Technical Papers
Mar 9, 2021

Risk Assessment Method of Drainage Network Operation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Combined with Analytic Network Process

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 2

Abstract

Drainage networks are generally repaired after a failure occurs, and there is a lack of risk prevention and evaluation. To provide an effective evaluation method for the safe operation of drainage pipe networks, particularly in terms of pipeline failure and the severity of issues, this study classifies the adverse factors of safe operation and establishes an index evaluation system to determine the probability of pipeline failure. The system considers human, management, pipeline attribute, and environmental factors and is suitable for buried drainage pipelines. According to the index evaluation system, the analytic network process (ANP) method is used to consider the coupling relationship between various factors and obtain the weight of each factor. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is performed to obtain the final evaluation results. Finally, the established method is implemented on the drainage network of Suzhou Industrial Park, China. The results show that the evaluation results of this method are consistent with the daily cognition and field detection results. In addition, the index system established in this study can provide a reference for the establishment of accident databases and management of drainage networks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All pipeline data used during the study were provided by Suzhou Industrial Park Qingyuan Huayan Water Co. LTD. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider, as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0802400).

References

Anbari, M. J., M. Tabesh, and A. Roozbahani. 2017. “Risk assessment model to prioritize sewer pipes inspection in wastewater collection networks.” J. Environ. Manage. 190 (Apr): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.052.
Andrew, R. B., R. Nachtmann, T. L. Saaty, and R. Whitaker. 2020. “Forecasting the resurgence of the US economy in 2001: An expert judgment approach.” Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 36 (2): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00025-8.
Blair, A. R., R. Nachtmann, T. L. Saaty, and R. Whitaker. 2020. “Forecasting the resurgence of the US economy in 2001: An expert judgment approach.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 36 (2): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00025-8.
Cardoso, M. A., S. T. Coelho, P. Praça, R. S. Brito, and J. Matos. 2005. “Technical performance assessment of urban sewer systems.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 19 (4): 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(339).
Cole, I. S., and D. Marney. 2012. “The science of pipe corrosion: A review of the literature on the corrosion of ferrous metals in soils.” Corros. Sci. 56 (Mar): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.001.
De Risi, R., F. De Luca, O. S. Kwon, and A. Sextos. 2018. “Scenario-based seismic risk assessment for buried transmission gas pipelines at regional scale.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 9 (4): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000330.
Ebenuwa, A. U., and K. F. Tee. 2020. “Fuzzy reliability and risk-based maintenance of buried pipelines using multiobjective optimization.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (2): 04020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000537.
Erdogmus, S., H. Aras, and E. Koc. 2006. “Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 10 (3): 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.003.
Fares, H., and T. Zayed. 2010. “Hierarchical fuzzy expert system for risk of failure of water mains.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 1 (1): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000037.
Fenner, R. A., and L. Sweeting. 1999. “A decision support model for the rehablitation of ‘non-critical’ sewers.” Water Sci. Technol. 39 (9): 193–200. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0475.
Hu, Y. Y., D. D. Liu, and X. Y. Zhang. 2009. “Application of improved AHP in subway fire risk assessment.” [In Chinese.] J. Beijing Univ. Civ. Eng. Arch. 25 (03): 38–41+59. https:// doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6011.2009.03.009.
Jamshidi, A., A. Yazdani-Chamzini, S. H. Yakhchali, and S. Khaleghi. 2013. “Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 (1): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.10.010.
Jun, H. J., J. K. Park, and C. H. Bae. 2020. “Factors affecting steel water-transmission pipe failure and pipe-failure mechanisms.” Environ. Eng. 146 (6): 04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001692.
Karsak, E., S. Sozer, and S. E. Alptekin. 2003. “Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 44 (1): 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00191-2.
Kleiner, Y., B. Rajani, and R. Sadiq. 2006. “Failure risk management of buried infrastructure using fuzzy-based techniques.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 55 (2): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.075.
Kong, Y., Q. H. Chen, J. Zhang, X. Ren, and L. Ma. 2013. “Application of three scale AHP in nuclear emergency decision making.” [In Chinese.] Math. Pract. Theory 43 (9): 111–116. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:SSJS.0.2013-09-017.
Layth, K., S. Raj, M. Wilfred, and B. Fiona. 2020. “Using stakeholders’ judgement and fuzzy logic theory to analyze the risk influencing factors in oil and gas pipeline projects: Case study in Iraq, Stage II.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 28 (Mar): 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100337.
Lowrance, W. W., and J. Klerer. 1976. “Of acceptable risk: Science and the determination of safety.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 123 (11): 192. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2132690.
Mark, O., C. Wennberg, T. Van Kalken, F. Rabbi, and B. Albinsson. 1998. “Risk analyses for sewer systems based on numerical modelling and GIS.” Saf. Sci. 30 (1): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00036-8.
Meade, L., and J. Sarkis. 1998. “Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 34 (3): 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(98)00012-X.
Partovi, F. Y. 2006. “An analytic model for locating facilities strategically.” Omega 34 (1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.018.
Rogers, P. D., and N. S. Grigg. 2009. “Failure assessment modeling to prioritize water pipe renewal: Two case studies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 15 (3): 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:3(162).
Saaty, T. 1996. “Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process.” International 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Salman, B., and O. Salem. 2012. “Risk assessment of wastewater collection lines using failure models and criticality ratings.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 3 (3): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000100.
Tran, H., S. Molavi, and N. Muttil. 2011. “Assessment framework for the impacts of climate change and urbanization on urban drainage systems.” In Proc., Pipelines 2011, 1403–1412. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41187(420)129.
Ugarelli, R., G. Venkatesh, V. D. Federico, and S. Sægrov. 2010. “Asset management for urban wastewater pipeline networks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (2): 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000011.
Ulutas, B. H. 2005. “Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey.” Energy 30 (7): 1146–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.08.009.
Vladeanu, G. J., and J. C. Matthews. 2019. “Consequence-of-failure model for risk-based asset management of wastewater pipes using AHP.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. 10 (2): 04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000370.
Wang, B., and T. Li. 2007. “Risk analysis of drainage pipelines.” [In Chinese.] Chin. Water Wastewater 23 (10): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4602.2007.10.001.
Wang, L. F. 2001. “The theory and algorithm of analytic network process.” [In Chinese.] Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 21(3):44–50. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2001.03.009.
Webber, S. A., B. Apostolou, and J. M. Hassell. 1997. “The sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentations.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96 (2): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00081-1.
Wolfslehner, B., H. Vacik, and M. J. Lexer. 2005. “Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management.” For. Ecol. Manage. 207 (1–2): 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.025.
Xing, J., H. Meng, and X. Meng. 2020. “An urban pipeline accident model based on system engineering and game theory.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 64 (Mar): 104062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104062.
Xu, D. Q., and Q. Zhang. 2019. “AHP-GRA-based risk assessment of combined sewage pipeline.” [In Chinese.] J. Saf. Environ. 19 (4): 1149–1154. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:AQHJ.0.2019-04-007.
Yan, C., Q. Noor, and V. M. Chad. 2020. “Bayesian network and game theory risk assessment model for third-party damage to oil and gas pipelines.” Process Saf. Environ. 134 (Feb): 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.038.
Yan, W. T., T. R. Long, and Z. H. H. Q. Chen. 2009. “Study on the actual health evaluation model and application of urban sewage pipeline.” [In Chinese.] Chin. Water Wastewater 25 (09): 79–82+86. https://doi.org/JournalArticle/5af3185ac095d718d804f720.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zhang, S., and W. Hau-San. 2010. “ARImp: A generalized adjusted rand index for cluster ensembles.” In Proc., 20th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 778–781. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2011.11.017.
Zhu, W., and W. G. L. K. H. Weng. 2016. Risk assessment of urban underground pipeline operation safety. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Science Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 2May 2021

History

Received: Jun 24, 2020
Accepted: Nov 16, 2020
Published online: Mar 9, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhenning Ba [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, China; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Yaguan Rd. 135, Haihe Education Park, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300354, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Yaguan Rd. 135, Haihe Education Park, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300354, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, China; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Yaguan Rd. 135, Haihe Education Park, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300354, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-0602. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Student, Tianjin International Engineering Institute, Tianjin Univ., Weijin Rd. 92, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China. Email: [email protected]
Mingshuo Wang [email protected]
Master’s Student, School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Univ., Yaguan Rd. 135, Haihe Education Park, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300354, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share