pressures on buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
Magnus, J. R., B. Melenberg, and C. Muris. 2011. “Global warming and local dimming: The statistical evidence.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106 (494): 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09508.
Meehl, G. A., F. Zwiers, J. Evans, T. Knutson, L. Mearns, and P. Whetton. 2000. “Trends in extreme weather and climate events: Issues related to modeling extremes in projections of future climate change.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81 (3): 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081%3C0427:TIEWAC%3E2.3.CO;2.
Mejorin, A., D. Trabucco, and I. Stelzer. 2019. Cyclone-resistant Façades. Chicago: Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.
Mendis, P., T. Ngo, N. Haritos, A. Hira, B. Samali, and J. Cheung. 2007. “Wind loading on tall buildings.” Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 3 (1): 41–54.
Mou, B., B. J. He, D. X. Zhao, and K. W. Chau. 2017. “Numerical simulation of the effects of building dimensional variation on wind pressure distribution.” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 11 (1): 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2017.1281845.
National Hurricane Center. 2018. Costliest US tropical cyclones tables updated. Miami, FL: National Hurricane Center.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2019. “Climate change impacts.” Accessed July 7, 2021. https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/climate/climate-change-impacts.
National Research Council. 1999. Review of the need for a large-scale test facility for research on the effects of extreme winds on structures. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Neuman, S. 2017. “Hurricane Irma leaves devastation of ‘epic proportions’ in Caribbean.” Accessed July 7, 2021. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/07/549136781/devastation-of-epic-proportions-in-caribbean-wake-of-hurricane-irma.
NOAA Office for Coastal Management. 2021. “Hurricane costs.” Accessed May 11, 2021. https://coast.noaa.gov/states/fast-facts/hurricane-costs.html.
NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information. 2021. Costliest US tropical cyclones. Miami, FL: NOAA.
O’Brien, K., M. Pelling, A. Patwardhan, S. Hallegatte, A. Maskrey, T. Oki, U. Oswald-Spring, T. Wilbanks, and P. Z. Yanda. 2012. “Toward a sustainable and resilient future.” In Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, edited by C. B. Field, et al., 437–486. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Porada, B. 2013. “The timber tower research project: Re-imagining the skyscraper.” Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.archdaily.com/384032/the-timber-tower-research-project-re-imagining-the-skyscraper.
Richards, P. J., and R. P. Hoxey. 2006. “Flow reattachment on the roof of a 6 m cube.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 94 (2): 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.12.002.
Sadek, F., and E. Simiu. 2002. “Peak non-gaussian wind effects for database-assisted low-rise building design.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (5): 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(530).
Samali, B., K. C. S. Kwok, G. S. Wood, and J. N. Yang. 2004. “Wind tunnel tests for wind-excited benchmark building.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (Apr): 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(447).
Samenow, J. 2017. “The forgotten but freakish damage from Hurricane Harvey’s eyewall in Rockport, Tx.” Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2017/09/01/the-forgotten-but-freakish-damage-from-hurricane-harveys-eyewall-in-rockport-tex/.
Stewart, M. G., and X. Deng. 2015. “Climate Impact Risks and Climate Adaptation Engineering for Built Infrastructure.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 1 (1): 4014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000809.
Strauss, B. H., P. M. Orton, K. Bittermann, M. K. Buchanan, D. M. Gilford, R. E. Kopp, S. Kulp, C. Massey, H. de Moel, and S. Vinogradov. 2021. “Economic damages from Hurricane Sandy attributable to sea level rise caused by anthropogenic climate change.” Nat. Commun. 12 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22838-1.
Taha, A. E. 2021. “Vibration control of a tall benchmark building under wind and earthquake excitation.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (2): 4021005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000569.
Tesfamariam, S., M. Bezabeh, K. Skandalos, E. Martinez, S. Dires, G. Bitsuamlak, and K. Goda. 2019. Wind and earthquake design framework for tall wood-concrete hybrid system. Kelowna, BC: Univ. of British Columbia.
Tieleman, H. W. 2003. “Wind tunnel simulation of wind loading on low-rise structures: A review.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (12–15): 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.021.
Yang, Q., and Y. Tian. 2015. “A model of probability density function of non-Gaussian wind pressure with multiple samples.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 140 (May): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.11.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27Issue 2May 2022

History

Received: Jul 28, 2021
Accepted: Dec 21, 2021
Published online: Feb 28, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-139X. Email: [email protected]
Suvash Chapain
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigation of the Pressure Coefficients Correlation Field for Low-Rise Building Roofs, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app122110790, 12, 21, (10790), (2022).
  • Analytical Simulation of 3D Wind-Induced Vibrations of Rectangular Tall Buildings in Time Domain, Shock and Vibration, 10.1155/2022/7283610, 2022, (1-26), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share