Technical Papers
Mar 10, 2022

Mechanical Characteristics of GGBFS/FA-Based Geopolymer Concrete and Its Environmental Impact

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27, Issue 2

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete is considered to be one of the best alternatives to portland cement concrete, partially or totally, not only because it decreases the CO2 emissions released during ordinary portland cement (OPC) production, but also due to its acceptable mechanical and durability properties. This study presents the experimental results of using fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) on fresh and hardened geopolymer concrete properties, considering the effects of several parameters such as binder type and content, alkaline binder ratio, molarity, Si/OH ratio, cement ratio in the binder, water addition, and curing temperature. These parameters were studied over a wider range than in previous research using local by-product waste to determine the validity of the additives for massive production of geopolymer concrete. The studied properties were the slump, 7- and 28-day cube compressive strength, tensile strength, and modulus of elasticity. For all studied mixes, the increase of the binder content, sodium hydroxide concentration, and cement ratio of the binder enhanced the concrete properties, whereas the increase of the alkaline binder ratio, Si/OH ratio in the solution, and additional water decreased the concrete properties. An increase of curing temperature from 30°C to 90°C improved the fly ash–based geopolymer concrete mechanical properties by an average of 35%; in contrast, the same increase in temperature decreased the concrete mechanical properties of GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete by an average of 22%. Equations for tensile strength and modulus of elasticity in terms of compressive strength were proposed and were compared with equations from standards and equations previously proposed in the literature. Finally, the environmental impact in terms of CO2 emissions was found to be on average 90% less than that of conventional concrete of the same grade.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1991. Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete. ACI 211.1-91. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Al-Amoudi, O. S. B., M. Maslehuddin, and M. M. Saadi. 1995. “Effect of magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate on the durability performance of plain and blended cements.” ACI Mater. J. 92 (1): 15–24.
Al-Dulaijan, S. U. 2007. “Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cements exposed to magnesium sulfate solutions.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (8): 1792–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.017.
Aliabdo, A. A., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and M. A. Emam. 2019. “Factors affecting the mechanical properties of alkali activated ground granulated blast furnace slag concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 197 (Feb): 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.086.
Aliabdo, A. A., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and A. M. Fawzy. 2018. “Experimental investigation on permeability indices and strength of modified pervious concrete with recycled concrete aggregate.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 193 (Dec): 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.182.
Aliabdo, A. A., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and H. A. Salem. 2016a. “Effect of cement addition, solution resting time and curing characteristics on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 123 (Oct): 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.043.
Aliabdo, A. A., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and H. A. Salem. 2016b. “Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 121 (Sep): 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.062.
Antoni Wijaya, S. W., and D. Hardjito. 2016. “Compressive strength of geopolymer based on the fly ash variation.” Mater. Sci. Forum 841 (2): 98–103. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.841.98.
AS (Australian Standard). 2009. Concrete structures. AS 3600-2009. Sydney, NSW, Australia: AS.
ASTM. 1996. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496-96. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2008. Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM C494/C494M-08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012a. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural Pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM C618-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012b. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM C143/C143M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM C469/C469M-14e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bakharev, T. 2006. “Thermal behaviour of geopolymers prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing.” Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (6): 1134–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.022.
Brough, A. R., and A. Atkinson. 2002. “Sodium silicate-based, alkali-activated slag mortars: Part I. Strength, hydration and microstructure.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (6): 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00717-2.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1983. Testing concrete—Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes. BS 1881:1983. New Delhi, India: BSI.
Chi, M., and R. Huang. 2013. “Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 40 (Mar): 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.003.
Chindaprasirt, P., T. Chareerat, and V. Sirivivatnanon. 2007. “Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 29 (3): 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.002.
Chithambaram, S. J., S. Kumar, and M. M. Prasad. 2019. “Thermo-mechanical characteristics of geopolymer mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater. 213 (Jul): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.051.
Davidovits, J. 1988. “Soft mineralogy and geopolymers.” In Proc., Geopolymer 88 Int. Conf. Compiègne, France: Université de Technologie.
Davidovits, J. 1994. “Properties of geopolymer cements.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, 131–149. Ukraine, Europe: Kiev State Technical Univ.
Diaz-Loya, E., E. Allouche, and D. Cahoy. 2011. “Statistical-based approach for predicting the mechanical properties of geopolymer concretes.” In Geopolymer binder systems, 1–25. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
El-Hassan, H., and N. Ismail. 2018. “Effect of process parameters on the performance of fly ash/GGBS blended geopolymer composites.” J. Sustainable Cem. Based Mater. 7 (2): 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2017.1411296.
Elyamany, H. E., A. E. M. Abd Elmoaty, and A. M. Elshaboury. 2018. “Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 187 (Oct): 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.025.
Farhan, N. A., M. N. Sheikh, and M. N. S. Hadi. 2019. “Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 196 (Jan): 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083.
Fernández-Jiménez, A., and A. Palomo. 2005. “Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (10): 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.003.
Gomaa, E., S. Sargon, C. Kashosi, and M. ElGawady. 2017. “Fresh properties and compressive strength of high calcium alkali activated fly ash mortar.” J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 29 (4): 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2017.06.001.
Guerneri, M., and J. G. Sanjayan. 2010. “Behavior of combined fly ash/slag-based geopolymers when exposed to high temperatures.” Fire Mater. 34 (4): 163–175.
Gunasekara, C., O. Nanayakkara, M. Sandanayake, D. W. Law, K. Nguyen, J. Xia, and S. Setunge. 2021. “Alkali activated slag concrete incorporating recycled aggregate concrete: Long term performance and sustainability aspect.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 271 (Feb): 121512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121512.
Huang, L., G. Krigsvoll, F. Johansen, Y. Liu, and X. Zhang. 2018. “Carbon emission of global construction sector.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 81 (Jan): 1906–1916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.001.
Huo, W., Z. Zhu, W. Chen, J. Zhang, Z. Kang, S. Pu, and Y. Wan. 2021. “Effect of synthesis parameters on the development of unconfined compressive strength of recycled waste concrete powder-based geopolymers.” Constr. Build. Mater. 292 (Jul): 123264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123264.
John, S. K., Y. Nadir, and K. Girija. 2021. “Effect of source materials, additives on the mechanical properties and durability of fly ash and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 280 (Apr): 122443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122443.
Khodr, M., D. W. Law, C. Gunasekara, S. Setunge, and R. Brkljaca. 2020. “Compressive strength and microstructure evolution of low calcium brown coal fly ash-based geopolymer.” J. Sustainable Cem. Based Mater. 9 (1): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2019.1666061.
Koushkbaghi, M., P. Alipour, B. Tahmouresi, E. Mohseni, A. Saradar, and P. K. Sarker. 2019. “Influence of different monomer ratios and recycled concrete aggregate on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer concretes.” J. Constr. Build. Mater. 205 (Apr): 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.174.
Kumar, S., R. Kumar, and S. P. Mehrotra. 2010. “Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer.” J. Mater. Sci. 45 (3): 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3934-5.
Li, Z., and S. Liu. 2007. “Influence of slag as additive on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (6): 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(470).
Madandoust, R., and R. Ghavidel. 2013. “Mechanical properties of concrete containing waste glass powder and rice husk ash.” Biosyst. Eng. 116 (2): 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.006.
Madhav, T. V., I. R. Reddy, V. G. Ghorpade, and S. Jyothirmai. 2018. “Compressive strength study of geopolymer mortar using quarry rock dust.” Mater. Lett. 231 (Nov): 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.133.
Malhotra, V. M. 1999. “Role of supplementary cementing materials in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” In Proc., Concrete Technology for a Sustainable Development in the 21st Century, 226–236. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Malkawi, A. B., M. F. Nuruddin, A. Fauzi, H. Almattarneh, and B. S. Mohammed. 2016. “Effects of alkaline solution on properties of the HCFA geopolymer mortars.” Procedia Eng. 148 (Jan): 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.581.
Mehta, P. K. 2007. Sustainability of the concrete industry—Critical issues. Washington, DC: ACI Strategic Development Committee’s “Concrete Summit on Sustainable Development.
Memon, F. A., M. F. Nuruddin, S. Khan, N. Shafiq, and T. Ayub. 2013. “Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on fresh properties and compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete.” J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 8 (1): 44–56.
Mustafa Al Bakri, A. M., H. Kamarudin, M. Bnhussain, A. R. Rafiza, and Y. Zarina. 2012. “Effect of Na2SiO3/NaOH ratios and NaOH molarities on compressive strength of fly-ash-based geopolymer.” ACI Mater. J. 109 (5): 1.
Nath, P., and P. K. Sarker. 2014. “Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability, and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition.” Constr. Build. Mater. 66 (Sep): 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080.
Nematollahi, B., and J. Sanjayan. 2014. “Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer.” Mater. Des. 57 (May): 667–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064.
Nematollahi, B., J. Sanjayan, and F. U. Ahmed Shaikh. 2015. “Tensile strain hardening behavior of PVA fiber-reinforced engineered geopolymer composite.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (10): 04015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001242.
Ng, C., U. J. Alengaram, L. S. Wong, K. H. Mo, M. Z. Jumaat, and S. Ramesh. 2018. “A review on microstructural study and compressive strength of geopolymer mortar, paste and concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 186 (Oct): 550–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.075.
Palomo, A., M. W. Grutzeck, and M. T. Blanco. 1999. “Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future.” Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (8): 1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9.
Pavithra, P., M. Srinivasula Reddy, P. Dinakar, B. Hanumantha Rao, B. K. Satpathy, and A. N. Mohanty. 2016. “Effect of the Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio and NaOH molarity on the synthesis of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar.” In Proc., Geo-Chicago 2016, 336–344. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480151.034.
Provis, J. L., and J. S. Van Deventer. 2013. Alkali activated materials: State-of-the-art report. Berlin: Springer.
Puertas, F., S. Martínez-Ramírez, S. Alonso, and T. Vázquez. 2000. “Alkali-activated fly ash/slag cements: Strength behaviour and hydration products.” Cem. Concr. Res. 30 (10): 1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2.
Saloma, S., H. Hanafiah, A. Saggaff, and A. Mawarni. 2016. “Geopolymer mortar with fly ash.” In Vol. 78 of Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 1–6. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167801026.
Samson, E., J. Marchand, K. A. Snyder, and J. J. Beaudoin. 2005. “Modeling ion and fluid transport in unsaturated cement systems in isothermal conditions.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (1): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.016.
Shi, C., and R. L. Day. 1999. “Early strength development and hydration of alkali-activated blast furnace slag/fly ash blends.” Adv. Cem. Res. 11 (4): 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.1999.11.4.189.
Sofi, M., J. S. J. Van Deventer, P. A. Mendis, and G. C. Lukey. 2007. “Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs).” Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (2): 251–257.
Souto-Martinez, A., J. H. Arehart, and W. V. Srubar III. 2018. “Cradle-to-gate CO2e emissions vs. in situ CO2 sequestration of structural concrete elements.” Energy Build. 167 (May): 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.042.
Statista. 2021. “Cement production in the United States from 2010 to 2020.” Accessed December 3, 2021. www.statista.com/statistics/219343/cement-production-worldwide/.
Sumajouw, D. M., D. Hardjito, S. E. Wallah, and B. V. Rangan. 2005. “Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: An application for structural members.” In Proc., Geopolymer 2005 World Congress: Green Chemistry and Sustainable Development Solutions, 149–152. Quentin, France: Institut Geopolymere.
Swanepoel, J. C., and C. A. Strydom. 2002. “Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material.” Appl. Geochem. 17 (8): 1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00005-7.
van Jaarsveld, J. G. S., J. S. J. van Deventer, and G. C. Lukey. 2003. “The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geopolymers.” Mater. Lett. 57 (7): 1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00971-0.
Wardhono, A. 2018. “The effect of sodium hydroxide molarity on strength development of non-cement class C fly ash geopolymer mortar.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 947 (1): 012001.
Yang, K. H., J. K. Song, K. S. Lee, and A. F. Ashour. 2009. “Flow and compressive strength of alkali-activated mortars”. ACI Mater. J. 106 (1): 50–58.
Yost, J. R., A. Radlińska, S. Ernst, and M. Salera. 2013. “Structural behavior of alkali activated fly ash concrete. Part 1: Mixture design, material properties and sample fabrication.” Mater. Struct. 46 (3): 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9919-x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27Issue 2May 2022

History

Received: Aug 27, 2021
Accepted: Dec 13, 2021
Published online: Mar 10, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction and Building Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria 1029, Egypt. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-1781
Ahmed M. Ragheb
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction and Building Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria 21532, Egypt.
Ali H. Shalan
Lecturer, Dept. of Construction and Building Engineering, Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Alexandria 21625, Egypt.
Master’s Student, Dept. of Construction and Building Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria 21613, Egypt (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-0392. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Mechanical and Microstructural Characteristics of Manufactured Sand-Based High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete and Its Environmental Impact, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1308, 28, 4, (2023).
  • Mechanical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Slag-Based Geopolymer Composite, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1293, 28, 3, (2023).
  • Strength characteristics of recycled asphalt pavement aggregate based geopolymer concrete, Materials Today: Proceedings, 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.129, (2023).
  • Factors affecting production and properties of self-compacting geopolymer concrete – A review, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128174, 344, (128174), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share