Abstract
Seismic analysis provisions in ASCE/SEI 7-16 (ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.) use an approximate fundamental period as a proxy for, or to limit, the fundamental period of a building for design. This design period does not vary as a function of the risk category assigned to a building. Fifty-four steel buildings (4-, 8-, and 16-story) with three different seismic force-resisting systems (moment frame, concentrically and eccentrically braced frame) are designed for a region of high seismicity for Risk Category II, III, and IV. The results indicate that the analytical fundamental period is affected when an importance factor greater than 1.0 is used for design, as is required for assigned higher risk categories. Moreover, the database of measured vibration data taken from steel buildings used to establish the empirical formula adopted by ASCE/SEI 7-16 to compute the approximate fundamental period did not include buildings designed with an importance factor. Consequently, if the performance objective is to achieve uniform risk within a category, then the design period should vary as a function of the risk category. In the absence of a lower-bound empirical formulation for the approximate period using a database of vibration data from buildings categorized by risk category, a straightforward modification to the current formulation is proposed that incorporates the change in system strength.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AISC. 2010a. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2010b. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2010c. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2011. Steel construction manual. 14th ed. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341. Chicago: AISC.
Anderson, A. W., J. A. Blume, H. J. Degenkolb, H. B. Hammill, E. M. Knapik, H. L. Marchand, H. C. Powers, J. E. Rinne, G. A. Sedgwick, and H. O. Sjoberg. 1952. “Lateral forces of earthquake and wind.” In Vol. 117 of Proc., Transactions, 716. New York: ASCE.
ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 1972. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ANSI A58.1. New York: ANSI.
ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 1982. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ANSI A58.1. New York: ANSI.
ASCE. 1988. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 1993. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 1995. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 1998. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2002. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2005. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2013. Standard specification for cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in rounds and shapes. ASTM A500/A500M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015a. Standard specification for high-strength low-alloy columbium-vanadium structural steel. ASTM A572/A572M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015b. Standard specification for structural steel shapes. ASTM A992/A992M-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1978. Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. ATC 3-06. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
BOCA (Building Officials and Code Administrators International). 1994. Basic building code (BBC). Country Club Hills, IL: BOCA.
BOCA (Building Officials and Code Administrators International). 1999. Basic building code (BBC). Country Club Hills, IL: BOCA.
Charney, F. A. 2014. Seismic loads: Guide to the seismic load provisions of ASCE 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
FEMA. 1985. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 95. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 1991. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 222. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 1997. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 302. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 368. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2003. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 450. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2005. Blast-resistance benefits of seismic design. FEMA P-439A. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009a. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA P-750. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009b. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P-695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gates, W. E., and U. A. Foth. 1978. Building period correlation. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
Ghosh, S. K., and P. Dasgupta. 2014. Seismic design using structural dynamics based on 2015 IBC/ASCE 7-10/ACI 318. Washington, DC: International Code Council.
Goel, R. K., and A. K. Chopra. 1997. “Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (11): 1454–1461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1454).
Harris, J. L., and M. S. Speicher. 2015a. Assessment of first generation performance-based design methods for new steel buildings, volume 1: Special moment frames. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Harris, J. L., and M. S. Speicher. 2015b. Assessment of first generation performance-based design methods for new steel buildings, volume 2: Special concentrically braced frame. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Harris, J. L., and M. S. Speicher. 2015c. Assessment of first generation performance-based design methods for new steel buildings, volume 3: Eccentrically braced frames. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Hayes, J. R., S. C. Woodson, R. G. Pekelnicky, C. D. Poland, W. G. Corley, and M. Sozen. 2005. “Can strengthening for earthquake improve blast and progressive collapse resistance?” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (8): 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1157).
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1949. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1961. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1973. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1976. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1988. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1991. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1994. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICBO (International Council of Building Officials). 1997. Uniform building code (UBC). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
ICC (International Code Council). 2003. International building code (IBC). Washington, DC: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2012. International building code (IBC). Washington, DC: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2018a. International building code (IBC). Washington, DC: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2018b. International existing building code (IEBC). Washington, DC: ICC.
Mulhern, M. R., and R. P. Maley. 1973. Building period measurements before, during and after the San Fernando earthquake, in San Fernando, California Earthquake of Feb. 9, 1971. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Dept. of Commerce.
Priestley, M. J. N. 2003. Myths and Fallacies in earthquake engineering, revisited: The 9th Mallet Milne lecture, 121. Pavia, IT: IUSS Press.
Richards, P. W. 2010. “Estimating the stiffness of eccentrically braced frames.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 15 (1): 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000027.
SBCCI (Southern Building Code Congress International). 1994. Standard building code (SBC). Birmingham, AL: SBCCI.
SBCCI (Southern Building Code Congress International). 1999. Standard building code (SBC). Birmingham, AL: SBCCI.
SEAOC (Structural Engineering Association of California). 1974. Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. San Francisco: SEAOC.
SEAOC (Structural Engineering Association of California). 1988. Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. San Francisco: SEAOC.
SEAONC (Structural Engineering Association of Northern California). 2001. Recommended provisions for buckling-restrained braced frames. San Francisco: SEAONC.
Speicher, M. S., and J. L. Harris. 2018. “Collapse prevention seismic performance assessment of new buckling-restrained braced frames using ASCE 41.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.067.
Young, K., and H. Adeli. 2014. “Fundamental period of irregular moment-resisting steel frame structure.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 23 (15): 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1112.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 31, 2018
Accepted: Apr 5, 2019
Published online: Jul 15, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.