Technical Papers
Apr 15, 2021

Performance-Based Budget Allocation Model for Water Networks

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 3

Abstract

Budget distribution over water network segments is one of the challenges that face municipalities worldwide. Most water distribution networks (WDNs) are deteriorating, and thus they require urgent rehabilitation, which costs billions of dollars. Therefore, there is a need to develop a prioritization tool for allocating the budget to the inspected components and selecting the most suitable rehabilitation actions. The present research aims to develop a water network performance–based budget allocation (WNPBA) model to allocate budgets based on the performance assessment optimally. The WNPBA model utilizes Weibull distribution to predict the performance for the components, as well as both genetic algorithm (GA) and greedy heuristics (GH) to allocate the available funds optimally. The data required for this research were collected from experts in Montreal’s water services because the developed model was applied to a subnetwork from Montreal. The model’s recommended actions matched the city water services’ actions, utilizing the AQUAMODEX tool by almost 94%. The developed WNPBA has proven to be a promising tool in allocating budget to water networks. Data from a water subnetwork in Montreal were used to demonstrate the proposed model. Therefore, the model is useful for the decision-making process through any water municipality to facilitate the budget allocation process.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available at https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/981481/1/Ismaeel_MASc_F2016.pdf following funder data retention policies. Data that are not covered in the mentioned document are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their thanks and appreciation to Montreal Water Services, Department of Strategic Management for the valuable data they provided for experimenting with this model and for their feedback and comments.

References

Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Alegre, H., and S. T. Coelho. 2012. “Infrastructure asset management of urban water systems.” In Water supply system analysis-selected topics, 49–74. London: InTech.
ASCE. 2017. “Drinking water.” Accessed March 9, 2017. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/drinking-water/.
Burkhalter, M., C. Martani, and B. T. Adey. 2018. “Determination of risk-reducing intervention programs for railway lines and the significance of simplifications.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (1): 04017038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000401.
BluePlan Engineering. 2019. “Canadian infrastructure report card 2019.” Accessed October 9, 2019. http://canadianinfrastructure.ca/downloads/canadian-infrastructure-report-card-2019.pdf.
Dandy, G. C., and M. O. Engelhardt. 2006. “Multi-objective trade-offs between cost and reliability in the replacement of water mains.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (2): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:2(79).
Elhakeem, A. 2005. “An asset management framework for educational buildings with life-cycle cost analysis.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Waterloo Univ.
El-Masoudi, I. 2016. “Condition assessment and optimal repair strategies of water networks using genetic algorithms.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Mansoura Univ.
Giustolisi, O., and L. Berardi. 2009. “Prioritizing pipe replacement: From multiobjective genetic algorithms to operational decision support.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 135 (6): 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(484).
Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ismaeel, M. 2016. “Performance based budget allocation model for water networks.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ.
Ismaeel, M., and T. Zayed. 2018. “Integrated performance assessment model for water networks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (2): 04018005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000419.
Jardine, A. K., and A. H. Tsang. 2013. Maintenance, replacement, and reliability: Theory and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kerwin, S., and B. T. Adey. 2020. “Optimal intervention planning: A bottom-up approach to renewing aging water infrastructure.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (7): 04020044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001217.
Kielhauser, C., and B. T. Adey. 2019. “A demonstration of the use of a unified service model for urban infrastructure networks.” Infrastruct. Asset Manage. 7 (4): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.18.00040.
Kielhauser, C., B. T. Adey, and N. Lethanh. 2017. “Investigation of a static and a dynamic neighbourhood methodology to develop work programs for multiple close municipal infrastructure networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (3): 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1162818.
Le Gauffre, P., C. Joannis, E. Vasconcelos, D. Breysse, C. Gibello, and J.-J. Desmulliez. 2007. “Performance indicators and multicriteria decision support for sewer asset management.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (2): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:2(105).
Lethanh, N., B. T. Adey, and M. Burkhalter. 2018. “Determining an optimal set of work zones on large infrastructure networks in a GIS framework.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (1): 04017048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000410.
Nafi, A., and Y. Kleiner. 2010. “Scheduling renewal of water pipes while considering adjacency of infrastructure works and economies of scale.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 136 (5): 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000062.
Nafi, A., C. Werey, and P. Llerena. 2006. “Scheduling water networks renewal using hybrid optimization model.” In Proc., Joint Int. Conf. on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering. Catonsville, MD: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences.
Saad, D. A., H. Mansour, and H. Osman. 2018. “Concurrent bilevel multi-objective optimisation of renewal funding decisions for large-scale infrastructure networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (5): 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1378238.
Saegrov, S. 2005. CARE-W. London: IWA Publishing.
Salehi, S., M. Jalili Ghazizadeh, and M. Tabesh. 2018. “A comprehensive criteria-based multi-attribute decision-making model for rehabilitation of water distribution systems.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (6): 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1359633.
Shahata, K., T. Zayed, and S. Al-Jibouri. 2006. “Rehabilitation scenarios for sustainable water mains.” In Proc., Pipelines 2006: Service to the Owner, 1–8. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40854(211)63.
Tantawy, M. 2012. “Framework for infrastructure asset management.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Mansoura Univ.
Tscheikner-Gratl, F., R. Sitzenfrei, W. Rauch, and M. Kleidorfer. 2016. “Integrated rehabilitation planning of urban infrastructure systems using a street section priority model.” Urban Water J. 13 (1): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1057174.
USEPA. 2018. Drinking water infrastructure needs survey and assessment: Sixth report to Congress. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Wang, Y., T. Zayed, and O. Moselhi. 2009. “Prediction models for annual break rates of water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 23 (1): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2009)23:1(47).
WEF (World Economic Forum). 2009. “Global competitiveness report 2009-2010.” Accessed November 18, 2010. https://www.weforum.org/reports/world-economic-forum-usa-annual-report-2009-2010.
Wu, Y. C. 2020. “Canadian municipality water main condition assessment and pipe renewal methods.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta.
Xu, Q., Q. Chen, J. Ma, and K. Blanckaert. 2013. “Optimal pipe replacement strategy based on break rate prediction through genetic programming for water distribution network.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 7 (2): 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2013.03.003.
Zangenehmadar, Z., O. Moselhi, and S. Golnaraghi. 2020. “Optimized planning of repair works for pipelines in water distribution networks using genetic algorithm.” Eng. Reports 2 (6): e12179. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12179.
Zayed, T., and E. Mohamed. 2013. “Budget allocation and rehabilitation plans for water systems using simulation approach.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 36 (Jun): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.02.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 3August 2021

History

Received: May 4, 2020
Accepted: Dec 14, 2020
Published online: Apr 15, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 15, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia Univ., Montreal, Canada H3G1M8 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-8506. Email: [email protected]
T. Zayed, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Faculty of Construction and Environment, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share