Technical Papers
Apr 15, 2021

Performance Assessment of Polymeric Composite Wrap to Repair Damaged Pipelines Exposed under Accelerated Environment Conditions

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 3

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced polymer composites are used as emerging materials to repair oil and gas transmission pipelines without stopping the flow of fluids inside. These pipelines are subjected to harsh environment conditions such as being buried under soil and being exposed to high humidity, high temperatures, and different chemicals. It is important to predict the useful life of composite repairs in these harsh conditions in order to design better and to have robust repair solutions. This study evaluates mechanical properties, namely tensile strength tensile modulus, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and lap shear strength, of composite laminates when exposed to harsh environmental conditions such as hot-wet [70°C/85% relative humidity (RH)] for 0, 2, 4, and 6  weeks, steam autoclave [121°C and 1,05,000 Pa (1.05 bar)] for 0, 6, and 12  h, and ultraviolet (UV) ray exposure of type UVA-340 at 50°C for 0 and 2  weeks. The glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite laminates are prepared by hand layup process and are cut using a water-jet cutting process to avoid machining defects and to keep a good surface finish. The specimens are exposed to these corresponding environmental conditions for different periods of time, and the changes in their mechanical properties are studied. The tensile strength, flexural modulus, and lap shear strength values are compared with unexposed specimens. Decreases in strength and modulus values are observed for exposed specimens. A simple empirical expression is developed to predict the usable lifetime of a composite repair system exposed to such different harsh environmental conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The entire research work, including sample preparation, conducting relevant tests, and providing the intellectual support, was done at M/S Vasitars Pvt. Ltd. (www.vasitars.com), a pioneer Indian company offering a nanofiller reinforced–polymer composite repair system for damaged pipelines.

References

Adumitroaie, A., and E. J. Barbero. 2015. “Intralaminar damage model for laminates subjected to membrane and flexural deformations.” Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 22 (9): 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2013.796541.
ASME. 2018. Repair of pressure equipment and piping. PCC-2. New York: ASME.
ASTM. 1999. Standard practice for fluorescent UV exposure of plastics. ASTM D4329-99. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for strength properties of adhesives in shear by tension loading of single-lap-joint laminated assemblies. ASTM D3165-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Barbero, E. J., and D. V. Liliana. 2001. “A constitutive model for elastic damage in fiber-reinforced PMC Laminae.” Int. J. Damage Mech. 10 (1): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1106/6PQ6-31JW-F69K-74LU.
Bazli, M., H. Ashrafi, and A. V. Oskouei. 2016. “Effect of harsh environments on mechanical properties of GFRP pultruded profiles.” Composites, Part B 99 (Aug): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.019.
Budhe, S., M. D. Banea, and S. de Barros. 2019. “Composite repair system for corroded metallic pipelines: An overview of recent developments and modeling.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2019 (Dec): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-019-00696-3.
Budhe, S., M. D. Banea, N. R. F. Rohem, E. M. Sampaio, and S. de Barros. 2017. “Failure pressure analysis of composite repair system for wall loss defect of metallic pipelines.” Compos. Struct. 176 (Sep): 1013–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.044.
Chandra Khan, V. G. Balaganesan, A. Kumar Pradhan, and M. S. Sivakumar. 2017. “Nano fillers reinforced polymer composites wrap to repair corroded steel pipe lines.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 139 (4): 041411. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036534.
Da Costa Mattos, H. S., J. M. L. Reis, L. M. Paim, M. L. da Silva, F. C. Amorim, and V. A. Perrut. 2014. “Analysis of a glass fiber reinforced polyurethane composite repair system for corroded pipelines at elevated temperatures.” Compos. Struct. 114 (18): 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.04.015.
D’Antino, T., M. A. Pisani, and C. Poggi. 2017. “Effect of the environment on the performance of GFRP reinforcing bars.” Compossites, Part B 141 (May): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.037.
De Barros, S., B. M. Fadhil, and F. Alila. 2019. “Using blister test to predict the failure pressure in bonded composite repaired pipes.” Compos. Struct. 211 (Mar):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.030.
Djukic, L. P., A. Y. Leong, P. J. Falzon, and K. H. Leong. 2013. “Qualification of a composite system for pipeline repairs under dry, wet, and water-submerged conditions.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 33 (6): 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684413505009.
Duell, J. M., J. M. Wilson, and M. R. Kessler. 2008. “Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 85 (11): 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001.
Frankel, G. S. 1998. “Pitting corrosion of metals a review of the critical factors.” J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (6): 2186–2198. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838615.
Hammami, A., and N. Al-Ghuilani. 2004. “Durability and environmental degradation of glass-vinylester composites.” J. Polym. Compos. 25 (6): 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20055.
Hawkins, A., R. Walker, T. Grabow, and M. Keller. 2012. Composite repair of pipelines with axial flaws. Houston: NACE International.
ISO. 2011. Fibre-reinforced plastic composites—Determination of flexural properties. ISO 14125:1998/AMD 1:2011. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2017. Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries—Composite repairs pipework—Qualification and design, installation, testing and inspection. London: ISO.
Jun, W., R. Hota Ganga, L. Ruifeng, and L. Weiqing. 2015. “Durability and prediction models of fiber-reinforced polymer composites under various environmental conditions: A critical review.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 35 (3): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684415610920.
Karbhari, V. M. 2015. Handbook rehabilitation of pipelines using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. New York: Elsevier.
Kumar, P. N., V. C. Khan, G. Balaganesan, A. K. Pradhan, and M. S. Sivakumar. 2018. “Repair of through thickness corrosion/leaking defects in corroded pipelines using Fiber Reinforced Polymer overwrap.” Mater. Sci. Eng. 346 (1): 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/346/1/012016.
Li, S., S. R. Reid, and P. D. Soden. 1998. “A continuum damage model for transverse matrix cracking in laminated fibre-reinforced composite.” Philos. Trans.: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 356 (1746): 2379–2412. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1998.0278.
Liu, G., L. Zhang, L. Guo, F. Liao, T. Zheng, and S. Zhong. 2019. “Multi-scale progressive failure simulation of 3D woven composites under uniaxial tension.” J. Compos. Struct. 208 (Jan): 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.081.
Mazurkiewicz, L., M. Tomaszewski, and J. Malachowski. 2016. “Experimental and numerical study of steel pipe with part-wall defect reinforced with fiber glass sleeve.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 149 (Jan): 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.12.008.
NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) International. 2002. Pipeline external corrosion direct assessment methodology. Houston: NACE International.
Nkurunziza, G., A. Debaiky, P. Cousin, and B. Benmokrane. 2005. “Durability of GFRP bars: A Critical review of the literature.” Program Struct. Eng. Mater. 7 (4): 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.205.
Pfennig, A., and A. Kranzmann. 2009. “Effects of saline aquifer water on the corrosion behavior of injection pipe steels 1.4034 and 1.7225 during exposure to CO2 environment.” Energy Proc. 1 (1): 3023–3029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.080.
Pfennig, A., B. Linke, and A. Kranzmann. 2011. “Corrosion behavior of pipe steels exposed for 2 years to CO2-saturated saline aquifer environment similar to the CCS site Ketzin, Germany.” Energy Proc. 4 (Jan): 5122–5129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.488.
PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2015. Annual report mileage for gas distribution systems. Washington, DC: PHMSA.
Shamsuddoha, M., M. Mainul Islam, T. Aravinthan, A. Manalo, and K. T. Lau. 2013. “Effectiveness of using fiber-reinforced polymer composites for underwater steel pipeline repairs.” Compos. Struct. 100 (Jun): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.019.
Thomas, B., N. Farzin, and V. S. Chandra. 2019. “Development and implementation of a multi-scale model for matrix micro cracking prediction in composite structures subjected to low velocity impact.” Compossites, Part B 168 (Jul): 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.033.
Wang, Y., J. Meng, Q. Zhao, and S. Qi. 2010. “Accelerated ageing tests for evaluations of a durability performance of glass-fiber reinforcement polyester composites.” J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 26 (6): 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60087-4.
Xu, J., S. Jie, Q. Xu Hong, H. Kolstein, and F. Bijlaard. 2016. “Moisture absorption/desorption effects on flexural property of glass-fiber-reinforced polyester laminates: Three-point bending test and coupled hygro-mechanical finite element analysis.” J. Polymers 8 (8): 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8080290.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 3August 2021

History

Received: May 1, 2020
Accepted: Dec 4, 2020
Published online: Apr 15, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 15, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Subbalakshmi Yeleswarapu [email protected]
Research Scientist, Research and Development Centre, Vasitars Pvt. Ltd., House No - 7/50, Rohini, Delhi 110085, India. Email: [email protected]
Vishwas Chandra Khan [email protected]
Research Student, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul, Khordha 752050, Odisha, India. Email: [email protected]
Nitheesh Kumar P. [email protected]
Research Student, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul, Khordha 752050, Odisha, India. Email: [email protected]
Balaganesan Gurusamy [email protected]
Senior Technical Officer, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, IIT P.O., Chennai 600036, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mihir Kumar Pandit [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Argul, Khordha 752050, Odisha, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share