Technical Notes
May 22, 2020

Computational Fluid Dynamics Erosion Investigation Using Single Objective Adjoint Shape Optimization

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11, Issue 3

Abstract

Adjoint methods integrated with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools can be used to tackle geometric optimization in processes and equipment in an industrial environment. This work presents a workflow for geometric optimization on a typical pipe elbow geometry using an adjoint–CFD methodology. It uses the ANSYS Fluent CFD and discrete adjoint solver in a stepwise way to guide shape modification to decrease pipe pressure drop. Finally, it discusses the effect of the optimized shape configuration on the predictions of three well-known erosion models. For the majority of gas velocity conditions investigated, a decrease occurred in the peak values and area spread of the erosion spots for the shape-optimized geometry. For some of the velocity conditions investigated a new erosion spot was predicted for the optimized geometry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Aquaro, D., and E. Fontani. 2001. “Erosion of ductile and brittle materials.” Meccanica 36 (6): 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016396719711.
Cacuci, D. G., R. Fang, M. Ilic, and M. C. Badea. 2016. “A heat conduction and convection analytical benchmark for adjoint solution verification of computational fluid dynamics codes used in reactor design.” Nucl. Sci. Eng. 182 (4): 452–480. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-69.
Chen, X., B. S. McLaury, and S. A. Shirazi. 2004. “Application and experimental validation of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based erosion prediction model in elbows and plugged tees.” Comput. Fluids 33 (10): 1251–1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.02.003.
Chopard, B., and A. Masselot. 1999. “Cellular automata and lattice Boltzmann methods: A new approach to computational fluid dynamics and particle transport.” Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 16 (2–3): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(99)00050-3.
Corral, R., and F. Gisbert. 2008. “Profiled end wall design using an adjoint Navier–Stokes solver.” J. Turbomach. 130 (2): 021011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2751143.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2007. Recommended practice RP O501: Erosive wear in piping systems, revision 4.2. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
Elsayed, K. 2015. “Design of a novel gas cyclone vortex finder using the adjoint method.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 142 (Mar): 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.01.010.
Errico, R. M. 1997. “What is an adjoint model?” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 78 (11): 2577–2591. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078%3C2577:WIAAM%3E2.0.CO;2.
Finnie, I. 1960. “Erosion of surfaces by solid particles.” Wear 3: 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(60)90055-7.
Giannakoglou, K. C., and D. I. Papadimitriou. 2008. “Adjoint methods for shape optimization.” In Optimization and computational fluid dynamics, edited by D. Thévenin and G. Janiga, 79–108. Berlin: Springer.
Giles, M. B., and N. A. Pierce. 2000. “An introduction to the adjoint approach to design.” Flow Turbul. Combust. 65 (3–4): 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011430410075.
Grant, G., and W. Tabakoff. 1975. “Erosion prediction in turbomachinery resulting from environmental solid particles.” J. Aircr. 12 (5): 471–478. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.59826.
Haugen, K., O. Kvernvold, A. Ronold, and R. Sandberg. 1995. “Sand erosion of wear-resistant materials: Erosion in choke valves.” Wear 186–187 (Jul): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)07158-X.
Helgason, H., and S. Krajnovic. 2012. “Aerodynamic shape optimization of a pipe using the adjoint method.” In Proc., ASME 2012 Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Hill, D. C. 1995. “Adjoint systems and their role in the receptivity problem for boundary layers.” J. Fluid Mech. 292: 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112095001480.
Jameson, A. 1988. “Aerodynamic design via control theory.” J. Sci. Comput. 3 (3): 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061285.
Jameson, A. 2003. Aerodynamic shape optimization using the adjoint method. Rhode St Genese, Belgium: Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
Jarny, Y., M. N. Ozisik, and J. P. Bardon. 1991. “A general optimization method using adjoint equation for solving multidimensional inverse heat conduction.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 34 (11): 2911–2919. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(91)90251-9.
Jones, D., J. D. Muller, and F. Christakopoulos. 2011. “Preparation and assembly of discrete adjoint CFD codes.” Comput. Fluids 46 (1): 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.042.
Karimi, S., S. A. Shirazi, and B. S. McLaury. 2017. “Predicting fine particle erosion utilizing computational fluid dynamics.” Wear 376–377 (Apr): 1130–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.022.
Liu, W., R. You, J. Zhang, and Q. Chen. 2017. “Development of a fast fluid dynamics-based adjoint method for the inverse design of indoor environments.” J. Build. Perform. Simul. 10 (3): 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2016.1257654.
Lohner, R., O. Soto, and C. Yang. 2003. “An adjoint-based design methodology for CFD optimization problems.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14 (6): 734–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/09615530410544292.
Lozano, C. 2012. “Discrete surprises in the computation of sensitivities from boundary integrals in the continuous adjoint approach to inviscid aerodynamic shape optimization.” Comput. Fluids 56 (Mar): 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.12.001.
Luchini, P., and A. Bottaro. 2014. “Adjoint equations in stability analysis/an introduction to adjoint problems.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46: 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141253.
Mansouri, A., H. Arabnejad, S. A. Shirazi, and B. S. McLaury. 2015. “A combined CFD/experimental methodology for erosion prediction.” Wear 332–333 (May–Jun): 1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.11.025.
McLaury, B. S., S. A. Shirazi, J. R. Shadley, and E. F. Rybicki. 1996. “Modeling erosion in chokes.” In Vol. 236 of Proc., ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 773–782. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Mohammadi, B., and O. Pironneau. 2001. Applied shape optimization for fluids. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Muller, J. D., and P. Cusdin. 2005. “On the performance of discrete adjoint CFD codes using automatic differentiation.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 47 (8–9): 939–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.885.
Nadarajah, S., and A. Jameson. 2000. “A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization.” In Proc., 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Nøkleberg, L., and T. Søntvedt. 1998. “Erosion of oil&gas industry choke valves using computational fluid dynamics and experiment.” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 19 (6): 636–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(98)10039-5.
Oka, Y. I., K. Okamura, and T. Yoshida. 2005. “Practical estimation of erosion damage caused by solid particle impact. Part 1: Effects of impact parameters on a predictive equation.” Wear 259 (1–6): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.039.
Othmer, C. 2008. “A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 58 (8): 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1770.
Parsi, M., K. Najmi, F. Najafifard, S. Hassani, B. S. McLaury, and S. A. Shirazi. 2014. “A comprehensive review of solid particle erosion modeling for oil and gas wells and pipelines applications.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 21 (Nov): 850–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.10.001.
Peri, S., and B. Rogers. 2007. “Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) erosion study for chokes.” In Proc., Int. Petroleum Technology Conf. Dubai, United Arab Emirates: International Petroleum Technology Conference.
Russel, R., S. A. Shirazi, and J. Macrae. 2004. “A new computational fluid dynamics model to predict flow profiles and erosion rates in downhole completion equipment.” In Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition. Houston, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Salama, M. M. 2000. “An alternative to API 14E erosional velocity limits for sand-laden fluids.” J. Energy Res. Technol. 122 (2): 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.483167.
Sommerfeld, M. 1992. “Modelling of particle-wall collisions in confined gas-particle flows.” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 18 (6): 905–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(92)90067-Q.
Stuck, A., F. F. Camelli, and R. Lohner. 2010. “Adjoint-based design of shock mitigation devices.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 64 (4): 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2164.
Vieira, R. E., A. Mansouri, B. S. McLaury, and S. A. Shirazi. 2016. “Experimental and computational study of erosion in elbows due to sand particles in air flow.” Powder Technol. 288 (Jan): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.028.
Wallace, M. S., W. M. Dempster, T. Scanlon, J. Peters, and S. McCulloch. 2004. “Prediction of impact erosion in valve geometries.” Wear 256 (9–10): 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2003.06.004.
Wang, C. Z., K. R. Nagisetty, F. Montanari, and D. C. Hill. 2015. “Application of adjoint solver to optimization of fin heat exchanger.” In Proc., ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Wang, M. H., C. Huang, K. Nandakumar, P. Minev, J. Luo, and S. Chiovelli. 2014. “Computational fluid dynamics modelling and experimental study of erosion in slurry jet flows.” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 23 (2): 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560902744412.
Xu, S., W. Jahn, and J. D. Muller. 2014. “CAD-based shape optimisation with CFD using a discrete adjoint.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 74 (3): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.3844.
Zhang, Y., E. P. Reuterfors, B. S. McLaury, S. A. Shirazi, and E. F. Rybicki. 2007. “Comparison of computed and measured particle velocities and erosion in water and air flows.” Wear 263 (1–6): 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.048.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: Oct 9, 2019
Accepted: Jan 31, 2020
Published online: May 22, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Maringa State Univ., Av Colombo 5790, Maringa, PR 87023-025, Brazil (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Technical Division Engineer, ANSYS Japan, Nittochi Nishishinjuku Bldg. 18F, 6-10-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share